##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Navkiran Randhawa Jagmeet Kaur Satvir Kaur Sarvjeet Singh

Abstract

The present investigation was aimed to study influence of moisture stress in in vitro identified tolerant (GL28151, RSG963, PDG3) and sensitive (GL22044, GNG1861, PBG1) chickpea genotypes under field conditions. Moisture stress treatments included crop sown with one pre-sowing irrigation (WSVFP), irrigation withheld at flower initiation stage (WSF), irrigation withheld at pod initiation stage (WSP) and control (irrigated as and when required). Osmolytes (in seeds) viz. total soluble sugars, starch, proline, cellular functions; relative water content, membrane permeability index and lipid peroxidation (in leaves), antioxidant enzymes (at pod filling stage) viz. peroxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase were estimated in chickpea seeds under control and stressed conditions. WSVFP was most severely affected by moisture stress followed by WSP and WSF and emphasized on pod intuition stage as critical stage attributable to hindered transport of assimilates towards formation of pods and development of seeds under stress imposed by lack of sufficient moisture. Highest accumulation of total soluble sugars (73.33), starch (73.12), proline (2.04) in mg/g fresh weight, least percentage reduction over control in relative water content (20.3), membrane permeability index (18.8) and minimal lipid peroxidation (31.3) accompanied by significantly enhanced activities of antioxidant enzymes under WSVFP rendered moisture stress tolerance in RSG963. The pronounced cellular damage, lesser alleviation in the content of osmolytes, antioxidant enzymes activity was observed in sensitive genotype GL22044 under stress treatments. High molecular weight protein bands were found either absent or of low intensity in sensitive genotypes (GL22044, GNG1861 and PBG1) under severe stress treatment (WSVFP).

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Biochemicals, Cellular Chickpea, Cicer arietinum, Moisture stress

References
Ali, Q. and Ashraf, M. (2011). Induction of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) due to exogenous application of trehalose: growth, photosynthesis water relations and oxidative defence mechanism. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sci., 1: 1-14.
Basu, P.S., Berger, J.D., Turner, N.C., Chaturvedi, S.K., Ali, M. and Siddique, K.H.M. (2007). Osmotic adjustment of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is not associated with changes in carbohydrate composition or leaf gas exchange under drought. Ann. App. Biol, 150: 217-25.
Bates, L.S., Waldren, R. and Pand-Teare, I.D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for moisture stress studies. Plant Soil, 39: 205-07.
Bernheim, F., Bernheim ,M.L.C. and Wilbur, K.M. (1948). The reaction between thiobarbituric acid and the oxidation products of certain lipids. J. Biol. Chem., 174: 254-64.
Bhatnagar-Mathur, P., Rao, S., Vadez, V., Devi, M.J., Lavanya, M., Vani, G. and Sharma, K.K. (2009). Genetic engineering of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) with the P5CSF129A gene for osmoregulation with implications on drought tolerance. Mol. Breeding 23: 591-06.
Demidchik, V., Straltsova, D., Medvedev, S.S., Pozhvanov, G.A., Sokolik. and Yurin,V. (2014). Stress-induced electrolyte leakage: the role of K±-permeable channels and involvement in programmed cell death and metabolic adjustment. J. Exp. Bot..65: 1259-70.
Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Roberts, P.A. and Smith, F. (1956). Calorimetric methods for the determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem., 28: 350-56.
Esterbauer, H. and Grill, D. (1978). Seasonal variation of glutathione and glutathione reductase in needles of Picea abies. Plant Physiol., 62:119-21.
FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Statistical Databases from http:// www .fao.org (2014).
Fletcher, R.A. and Drexlure, D.M. (1980). Interactions of dichloromethyl and 2, 4-D in cultivated oats (Avena sativa) Weed Sci., 28: 363-66.
Hendry, G.A. (2005). Oxygen free radical process and seed longevity. Seed Sci. J., 3: 141-47.
Kar, M. and Mishra, D. (1976). Catalase, peroxidase and polyphenoloxidase activities during rice leaf senescence. Plant Physiol., 57: 315-19.
Lobato, A.K.S., Costa, R.C.L., Oliveira Neto, C.F., Santos Filho, B.G., Cruz, F.J.R., Freitas ,J.M.N., Cordeiro, F.C. (2008). Morphological changes in soybean under progressive water stress. Int. J. Bot., 4:231-35.
Laemmli, U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 22: 680-85.
Mansourifar, C., Shaban, M., Ghobadi, M. and Ajirlu, A.R. (2011). Effect of drought stress and N fertilizer on yield, yield components and grain storage proteins in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Afr. J. Pl. Sci., 5: 634-42.
Masoumi, H., Darvish, F., Daneshian, J., Normohammadi, G. and Habibi, D. (2011). Effects of water deficit stress on seed yield and antioxidant content in soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 6: 1209-18.
McKersie, B.D., Bowley, S.R., and Jones, K.S. (1999). Winter survival of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiol., 119: 839-47.
Moinuddin and Khanna-Chopra, R. (2004). Osmotic adjustment in chickpea in relation to seed yield and yield parameters. Crop Sci., 44: 449-55.
Nishikimi, M., Rae, N.A. and Yagi, K. (1972). The occurrence of superoxide anion in the action of reduced phenazine methosulphate and molecular oxygen. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 46: 849-53.
Patel, P.K. and Hemantaranjan, A. (2012). Salicylic acid induced alteration in dry matter partitioning, antioxidant defence system and yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress. Asian J. Crop Sci., 4: 86-02.
Patel, P.K., Hemantaranjan, A., Sarma, B.K. and Singh, R. (2011). Growth and antioxidant system under drought stress in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress. Asian J. Crop Sci., 4: 86-02.
Pratap, V., and Sharma, Y.K. (2010). Impact of osmotic stress on seed germination and seedling growth in black gram (Phaseolus mungo). J. Environ. Biol., 31: 721-26.
Raheleh,R., Ramazanali, K.N., Ali, G., Abdolreza, B., Farzaneh, N. and Masoud, R. (2012). Use of biochemical indices and antioxidant enzymes as a screening technique for drought tolerance in Chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Afr. J. Agric. Res., 7: 5372-80.
Sharada , P. and Naik, G.R. (2011). Physiological and biochemical responses of groundnut genotypes to drought stress. World J. Sci.Tech., 1: 60-66.
Sumithra, K. and Reddy, A.R. (2004). Changes in proline metabolism of cowpea seedlings under water deficit. J Plant Biol., 31: 201-04.
Sunkar, R. (2010). Plant stress tolerance. Methods Mol. Biol., 639.
Weatherly, P.E. (1950). Studies of the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurements of water deficits in leaves. New Phytol., 49: 81-87.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Moisture stress induced changes in metabolites and cellular functions in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. (2016). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(1), 225-231. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i1.777