Vivek Sharma Vijay Kumar S.C. Sharma Sukhvinder Singh


Front line demonstrations (FLDs) on wheat were conducted on 150 farmers’ fields to demonstrate the impact of drought tolerant rainfed varieties (PBW 175 & PBW 644) and other improved practices techniques (supplemental irrigation and sowing with seed drill) on production and economic benefits in the kandi region of Punjab state during rabi seasons from 2011-12 to 2013-14 under rainfed situation. The improved production technologies recorded additional mean yield of 27.8 q/ha and 28.4 q/ha for rainfed varieties and other improved practices. The per cent average increase in yield of rainfed over local cultivars was 35.3, while 29.1 for other improved practices. The average extension gap, technology gap and technology index were 7.3 q/ha, 8.4 q/ha and 22.5 per cent, respectively in different varieties. FLDs recorded higher B:C ratio of 2.32 and 2.52 for rainfed varieties and other improved practices, respectively. The FLDs conducted on improved technologies during the present study resulted in enhancement of yield, net returns and also increased the knowledge of the farmers. Thus, productivity of wheat could be increased by adopting recommended improved management practices with a suitable high yielding variety under rainfed conditions. The present study resulted in convincing the farming community about potentialities of improved production management technologies of wheat in productivity enhancement and for further adoption by the farming community.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...




FLDs, Rainfed, Supplemental irrigation, Seed drill, Wheat

Anonymous (2013). Statistical Abstracts of Punjab. http://www.esopb.gov.in/static/PDF/Statistical -Abstract-2013.pdf
Dhaka, B.L., Meena, B.S. and Suwalka, R.L. (2010). Popularization of improved maize production technology through frontline demonstrations in south-eastern Rajasthan. J. Agril. Sci. 1(1):39-42.
Dhruw, K.S., Sengar, R.S. and Yadav, K.N. (2012). Level of knowledge and adoption about recommended maize production technology. Agril. Update 7(3&4):311-315.
FAO. 2013. FAO Agricultural Production Statistics, http://faostat3.fao.org/ as accessed on 17 April 2015.
Gurumukhi, D.R. and Mishra, S. (2003). Sorghum front line demonstration - A success story. Agril. Ext. Rev., 15 (4):22-23.
Hiremath, S.M. and Nagaraju, M.V. (2009). Evaluation of front line demonstration trials on onion in Haveri district of Karnataka. Karnataka J. Agril. Sci. 22 (5):1092-1093.
Joshi, A. K., Mishra, B., Chatrath, R., Ortiz Ferrara, G. and Singh, R. P. (2007). Wheat improvement in India: Present status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Euphytica., 157(3): 457-64.
Joshi, N. S., Bariya, M. K. and Kunjadia, B. B. (2014). Yield gap analysis through front line demonstrations in wheat crop. International J. Scientific Res. Pub., 4(9): 1-3.
Katare Subhash, Pandey, S. K. and Mohd. Mustafa (2011). Yield gap analysis of rapeseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agril. Update, 6: 5-7.
Meena B. L., Meena, R. P., Meena, R. R. and Bhim Singh (2014). Popularization of improved maize (Zea mays L.) production technology through frontline demonstrations in semi arid zone IVA of Rajasthan. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 6 (2): 763-769.
Mishra, D.K., Paliwal, D.K., Tailor, R.S. and Deshwal, A.K. (2009). Impact of frontline demonstrations on yield enhancement of potato. Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 9 (3):26-28.
Mitra, Biplab and Samajdar, T. (2010). Yield gap analysis of rapeseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agril. Ext. Rev. (April-June): 16-17.
Nagarajan, S. (2005). Can India produce enough wheat even by 2020? Current Sci. 89: 1467-71.
Narayanaswamy, C. and Eshwarappa, G. (1998). Impact of front line demonstrations.Indian J. Ext. Edu., 34 (1&2):14-15.
Ranawat, Y., Ram, H., Sisodiya, S.S. and Punjabi, N.K. (2011). Adoption of improved maize cultivation practices by trained and untrained farmers of KVK, Udaipur. Rajasthan J. Ext. Edu., 19:144-147.
Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mondal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) in Sundarbans. J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agril. Res., 18 (2):180-183.
Sawardekar, S.V., Dhane, S.S. and Jadhav, B.B. (2003). Front-line demonstration performance of salt-tolerant rice varieties in coastal saline soils. IRRN 28 (1):73-74.
Singh, D.K., Gautam, U. S. and Singh, R. K. (2007). Study on yield gap and level of demonstrated crop production technology in Sagar District. Indian J. Ext. Edu., 7 (2&3):94-95.
Singh, N. and Sharma, F. L. (2004). Impact of front line demonstration on gain in knowledge about mustard production technology among farmers. 2nd National Extension Education Congress, May 22-24, 2004. Society of Extension Education, Agra & MPUAT, Udaipur: 56.
Singh, V., Singh, R. P., and Pawar, K. S. (1995). Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to seed rate and date of sowing. Indian J. Agron., 40(4): 697-99.
Sreelakshmi, C.H., Sameer Kumar, C.V. and Shivani, D. (2012). Productivity enhancement of pigeon pea (Cajanuscajan L.) through improved production technology. Madras Agril. J., 99 (4-6):248-250.
Tiwari, B. K., Aashutosh Sharma, Sahare, K. V., Tripathi, P. N. and Singh, R. R. (2014). Yield gap analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivum) through front line demonstration under limited irrigation conditions. Plant Archives 14 (1): 495-498.
Tiwari, R.B., Singh, V., and Parihar, P. (2003). Role of front line demonstration in transfer of gram production technology. Maharastra J. Ext. Edu. 22 (1): 19.
Citation Format
How to Cite
Sharma, V., Kumar, V., Sharma, S., & Singh, S. (2016). Productivity enhancement and popularization of improved production technologies in wheat through frontline demonstrations. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(1), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i1.810
More Citation Formats:
Research Articles