Article Main

Ananth Krishna Manoj Menon Rajesh Patel Komal antaliya

Abstract

Epipelic and epipsammic benthic habitats play a critical role in estuarine ecosystem functioning by regulating nutrient cycling, stabilizing sediments, and supporting primary production. However, these habitats remain poorly studied in Indian estuaries, particularly in the Tapi Estuary, despite increasing anthropogenic pressures. The present study aimed to evaluate the benthic biodiversity of epipelic and epipsammic habitats in the Tapi Estuary and to assess their ecological significance in relation to environmental and seasonal variations. Quarterly sampling was conducted at selected reference and impacted locations within the Tapi Estuary during post-monsoon, winter, and summer seasons. Sediment samples were analyzed for biological parameters, focusing on algal communities and meio- to macrofaunal assemblages. Habitat characteristics and species–environment relationships were examined to identify key regulatory factors influencing community structure. The study revealed distinct spatial and seasonal variations in benthic assemblages. Periphyton density ranged from [89–6336 units/m2 in Epipelic region and 96 – 2458 units/m2 in Epissamic region, while meiofaunal (Zoobenthic) abundance varied between 52 – 550  Number/m2 in Epipelic region and 25 – 284 Number/m2 in Epissamic region across seasons. Impacted locations exhibited reduced diversity and dominance of pollution-tolerant taxa, indicating stress from industrial and domestic effluents. This study represents one of the first integrated assessments of epipelic and epipsammic biodiversity in the Tapi Estuary. The findings highlight the potential of benthic communities as sensitive indicators of water quality and ecosystem health, providing valuable baseline data for estuarine monitoring, management, and conservation under escalating anthropogenic influence.

Article Details

Article Details

Keywords

Benthic biodiversity, Epipelic, Epissammic, Inter-tidal sediments

References
Aberle, N. & Wiltshire, K. H. (2006). Seasonality and diversity patterns of microphytobenthos in a mesotrophic lake. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 167(1–4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0167-0447
Aklilu, T., Sahilu, G., Ambelu, A. & Mehari, B. (2025). Positive matrix factorization in distinguishing water pollution sources in Upper Awash River Basin, Ethiopia. Water Science, 39(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/23570008.2025.2464348
Colijn, F. & Dijkema, K. (1981). Species composition of benthic diatoms and distribution of chlorophyll a on an intertidal flat in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 4, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps004009.
Costanza, R.; de Groot, R.; Sutton, P.; van der Ploeg, S.; Anderson, S.J.; Kubiszewski, I.; Farber, S.& Turner, R.K. (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang., 26, 152–158.
Curry, Colin & Curry, R. & Baird, Donald. (2012). The contribution of riffles and riverine wetlands to benthic macroinvertebrate biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21. 895-913. 10.1007/s10531-011-0219-5.
Dash, S., Satpathy, K. K., Sahu, G. & Mohanty, A. K. (2022). Macrobenthic community structure under varying degrees of anthropogenic stress in a tropical estuary (Mahanadi Estuary, India). Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 1008912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1008912.
Dyer, K.R., Coastal and estuarine sediment dynamic, John Wiley & sons, New York 342, pp. 1986.)
Envirothon Aquatic Ecology Committee (2025). Aquatic ecology study guide (Envirothon2025). Saidaquan.
https://static.saidaquan.com/competitions/envirothon-2025/files/aquatic-ecology-2025.pdf
Finnsson, H., Chambers, C. & Guðbergsson, G. (2025). Invasive species management: The case of pink salmon in Iceland. Marine Policy, 173, 106539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106539
Frithsen, J. B. & Holland, A. F. (1992). Benthic Communities as Indicators of Ecosystem Condition (pp. 459–460).
Ganugapenta, S., Rao, V. R. & Kumar, A. A. (2025). Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as indicators of trace metal pollution in a tropical estuary (Beypore Estuary, southwest India). Environmental Earth Sciences, 84, 115.
Haro, S., Lara, M., Laiz, I., González, C. J., Bohórquez, J., Garcia-Robledo, E., Corzo, A. & Papaspyrou, S. (2020). Microbenthic net metabolism along intertidal gradients (Cadiz Bay, SW Spain): Spatio-temporal patterns and environmental factors. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00 039
Hašler, P., Štěpánková, J., Špačková, J., Neustupa, J., Kitner, M., Hekera, P., Veselá, J., Burian, J. & Poulíčková, A. (2008). Epipelic cyanobacteria and algae: A case study from Czech ponds. Fottea, 8(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.5507/fot.2008.012.
Hickman, M. (1974). Effects of discharge of thermal effluent from a power station on Lake Wabamun, Alberta, Canada--The epipelic and epipsammic algal communities. Hydrobiologia, 45, 199-215.
Insulaire, F., Lamouroux, N., Barillier, A., Paillex, A., Capra, H., Cattaneo, F. & Gouraud, V. (2024). Characterizing the effects of morphological microstructures and hydropeaks on fish stranding in rivers. River Research and Applications, 40(5), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4277
Moss, B. (1977). Adaptations of epipelic and epipsammic freshwater algae. Oecologia, 28(1), 103–108.
Mulik, J., Ansari, Z. A., Ingole, B. S. & Gaonkar, U. (2020). Can the ecological status of three differentially impacted monsoonal tropical estuaries in northwest India be adequately assessed by a common estuarine benthic index? Ecological Indicators, 117, 106642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106642
Neba, G. A., Anyinkeng, N., Mumbang, C. & Fonge, A. B. (2021). Benthic algal community in relationship to perturbation in the Tiko Mangrove Estuary, Cameroon. Open Journal of Ecology, 11(7), 540–564. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2021.117035
Nzeako, S., Imafidor, H., Uche, A. & Udofia, I. (2015). Nematodes of New Calabar River: A tropical freshwater body.
Ranjana, S., Mohini, G. & Ekhalak, A. (2007). Assessment of physico-chemical characteristics and pollution status of Tapi Estuary at Dumas Jetty, Surat. Journal of Environmental Research and Development, 2(10).
Reddy, R. V., Gireeshkumar, T. R. & Rao, V. R. (2019). Benthic foraminiferal response to ecosystem pollution in the Uppanar Estuary, southeast coast of India. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 93(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-019-1184-3
Rhee, G. & Gotham, I. J. (1981). The effect of environmental factors on phytoplankton growth: Temperature and the interactions of temperature with nutrient limitation. Limnology and Oceanography, 26(4), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.4.0635.
Round, F. E. (1981). The Ecology of Algae. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Sanil Kumar, V., Gupta, G. V. M. & Naik, H. (2014). Distribution and biomass of microphytobenthos in a tropical estuary (Cochin Estuary, India). Journal of the National Academy of Sciences, India – Section B: Biological Sciences, 84(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0193-4
Stevenson, R. J., Bothwell, M. L. & Lowe, R. L. (1996). Algal ecology: Freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press.
Wine, M. L. (2024). Irrigation water use driving desiccation of Earth’s endorheic lakes and seas. Australasian Journal of Water Resources, 28(1), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2022.2141333.
Whitelam, G. C., Lanaras, T. & Codd, G. A. (1983). Rapid separation of microalgae by density gradient centrifugation in Percoll. British Phycological Journal, 18(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071618300650031
Yoshioka, H. & Hamagami, K. (n.d.). Micro–macro population dynamics models of benthic algae with long-memory decay and generic growth.
Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, J., Wang, J. & Li, Y. (2023). Shifts in periphyton research themes over the past three decades. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 5281–5295
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Benthic biodiversity assessment in epipelic and epissamic habitats of Tapi Estuary, Surat, Gujarat. (2026). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 18(1), 232-249. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v18i1.7165