Mungbean yield and nutrient uptake performance in response of NPK and lime levels under acid soil in Vindhyan region, India
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to understanding the management of soil acidity with NPK and lime levels for sustainable mungbean productivity, Crop was sown during kharif season of 2014at Agronomy farm of Rajiv Gandhi South Campus Banaras Hindu University, Barkachha, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh. Results of the study demonstrated that significant improvement in seed (524 kg /ha), straw (1426 kg /ha), biological yield (1949 kg/ha) and total NPK uptake (96.68 kg/ha) were recorded in 100% RDF. Similar results were observed with application of 200 kg lime/ha in mungbean. Interaction effect was also recorded at P=0.05 level of significance between fertility and lime levels on mungbean seed (622 kg/ha) and biological (2145kg/ha) yield with 100 % RDF + 200 kg lime/ha which were observed highest than all other treatments. Moreover, highest B:C ratio was observed with the application of 200 kg lime/ha. The present study revealed that soil acidity problems affecting pulses productivity, can be overcome with applications of 100% RDF and 200 kg lime/ha in Vindhyan region, India.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Acid soil, Fertility Levels, Lime, Mungbean, Yield
Awomi, T.A., Singh,A.K., Kumar, M. and Bordoloi, L.J. (2012). Effect of phosphorus, molybdenum and cobalt nutrition on yield and quality of mungbean (Vigna radi-ate L.) in acidic soil of Northeast India. Indian Journal of HillFarmarming, 25 (2): 22-26.
Bolan N.S., Adriano D.C., Curtin D. (2003).Soil acidifica-tion and liming interactions with nutrient and heavy metal transformation and bioavailability.Advances in Agronomy, 78: 215–272.
Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R .(2002). The nature and proper-ties of soil 13th edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Browne, T.T., Koenig, R.T., Huggins, D.R., Harsh, J.B. and Rossi, R.E. (2008). Lime effects on soil acidity, crop yield, and aluminum chemistry in direct seeded crop-ping systems. Soil Science Society American Journal, 72: 634-640.
Dhakal,Y., Meena, R.S., De, N.Verma, S.K. and Singh, A. (2015). Growth, yield and nutrient content of mungbean (Vignaradiata L.) in response to INM in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Bangladesh journal of Botany, 44 (3): 479-482.
GOI. (2011). Economic Survey of India, Ministry of Finance (Economic Division) GOI, New Delhi. Pp 17-22.
Gomez, K.A and Gomaz, A.A. (1984).Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, Singa-pore.
Gopalan, C., Rama Sastri, B.V. and BAlasubramanian, S.C. (2002).Nutritive Value of Indian Foods, National Insti-tute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India.pp 76-82.
Jackson, M .L. (1973).Soil Chemical Analysis.Prentice Hall of Inc. Engle Chiffs. New Jersey.
Kochian, L.V., Hoekenga, O.A. and Piners, M.A. (2004). How do crop plants tolerate acid soils: Mechanism of aluminum tolerance and phosphorus efficiency. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55: 459-493.
Lambridge, C.J., Godwin, I.D. (2007). Mungbean. In: Kole C, editor. Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants, Volume 3: Pulses, sugar, and tuber crops. Hei-delberg: Springer Verlag. pp. 69-90.
Meena, R.S. (2013). Response to different nutrient Sources on green gram (Vignaradiata L.) Productivity. Indian Journal of Ecology, 40(2): 353-355.
Meena, R. S. and Yadav R. S. (2014).Phenological Perform-ance of Groundnut Varieties under Sowing Environ-ments in Hyper Arid Zone of Rajasthan, India.Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 6 (2): 344-348.
Meena, R. S. and Yadav, R. S. (2015). Yield and Profitabil-ity of Groundnut (ArachishypogaeaL) As Influenced by Sowing Dates and Nutrient Levels With Different Va-rieties. Legume Research, 38 (6): 791-797.
Meena, R.S., Dhakal, Y., Bohra, J.S., Singh., S.P., Singh, M.K. and Sanodiya, P. (2015a). Influence of Bioinor-ganic Combinations on Yield, Quality and Economics of Mung Bean.American Journal of Experimental Agri-culture, 8 (3): 159-166.
Meena, R.S., Yadav, R.S., Meena, H., Kumar, .S, Meena,Y. K. and Singh, A. (2015b). Towards the current need to enhance legume productivity and soil sustainability worldwide: A book review.Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion, 104: 513-515.
Olsen, S..R, Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ. No. 939,Washington.
Sheldrick, W.F., Syers, J.K. and Lingard, J. (2011). A con-ceptual model for conducting nutrient audits at the na-tional, regional and global scales. Nutr. Cycl. Agro-ecosystem, 62: 61-72.
Stanford, S. and English, L. (1949).Use of flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca. Agronomy Journal, 41: 446–7.
Subbiah, B.V. and Asija ,G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr.Scie., 25: 259-260.
Tyler, G., Olsson T. (2001). Concentrations of 60 elements in the soil solution as related to the soil acidity. Europ. J. Soil Scie., 52: 151–165.
Wang, J., Raman, H., Zhang, G., Mendham, N. and Zou, M. (2006). Aluminum tolerance in barely (Horidium vul-garize L.): Physiological mechanisms, genetics and screening methods. Journal of Zhejing University of Sciences, 7: 769-787.
Walkey, A., and Black, I. A. (1947).Rapid titration method for organic carbon of soils. Soil Science, 37:29-32.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
