##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

A. K. Panda R. K. Goyal A. K. Godara Vikas Kumar Sharma

Abstract

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) fruits cv. Sweet Charlie were harvested at the 3/4th maturity stage. Freshly harvested fruits were packed in plastic punnets and wrapped with different packaging materials viz., low-density polyethylene (LDPE) 25, 50 and 75 micron, polypropylene (PP) 25 micron, cellophane paper and cling film. Effect of all the packaging materials was studied in ambient storage condition (18-25 ºC and 80-90% RH). The result showed that LDPE 50 micron packaging material proved as the most effective one to control the weight loss (5.49%) and all of the LDPE films along with the PP and cling films appeared best to minimize decay loss. MAP conditions help prevent the decaying of strawberry fruits up to a day. The total soluble solids (6.35% - 5.78%) and titratable acidity (0.91% - 0.70%) were found to be decreased with the prolongation of storage periods, but no significant variation was recorded for different packaging materials. A better level of ascorbic acid in strawberry fruits packed with LDPE 50 (31.56 mg/ 100g) and 75 micron (29.86 mg/ 100g) packaging films was retained. The organoleptic rating of strawberry fruits was found best in fruits packed with LDPE 50 micron (7.90) packaging films. In future, these experimental results may prove very useful for storage of strawberry fruits for a certain period in better quality.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Packaging materials, Quality, Room temperature, Shelf life, Strawberry

References
A.O.A.C. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis 12th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, D.C. USA.
Agrahari, P.R., Thakur, K.S., Sharma, R.M., Tripathi, V.K. and Singh, R.R. (2001). Effects of various packaging treatments and storage atmosphere on storage quality of Chandler strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Scientia Hort., 7: 63-74.
Ben, Y. (1985). Individual seal packaging of fruits and vegetables in plastic films- a new post-harvested technique. Hort Sci., 94: 524-528.
El-Kazzaz, M.K., Sommer, N.F. and Fortlage, R.J. (1983). Effect of different atmospheres on post-harvest decay and quality of fresh strawberries. Phytopathology., 73: 282-285.
Garcia, J.M., Medina, R.J., Olias, J.M. (1998). Quality of strawberries automatically packed in different plastic films. J. Food Sci., 63(6): 1037-41.
Hardenburg, R.E. (1971). Effect of in-package environment on keeping quality of fruits and vegetables. Hort Sci., 6: 178.
Kader, A.A. (1992). Modified atmosphere during transport and storage. In Postharvest Technology and Quality of Strawberries. J. American Soc. Hort. Sci., 114: 629-634.
Kirad, K.S., Barche, S., Dash, A. and Sharma R.K. (2007). Responses of different packaging materials and chemicals on the shelf life of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) and correlation between different traits. Acta Hort., 746: 89-95.
Kumar, R. and Nagpal, R. (1996). Effect of post-harvest treatment on the storage behavior of mango cv. Dusehri. Haryana J. hortic. Sci., 25: 101-108.
Li, C., and Kader, A.A. (1989). Residual effects of controlled atmospheres on postharvest physiology and quality of strawberries.J. American Soc. Hort. Sci., 114: 629-634. Magazine, N., Keserovic, Z., Cabilovski, R., Milic, B., Doric, M. and Manojlovic, M. (2015). Modified atmosphere packaging of full ripe strawberries. Acta Hort., 1071: 241-244.
Mingchi, L. and Kojimo, T. (2005). Study on fruit injury susceptibility of strawberry grown under different soil moisture to storage and transportation. J. Fruit Sci., 22: 238-242.
Nunes, M.C.N, Brecht, J.C., Morais, A.M. and Sargent, S.A. (2006). Physiochemical changes during strawberry development in the field compared with those that occur in harvested fruits during storage. J. Sci. Food and Agric., 1: 180-190.
Ozkaya, O., Dundar, O., Scovazzo, G.C. and Volpe, G. (2009). Evaluation of quality parameters of strawberry fruits in modified atmospheric packaging during storage. African J. Biotech., 8(5):789-793.
Panse, V.G. and Sukatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical methods for Agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 155.
Sheoran, O.P. (2004). Statistical package for Agricultural Research workers, CCS HAU, Hisar.http://hau.ernet.in.
Siddiqui, S. and Gupta, O.P. (1997). Effect of individual fruit wrapping by different materials on the shelf life of Guava cv. Allahabad Safeda.Haryana J. hortic. Sci., 26 (1-2): 101-104.
Sonkar, R.K. and Ladaniya, M.S. (1998). Effect of tray over wrapping by heat shrinkable and stretchable films on Nagpur mandarin fruits. Indian Food Packer, 52(5): 22-26.
Sun, J., Chu, Y.F., Wu, X., and Liu, R.H. (2002). Antioxidant and anti-proliferative activities of common fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: 7449–7454.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Effect of packaging materials on the shelf-life of strawberry cv. Sweet Charlie under room temperature storage. (2016). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(3), 1290-1294. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i3.955