##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Ashish Kumar

Abstract

The age old enigma of mango malformation control is still unresolved and eluding the scientists to develop a proper control for the malady. Strengthening of the mango genetic resource base for tolerance traits may seem to be viable criteria of research. Though, prior studies have been undertaken in mango malformation incidence, but screening of large set of germ plasm for tolerance traits in multiple years has so far been a lacuna. The current study evaluated the genetic resource comprising of 65 mango varieties for three consecutive years under natural conditions for incidence of floral malformation. The mean malformation incidence varied from 0.47 % to 60.24%. This study revealed that a group of seven varieties namely Bangalora, Baneshan, Dahiyar, Rammanna, Shakul and Safeda showed resistant type of reaction during both the years of evaluation. However, Moovandan showed highly susceptible type of reaction during both the years. Similarly, germplasm were categorized under moderately resistant, moderately susceptible and susceptible category on the basis of their reaction to malformation incidence.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Floral malformation, Inflorescence type, Mangifera indica

References
Chakrabarti, D.K., Singh, A. and Singh, K. (1990). Physiological and biochemical changes induced in accumulated mangiferin in Mangifera indica L. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 65: 731–737.
Chakraborti, K. and Misra, D.K. (2014). Evaluation of taxa for tolerance agaimst floral malformation in Gangetic West Bengal. Universal Journal of Plant Sciences, 2(2): 27–30.
Freeman, S., Maimon, M. and Pinkas, Y. (1999). Use of GUS transformants of Fusarium subglutinans for determining etiology of mango malformation disease. Phytopathology, 89: 456–61.
Hafiz, I.A., Ahmad, S., Abbasi, N.A., Anwar, R., Chatha, Z.A. and Grewal, A.G. (2008). Intensity of panicle malformation in mango (Mangifera indica L.) varieties. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 45(4): 418–423.
Haggag, W.M. (2010). Mango diseases in Egypt. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 1(3): 285-289.
Kumar, J., Singh, U.S. and Beniwal, S.P.S. (1993). Mango malformation: One hundred years of research. Annual review of Phytopathology, 31: 217-232.
Perrier, X. and Jacquemound-Collet, J.P. (2006). DARwin software. Retrieved from www.darwin.cirad.fr/darwin
Ploetz, R.C. and Gregory, N.F. (1993). Mango malformation in Florida: distribution of Fusarium subglutinans in affected trees, and relationships among strains within and among different orchards. Acta Horticulturae, 341:388–94.
Ploetz, R.C., Zentmyer, G.A., Nishijima, W.T., Rohrbach, K.G. and Ohr, H.D. (1994). Compendium of Tropical Fruit Diseases. APS Press, St Paul, MN, USA.
Ram, R.B., Singh, B.P. and Singh, S.P. (1990). Studies on malformation of mango (Mangifera indica L.) inflorescence with reference to varieties and age of the tree. Horticultural Journal, 3: 31-36.
Singh, V.K. (2006). Physiological and biochemical changes with special reference to mangiferin and oxidative enzymes levels in malformation resistant and susceptible cultivars of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 108: 43-48.
Singh, V.K., Saini, J.P. and Misra, A.K. (1998). Mango malformation in relation to physiological parameters under elevated temperature. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 3: 231–233.
Varma, A., Raychaudhary, S.P., Lele, V.C. and Ram, A. (1971). Preliminary investigations on epidemiology and control of mango malformation. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy, 57: 291–300.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Screening of mango genetic resource for tolerance against its malformation incidence in Madhya Pradesh, India. (2014). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 6(2), 612-618. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v6i2.505