Article Main

Vasanth P Sivakumar K Jeyajothi R Chandrasekaran P

Abstract

Applying urea is becoming more and more rapidly rising worldwide; nonetheless, the present study aimed to investigate the influence of using nitrogen fertilizer in the soil application in conjunction with foliar spraying of urea and nano-urea on the yield and economics of maize (Syngenta NK 6802) crop during rabi season of 2024. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with seven treatments T1 : 100 % RDF, T2 : 75% RDF, T3 :  75% RDF + foliar spray of urea @ 0.5% at knee height and tasselling stage, T4 :  75% + RDF foliar spray of urea @ 1% at knee height and tasselling stage, T5 : 75% RDF + foliar spray of nano-urea @ 0.2% at knee height and tasselling stage, T6 : 75% RDF + foliar spray of nano-urea @ 0.3% at knee height and tasselling stage, T7 : 75% RDF + foliar spray of nano-urea @ 0.4% at knee height and tasselling stage. Among the treatment 4 recorded significantly highest Plant height (139.83 cm), TDMP (94.32 g), Cob length (19 cm), Number of grains per row (24.67), Number of rows per cob (14.43), Stover yield (8636 kg/ha), Grain yield (6415 kg/ha), Gross return (₹ 166910.91), Net return (₹ 124169.68) and B: C ratio (2.91) as well as improving nutrient uptake and its efficiency. Therefore, the phenology, growth, yield, and profitability of maize and nitrogen fertiliser applications have been structured as per this combination of uptake to avoid losses by leaching and crop response.


 

Article Details

Article Details

Keywords

Economics, Foliar spray, Grain yield, Maize, Nano-urea, Urea

References
Ali, A., M. Hussain, H.S. Habib, T. T. Kiani, M. A. Anees & M.A. Rahman (2016). Foliar spray surpasses soil application of potassium for maize production under rainfed conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 21(1), 36-43.
Alim, M. A., Hossain, S. I., Ditta, A., Hasan, M. K., Islam, M. R., Hafeez, A. S. M. G., Khan, M. A. H., Chowdhury, M. K., Pramanik, M. H., Al-Ashkar, I., El Sabagh, A., & Islam, M. S. (2023). Comparative Efficacy of Foliar Plus Soil Application of Urea versus Conventional Application Methods for Enhanced Growth, Yield, Agronomic Efficiency, and Economic Benefits in Rice. ACS Omega, 8(39), 35845–35855. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c0 3483.
Arshad, M. 2021. Fortnightly dynamics and relationship of growth, dry matter partition and productivity of maize based sole and intercropping systems at different
elevations. European Journal of Agronomy, 130, 126377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126377.
Arunkumar, M. R., P. S. Fathima, S. B. Yogananda and B. G. Shekara. 2024. Influence of foliar application of nano urea and urea on productivity and nutrient status of fodder maize during kharif season. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International. 46(5), 428-434.
Awwad, M. S., Bayoumi, M. A and Eid, T. A. 2018. Foliar Urea As a Supplement of Soil Nitrogen Application for Wheat Grown Under Different Planting Methods.
Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 45(3), 945–962. https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2018.49137
FAO. 2022. World Food and Agriculture-Statistical yearbook. Rome
Gomez, K. A and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. John Wiley Sons, New York. 680.
Mahil, E. I. T and Kumar, B. A. (2019). Foliar application of nanofertilizers in agricultural crops–A review. J. Farm Sci, 32(3), 239-249.
Martins, K. V., Dourado-Neto, D., Reichardt, K., Favarin, J. L., Sartori, F. F., Felisberto, G and Mello, S. C. 2017. Maize dry matter production and macronutrient extraction model as a new approach for fertilizer rate estimation. Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 89(1), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160525.
Nair, D., Baral, K. R., Abalos, D., Strobel, B. W and Petersen, S. O. 2020. Nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions from maize after grass-clover on a coarse sandy soil: Mitigation potentials of 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP). Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 110165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110165 .
Nasar, J., Z. Shao, A. Arshad, F. G. Jones, S. Liu, C. Li, M. Z. Khan, T. Khan, J. S. K. Banda, X. Zhou and Q. Gao. 2020. The effect of maize-alfalfa intercropping on the physiological characteristics, nitrogen uptake and yield of maize. Plant Biology. 22(6): 1140-1149.
Nayak, H. S., Parihar, C. M., Mandal, B. N., Patra, K., Jat, S. L., Singh, R., Singh, V. K., Jat, M. L., Garnaik, S., Nayak, J and Abdallah, A. M. 2022. Point placement of late vegetative stage nitrogen splits increase the productivity, N-use efficiency and profitability of tropical maize under decade long conservation agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy, 133, 126417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126417
Nduwimana, D. (2020). Optimizing Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Maize Yield under Varying Fertilizer Rates in Kenya. International Journal of Bioresource Science, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30954/2347-9655.02.2020.4
Pan, Y. Q., Tung, S. A., Yang, L., Wang, Y and Zhou, X. B. 2022. Effect of Straw Return and Nitrogen Application Rate on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Double-Season Maize. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 22(1), 660–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00676-w
Rajalakshmi, N., Unnamalai, T and Gopinath, R. 2020. Problems and Prospects in Maize Cultivation with Reference to Perambalur District - A Study. International Journal of Management, 11(11), 3044–3053.
Reddy, K. S., Shivay, Y. S., Kumar, D., Pooniya, V., Prasanna, R., Shrivastava, M., Mandi, S., Nayak, S and Baral, K. 2024. Relative Performance of Urea and Nano-urea in Conjunction with Zinc Fertilization on Growth, Productivity, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Spring Wheat. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2050(0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01780-3.
Samui, S., Sagar, L., Sankar, T., Manohar, A., Adhikary, R., Maitra, S and Praharaj, S. 2022. Growth and productivity of rabi maize as influenced by foliar application of urea and nano-urea. Crop Research, 57(3), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.019.
Sanaullah, A. B., Khan, A., Rahman, W. U., Nasrullah, A., Khan, M. A. R and Ullah, I. 2020. Estimating cost and net return: A profitability comparison of maize and potato in District Upper Dir of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Econ. Surv., 19. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/16.2.444-453.
Shah, A. N., Y. Wu, M. Tanveer, A. Hafeez, S. A. Tung, S. Ali and G. Yang. 2021. Interactive effect of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on photosynthetic and agronomical traits of cotton at different growth stages. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 28(6), 3578-3584
Singh, B. 2021. Agronomic Benefits of Neem Coated Urea – A Review Agronomic Benefits of Neem Coated Urea – A Review. Report, October. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10647.98722.
Tollenaar, M and W. Migus. 1984. Dry matter accumulation of maize grown hydroponically under controlled environment and field conditions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 64(3), 475-485.
Wierzbowska, J., S. Sienkiewicz and A. Swiatły. 2022. Yield and nitrogen status of maize (Zea mays L.) fertilized with solution of urea-ammonium nitrate enriched with P, Mg or S. Agronomy. 12(9), 2099.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Foliar spray of urea and nano-urea in yield and economics of maize (Zea mays L.). (2025). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 17(1), 383-388. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v17i1.6178