Sustainable management of Urban river ecosystem services: A systematic literature review on community engagement and environmental behavior in Indonesia
Article Main
Abstract
Rivers play a pivotal role in providing essential ecosystem services and natural resources that are crucial for both human and ecological well-being. However, inappropriate exploitation of river ecosystems can jeopardize their ability to deliver these services, posing significant risks to human welfare and environmental sustainability in the future. Therefore, restoring degraded river ecosystems is crucial to ensuring the sustainability of environmental provisions to meet current and future demands. In urban settings, rivers hold particular significance in maintaining the sustainability of water resources. Batang Arau, a major river flowing through the heart of Padang City, Indonesia. serves as a critical resource supporting various community needs and activities. The river provides essential ecosystem services, including raw water for the municipal water supply (PDAM), as well as support for bathing, washing, sanitation, agriculture, and livestock. Additionally, its estuary supports vital transportation services, functioning as an inter-island shipping port on the West Coast of West Sumatra. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, reviewing scholarly articles from Google Scholar, Elsevier, and ScienceDirect. The TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, and Methodology) framework was used to classify research and identify knowledge gaps, thereby paving the way for future research directions. Sustainable management of the river's ecosystem services can be achieved through a sociocultural assessment approach, emphasizing environmental behavior via the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP), and an economic approach through Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES). These strategies can inform policies and programs that mitigate environmental degradation by actively involving community participation.
Article Details
Article Details
Environmental Services, New Ecological Paradigm, Payment for Ecosystem Services, Social-cultural, Willingness to pay
Aderibigbe. (2018). Covariance structure analysis of health-related indicators in elderly people living at home, focusing on subjective health Energies, 6(1), 1–8. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1120700020921110%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.reuma.2018.06.001%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.044%0Ahttps://reader.els evi er.com/reader/sd/pii/S1063458420300078?token=C03 9B8B13922A2079230DC9AF11A333E 295FCD8
Chen, Y., & Vardon, M. (2024). Accounting for water-related ecosystem services to provide information for water policy and management: An Australian case study. Ecosystem Services, 69(August 2023), 101658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101658
Cordoves-Sánchez, M., & Vallejos-Romero, A. (2019). Social construction of risk in non-conventional renewable energy: Risk perception as a function of ecosystem services in La Araucanía, Chile. Ecological Economics, 159(January), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.031
Findasari, F., Pratamana, T. G., Firmansyah, N. A., Intakoris, S., Fitria, H., & Shafira, N. P. (2022). Pengelolaan Dan Pengolahan Sampah Dalam Usaha Mengurangi Limbah Sampah Di Lingkungan Desa Bae Kudus. Jurnal Abdimas Indonesia, 4(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.2 6751/jai.v4i2.1810
Fraccascia, L., Giannoccaro, I., & Albino, V. (2021). Ecosystem indicators for measuring industrial symbiosis. Ecological Economics, 183(June 2020), 106944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106944
Georgiou, D., Liliopoulos, V., & Aivasidis, A. (2020). Upgrading of biogas by utilizing aqueous ammonia and the alkaline effluent from air-stripping of anaerobically digested animal manure. Application on the design of a semi-industrial plant unit. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 36(January), 101318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101318
Glavan, M., Cvejić, R., Zupanc, V., Knapič, M., & Pintar, M. (2020). Agricultural production and flood control dry detention reservoirs: Example from Lower Savinja Valley, Slovenia. Environmental Science and Policy, 114(March), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.012
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90–91(November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Hasibuan, G. C. R., Al Fath, M. T., Yusof, N., Dewi, R. A., Syafridon, G. G. A., Jaya, I., Anas, M. R., & Syahrizal. (2025). Integrating circular economy into construction and demolition waste management: A bibliometric review of sustainable engineering practices in the built environment. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 11(February), 101159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2025.101159
Hussain, D. I., Elomri, D. A., Kerbache, D. L., & Omri, D. A. El. (2024). Smart city solutions: Comparative analysis of waste management models in IoT-enabled environments using multiagent simulation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 103(February), 105247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105247
Kim, Y., Lee, H. S., Choi, J., Kim, K. H., & Ozyer, C. (2022). Comparison among brittleness, hardness and mineral composition of the Besa River Formation in the Liard Basin, Canada. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 103(October 2021), 104632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104632
Krishnan, S., Zulkapli, N. S., Kamyab, H., Taib, S. M., Din, M. F. B. M., Majid, Z. A., Chaiprapat, S., Kenzo, I., Ichikawa, Y., Nasrullah, M., Chelliapan, S., & Othman, N. (2021). Current technologies for recovery of metals from industrial wastes: An overview. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 22, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101525
Ozkeser, B. (2019). Impact of training on employee motivation in human resources management. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 802–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.117
Padmadewi, N. N., Artini, L. P., Ratminingsih, N. M., Suhardiana, I. P. A., Zamzam, A., & Juniarta, P. A. K. (2023). Designing Project-Based Learning in Research Proposal Writing: Its Effect, Problems, and Scaffolding Utilized. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 841–862. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.27408
Petersen, G., Meulenbroek, P., Scheikl, S., Bräuner, M., & Schinigger, R. (2022). NBI Technical Reports : Wetlands and Biodiversity Series Nile Basin Wetlands Ecosystem Services Assessment Methodology WRM / WBS-2022-08 Authors.
Qu, G., Zhao, J., & Wu, G. L. (2025). Water availability mediates elevational responses of ecosystem respiration to warming in Tibetan semi-arid montane meadows. Global Ecology and Conservation, 62, e03710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03710
Radicic, D., Pugh, G., & Douglas, D. (2020). Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 54(1), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0088-3
Sieber, I. M., Campagne, C. S., Villien, C., & Burkhard, B. (2021). Mapping and assessing ecosystems and their services: a comparative approach to ecosystem service supply in Suriname and French Guiana. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/2639591 6.20 21.1896580
Souliotis, I., & Voulvoulis, N. (2021). Incorporating Ecosystem Services in the Assessment of Water Framework Directive Programmes of Measures. Environmental Management, 68(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01478-7
Sumarga, E., Willemen, L., Rosleine, D., Fitria, F. S., Agatha, K., & Sinaga, N. (2024). Water provision benefits from karst ecosystems: An example for Watuputih groundwater basin, North Kendeng Mountain, Indonesia. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 24(October), 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100518
Teo, H. C., Lechner, A. M., Walton, G. W., Chan, F. K. S., Cheshmehzangi, A., Tan-Mullins, M., Chan, H. K., Sternberg, T., & Campos-Arceiz, A. (2019). Environmental impacts of infrastructure development under the belt and road initiative. Environments - MDPI, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6060072
Xie, X., & Wang, H. (2020a). How can open innovation ecosystem modes push product innovation forward? An fsQCA analysis. Journal of Business Research, 108(June 2019), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.201 9.10.011
Xie, X., & Wang, H. (2020b). How can open innovation ecosystem modes push product innovation forward? An fsQCA analysis. Journal of Business Research, 108(November 2019), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.011
Yang, H., & Deng, L. (2020). Using air instead of biogas for mixing and its effect on anaerobic digestion of animal wastewater with high suspended solids. Bioresource Technology, 318(August), 124047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124047
Zafar, M. W., Zaidi, S. A. H., Khan, N. R., Mirza, F. M., Hou, F., & Kirmani, S. A. A. (2019). The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States. Resources Policy, 63(June), 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
