##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

B. L. Meena R. P. Meena R. R. Meena Bhim Singh

Abstract

Front line demonstrations (FLD,s) on maize (Zea mays L.) were laid down at 661 farmers’ fields to demonstrate production potential and economic benefits of improved production technologies comprising high yielding varieties namely PM-3, PM-5, PEHM-2, Bio- 9681 and Mahyco 3765 in Rajsamand district of Semi Arid Zone IVa of Rajasthan state during kharif seasons from 2006 to 2012 in rainfed farming situation. The improved production technologies recorded an additional yield ranging from 2.50 to 15.78 qha-1 with a mean of 7.94 qha-1. The per cent increase yield under improved production technologies ranged from 33.17 to 68.16 (PM-3), 14.09 to 59.82 (PM-5), 46.61 to 66.97 (PEHM-2), 55.83 to 92.82 (Bio 9681) and 80.12 (Mahyco 3765) in respective years. The average extension gap, technology gap and technology index were 9.10 qha-1, 5.94 qha-1 and 20.08 per cent, respectively in different varieties of maize. The improved production technologies gave higher benefit cost ratio ranging from 1.28 to 3.00 with a mean of 2.45 compared to local checks (1.10) being grown by farmers under locality. The productivity of maize per unit area could be increased by adopting feasible scientific and sustainable management practices with a suitable variety. Considering the above facts, frontline demonstrations were carried out in a systematic and scientific manner on farmer’s field to show the worth of a new variety and convincing farming community about potentialities of improved production management technologies of maize for further adoption by the farming community.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Front Line Demonstrations, Maize, Production technology, Zea mays

References
Anonymous (2011). Vision 2030. Directorate of Maize Research, Pusa, New Delhi (India).
Anonymous (2012-13). Rajasthan Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Directorate of Agriculture, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
Dhaka, B.L., Meena, B.S. and Suwalka, R.L. (2010). Popularization of improved maize production technology through frontline demonstrations in south-eastern Rajasthan. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(1):39-42.
Dhruw, K.S., Sengar, R.S. and Yadaw, K.N. (2012). Level of knowledge and adoption about recommended maize production technology. Agriculture Update, 7(3&4):311-315.
Gurumukhi, D.R. and Mishra, S. (2003). Sorghum front line demonstration - A success story. Agriculture Extension Review, 15(4):22-23.
Haque, M.S. (2000). Impact of compact block demonstration on increase in productivity of rice. Maharastra Journal of Extension Education, 19(1):22-27.
Hassan, R.M., Onyango, R. and Rutto, J.K. (1998). Relevance of Maize Research in Kenya to Maize Production Problems Perceived by Farmers. In: RM Hassan (Ed.): A GIS Application for Research Planning in Kenya. Oxon: CAB International.
Hiremath, S.M. and Nagaraju, M.V. (2009). Evaluation of front line demonstration trials on onion in Haveri district of Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22 (5):1092-1093.
Hiremath, S.M., Nagaraju, M.V.and Shashidhar, K.K. (2007). Impact of front line demonstrations on onion productivity in farmer’s field. Paper presented In: National Seminar on Appropriate Extension Strategies for Management of Rural Resources, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, December 18-20, p.100.
Joshi, P.K., Singh, N.P., Singh, N.N., Gerpacio, R.V. and Pingali, P.L. (2005). Maize in India: Production Systems, Constraints, and Research Priorities. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Yadav, V.P.S. and Kumar, R. (2010). Impact assessment of frontline demonstrations of Bajra in Haryana state. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 10 (1):105-108.
Kumaran, M, Vijayaragavan, K. (2005). Farmers’ satisfaction of agricultural extension services in an irrigation command area. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 41 (3&4):8-12.
Mishra, D.K., Paliwal, D.K, Tailor, R.S., Deshwal, A.K. (2009). Impact of frontline demonstrations on yield enhancement of potato. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 9 (3):26-28.
Narayanaswamy, C., Eshwarappa, G. (1998). Impact of front line demonstrations. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 34(1&2):14-15.
Nazrul Islam, M., Rezual Karim Md and Safigual Islam Q.M. (2004). Economic performance of BARI Mash 1 (Improved variety of Black gram) with traditional variety at farmers fields of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 3:247-250.
Ouma, J.H., De Groote and Gethi, M. (2002). Focused Participatory Rural Appraisal of farmer’s perceptions of maize varieties and production constraints in the Moist Transitional Zone in Eastern Kenya. IRMA Socio-Economic Working Paper No. 02-01. Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT and KARI.
Ranawat, Y., Ram H., Sisodiya, S.S. and Punjabi, N.K. (2011). Adoption of improved maize cultivation practices by trained and untrained farmers of KVK, Udaipur. Rajasthan Journal of Extension Education, 19:144-147.
Sain Dass, Singh, K.P. and Yadav, V.K. (2007). Present status and potential of maize hybrids in enhancing the productivity. National Conference on “Doubling Maize Production” organized by IFFCO Foundation, ICAR, DMR, DAC and IFFCL at New Delhi from May 08-09, 2007. p.13-19.
Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mondal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) in Sundarbans. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research, 18 (2):180-183.
Sawardekar, S.V., Dhane, S.S. and Jadhav, B.B. (2003). Front-line demonstration performance of salt-tolerant rice varieties in coastal saline soils. IRRN, 28 (1):73-74.
Sharma, O.P. (2003). Moth bean yield improvement through Front Line Demonstrations. Agriculture Extension Review, 15 (5):11-13.
Singh, D.K., Gautam, U.S. and Singh, R.K. (2007). Study on Yield Gap and Level of Demonstrated Crop Production Technology in Sagar District. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 7 (2&3):94-95.
Singh, N. and Sharma, F.L. (2004). Impact of front line demonstration on gain in knowledge about mustard production technology among farmers. 2nd National Extension Education Congress, May 22-24, 2004. Society of Extension Education, Agra & MPUAT, Udaipur: 56.
Sreelakshmi, C.H., Sameer Kumar, C.V. and Shivani, D. (2012). Productivity enhancement of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) through improved production technology, Madras Agricultural Journal, 99 (4-6):248-250.
Tiwari, K.B. and Saxena, A. (2001). Economic Analysis of FLD of oil seeds in Chindwara. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 16 (3&4):185-189.
Tiwari, R.B., Singh, V. and Parihar, P. (2003). Role of front line demonstration in transfer of gram production technology. Maharastra Journal of Extension Education, 22 (1): 19.
Tomar, R.K.S., Sahu, B.L., Rupendra, K., Singh and Prajapati, R.K. (2009). Productivity enhancement of black gram (Vignamungo L. ) through improved production technologies in farmers’ field. Journal of Food Legumes, 22(3):202-204.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Popularization of improved maize (Zea mays L.) production technology through frontline demonstrations in semi arid zone IVA of Rajasthan. (2014). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 6(2), 763-769. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v6i2.533