G x E evaluation for feed barley genotypes evaluated in country by AMMI analysis
Article Main
Abstract
AMMI analysis of feed barley genotypes exhibited highly significant effects of environments, genotypes and interactions for both the years. The major portion of the total variance was described by the environmental effects up to 45.6% and 42.3% in respective years. The genotypes effects contributed marginally as of only 8.6% and 6.9% of total variation. The significant interaction effects were partitioned into IPCA1, IPCA2 , IPCA3 and IPCA4; which explained upto 42.4, 18.3, 9.7 and 8.1% of the first year and 32.2, 20.3, 15.6 and 10.5% for second year. The cumulative effect of first two interaction principal components comes out to 60.7% and 52.3% respectively. Maximum genotype yield during study period varied from 49.8 to 48 whereas the lowest yield ranged from 37 to 36.4 q/ha. AMMI stability index identified genotypes G9(BH 972), G15(JB 274) for former and G23(DWRB 109) & G2(KB 1205) for latter year. AMMI distance marked G15(JB 274) & G7(NDB 1561) for first and genotypes G26(UPB 1034) & G23(DWRB 109) for the second year. Desirable genotypes for selection would be G11(PL 871), G27(PL 872) and G23(DWRB 109), G20(BH 946) for respective years a per the GSI score. Genotypes with IPCA-1 scores close to zero identified G1(PL 751), G9(BH 972) and G27(PL 872 ) for first year and G5(RD 2786), G4(NDB 1554) and G24 (UPB 1036) for second year would have wider adaptation to the tested environments as per AMMI graphical plots.
Article Details
Article Details
ASV, Biplots, D, GSI, GxE interaction, IPCA, MET
Alake, C. O. and Ariyo, O. J. (2012). Comparative Analysis of Genotype x Environment Interaction Techniques in West African Okra (Abelmoschus caillei, A. Chev Stevels). J. Agric. Sci. 4 (4): 135-150.
Bavandpori, F., Ahmadi, J. and Hossaini, S. (2015).Yield Stability Analysis of Bread Wheat Lines using AMMI Model. Agricultural Communications. 3(1): 8-15.
Carbonell, S.A., Filho J.A., Dias L.A., Garcia A.A. and Morais, L.K. 2004. Common bean genotypes and lines interactions with environments. Scientific Agric., 61:169-177.
Dehghani H, Ebadi, A. and Yousefi, A. (2006). Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal 98: 388-393.
Farshadfar, E. (2008). Incorporation of AMMI stability value and grain yield in a single non-parametric index (GSI) in bread wheat. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 11(14): 1791-1796.
Mortazavian, S. M. M., Nikkhah, H. R., Hassani, F. A., Sharif-al-Hosseini, M., Taheri, M., and Mahlooji, M. (2014). GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of yield performance of barley genotypes across different environments in Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 16: 609-622.
Ntawuruhunga, P.H., Rubaihayo, P., Whyte, J.B.A., Dixon, A.G.O. and Osiru, D.S.O. (2001). Additive main effects and multiplication interaction analysis for storage root yield of cassava genotypes evaluated in Uganda. Africa Crop Sciences Journal. 9 (4):591-598.
Purchase, J.L., Hatting, H. and Vandeventer, C.S. (2000). Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 17: 101-107.
Samonte, S.O.P.B., Wilson L.T., Mcclung, A.M. and Medley, J.C.(2005). Targeting cultivar onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Sci. 45: 2414-2424.
VSN International .(2014). GenStat for Windows 17th Edition. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
Yan, W., and Hunt, L.A. (2001). Interpretation of genotype – environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science 41:19-25.
Zang, Z., Lu, C. and Xiang, Z.H. (1998). Analysis of variety stability based on AMMI model. Acta Agron. Sin. 24: 304-309.
Zobel, R.W., Wright, M.J., and Gauch, H.G. Jr. (1988). Statistical analysis of yield trial. Agronomy Journal. 80:388-393.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
