Tarak Nath Goswami Munna Yadav Anil Anil Shree Niwash Ray


Spiders act as one of the most important defenders in paddy ecosystem and there are several families of those with different habits. The question on the effect of chemical application in comparison to the non chemical option on different spider families in the zone under study was attempted for getting answer. For that purpose, the field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2014 for studying spider abundance in chemical versus non-chemical treatments. Chemical based treatment consisted of the application of Phorate 10G at 10 days after transplanting (DAT), followed by spraying with Imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 45 DAT, and dusting of Methyl Parathion 2D at 80 DAT. Transplanting of rice following skip row technique, sowing of okra, cowpea, sesame & balsam on the surrounding bunds, retention of weeds on the bunds, single inoculative release of Trichogramma chilonis @ 1,00,000 at 35 DAT, and use of pheromone (Scirpophaga incertulus lure)-cum -light trap @ 10 traps ha-1 were integrated together in nonchemical based treatment. The results revealed that the population of wolf spiders and long jawed spiders were statistically higher during all the seven dates of observation in non-chemical based approach. Amongst Araneid spiders, non-chemical based approach recorded significantly higher population at 60, 75 and 90 DAT. On the basis of overall mean, the non-chemical treatment had significantly higher population of spiders belonging to most of the families except Thomisidae. The mean population of spiders across the families varied from 1.06 to 12.0 and 0.54 to 6.66 per double sweep per sub plot in non-chemical based and chemical based treatment, respectively. Thus, the study confirms the safety of the non-chemical based approach in maintaining significantly higher level of spider population.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...




Non-chemical, Pest management, Paddy, Spiders

Directorate of Economics and Statistics. (2015). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2014. Oxford University Press, New Delhi. p 452.
Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 680p.
Gurr, G.M, Wratten, S.D. and Altieri, M.A. (2004). Ecological engineering: advances in habitat manipulation for arthropods. Collingwood (Australia): CSIRO Publishing. 232 p.
Hafeez, A., Khan, R.B., Sharma, D., Jamwal, V.V.S. and Gupta, S. (2010). Seasonal incidence, infestation and trap catches of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) in Rice. Annals of Plant Prot Sci, 18(2): 380-383.
Heong, K.L. (2009). Are planthopper problems caused by a breakdown in ecosystem services? In: Planthoppers: New Threats to the Sustainability of Intensive Rice Production Systems in Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños (Philippines) (ed. K. L. Heong, and B. Hardy), pp. 221-232.
Hui, M.X. and Liu, Y. (2014). The influence of insecticide on the main natural enemies in rice field. Journal of North Rice Office, Liaoning, China, North Rice, 44(2): 32-33.
Kun, M.X., Zhang, Y.X., Guo, B.N., Sun, H.H., Liu, C.J. and Liu, Z.W. (2015). Identification of key amino acid differences contributing to neonicotinoid sensitivity between two nacho ? subunits from Pardosa pseudoannulata. Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd., Shannon, Irish Republic, Neuroscience Letters, 584: 123-128.
Motobayashi, T., Ishijima, C., Takagi, M., Murakami, M., Taguchi, A., Hidaka, K. and Kunimi, Y. (2006). Effects of tillage practices on spider assemblage in rice paddy fields. Appl Ent Zool, 41(2): 371– 381.
Parker, S.P. (1982). Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, vol. 2. McGraw Hill, New York.
Pathak, M., Rizvi, P.Q., Kumar, P.,Garg, D.K. and Singh, N.K. (2011). Natural enemies of rice insect pests in rice-wheat cropping system of northern gangetic plains. Oryza. 48(4):383-386.
Satpathi, C.R. (2004). Predacious spiders of crop pests. Capital publishing company, New Delhi.
Sebastian, P.A., Mathew, M.J., Beevi, P., John Joseph, S. and Biju, C.R. (2005). The spider fauna of the irrigated rice ecosystem, in central Kerala, India. J Arachnol, 33: 247–255.
Sigsgaard, L., Villareal, S., Gapud, V. and Rajotte, E. (1999). Directional movement of predators between the irrigated paddy field and its surroundings. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Biological Control in the Tropics (L. W. Hong, S. S. Sastroutomo, I. G. Caunter, J. Ali, L. K. Yeang, S. Vijaysegaran and Y. H. Sen eds.). The National Council for Biological Control (NCBC)/CAB International, South East Asian Regional Centre, Malaysia. pp 43-47.
Sudhikumar, A.V., Mathew, M J., Sunish, E. and Sebastian, P.A. (2005). Seasonal variation in spider abundance in Kuttanad rice agroecosystem, Kerala, India (Araneae). Eur Arachnol, 1: 181-190.
Citation Format
How to Cite
Goswami, T. N., Yadav, M., Anil, A., & Ray, S. N. (2016). Effect of chemical vis-a-vis non-chemical pest management on predatory spiders in paddy-ecosystem. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(1), 437–440. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i1.812
More Citation Formats:
Research Articles