##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Jagdish Singh M. S. Hadda

Abstract

The magnitude of yield reduction due to soil compaction is variable and depends on the soil type, fertility status and other soil and environmental factors. The present investigation was carried out at the research farm, Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of different levels of subsoil compaction and nitrogen fertilization on maize phenology, yield and heat use efficiency. The C2 (subsoil bulk density (Db)= >1.8 Mg m-3) treatment reduced yield by 15.5 and 24.3 % and heat use efficiency (HUE) by 15.2 and 20.9 % than that in C0 (subsoil Db=1.55-1.65 Mg m-3) treatment during the year 2012 and 2013, respectively. The tasseling and silking stage was delayed, while physiological maturity was advanced under C2 subsoil compaction treatment than that in C0 treatment. The N2 treatment improved the yield by 14.9 and 13.9 % and HUE by 15.2 and 14.3 % than that in N0 treatment during the year 2012 and 2013, respectively. Maize took more days to reach physiological maturity under N2 treatment as compared to N0 treatment. Phenothermal index (PTI) showed that crop reached different stages earlier under C1 and C2 than that of C0. The data emphasized the need to take care of soil strength and soil temperature related parameters along with weather conditions for better yield prediction using thermal time.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Accumulated growing degree days (AGDD), Heat use efficiency (HUE), Nitrogen levels, Phenology, Phenothermal index (PTI), Subsoil compaction

References
Abu-Hamdeh, N.H. (2003). Compaction and subsoiling effects on corn growth and soil bulk density. Soil Science Society America Journal, 67: 1213–19.
Abayomi, Y. A. and Adedoyin, G. A. (2004). Effect of planting date and fertilizer application growth and yield of contrasting maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes II: Morphophysiological growth characters and their contribution to grain yield. Nigerian Journal Pure & Applied Science, 19: 1641-1652.
Ali, K., Munsif, F., Din, I. U., Khan, A. and Khan N. (2012). Maize phenology as affected by tillage practices and nitrogen sources. Agricultural Sciences Research Journal, 2:453-458.
Allmaras, R.R. Kraft, J.M. and Miller, D.E. (1988). Effects of soil compaction and incorporated crop residue on root health. Annal Review Phytopath ology, 26: 219-43.
Anonymous (2012) Package of practices for crops of Punjab: Kharif 2012. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. 29(1): 18-30.
Dawadi, D.R. and Sah, S.K. (2012). Growth and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to planting density and nitrogen levels during winter season in Nepal. Tropical Agricultural Research, 23: 218-27.
Domzal, H., Glinski, J. and Lipiec, I. (1991). Soil compaction research in Poland. In: Van Ouwerkerk, C. (Ed.), Soil Compaction and Plant Productivity, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 99–109.
Ellis, R.H., Hadley, P., Roberts, E.H. and Summerfield, R.J. (1990). Relations between temperature and crop development. In Jackson, M. Ford-Lloyd, B. V. and Parry, M. L. (Eds) Climate change and plant genetic resources, Belhaven Press, London, pp 85-115.
Flowers, M. and Lal, R. (1998). Axle load and tillage effect on soil physical properties and soybean grain yield on a Mollic Ochraqualf in Northwest Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research, 48: 21-35.
Gajri, P.R., Arora, V.K. and Chaudhary, M.R. (1994). Maize growth responses to deep tillage straw mulching and farmyard manure in a coarse textured soils of NW India. Soil Use Management, 10: 15-20.
Gaultney, L., Krutz, G.W., Steinhardt, G.C. and Liljedahl (1980). Field and laboratory tests to determine effects of subsoil compaction on corn yield. ASAE paper no 80- 1011. ASAE St. Joseph, MI. USA.
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, U K.
Habtegebrial, K., Singh, B.R. and Haile, M. (2007). Impact of tillage and nitrogen fertilization on yield, nitrogen use efficiency of Eragrostis, Trotter and soil properties. Soil and Tillage Research, 94: 55- 63.
Hanway, J.J. (1963). Growth stages of corn (Zea mays L.). Agronomy Journal, 55: 487-92.
Iijima, M., Kono, Y., Yamauchi, A. and Pardales Jr, J. R. (1991). Effects of soil compaction on the development of rice and maize root system. Environment Experimental Botany, 30: 333-42.
Inamullah, Shah, N.H., Rehman, N., Siddiq, M. and Khan, Z. (2011). Phenology, yields and their correlations in popular local and exotic maize hybrids at various nitrogen levels. Sarhad Journal Agriculture, 27: 363-69.
Kumar, R., Ramesh, K., Singh, R.D. and Prasad, R. (2010). Modulation of wild marigold (Tagetes minuta L.) phenophases towards the varying temperature regimes - a field study. Journal Agrometeorology, 12: 234-40.
Motavalli, P.P., Anderson, S.H. and Pengthamkeerati, P. (2003). Surface compaction and poultry litter effects on corn growth, nitrogen availability, and physical properties of a claypan soil. Field Crop Research, 84: 303–18.
Muchow, R.C. (1990). Effect of high temperature on grain-growth in field-grown maize. Field Crop Research, 23:145-58.
Nuttonson, M.Y. (1955). Wheat climatic relationship and use of phenology in ascertaining the thermal and photo thermal units of wheat. Am. Inst. Crop Ecol. Washington D.C.
Ogola, J.B.O., Wheeler, T.R. and Harris, P.M. (2002). Effects of nitrogen and irrigation on water use of maize crops. Field Crop Research, 78:105-17.
Shafi, M., Bakht, Jan M. T., and Shah Z. (2007). Soil C and N dynamics and maize yield as affected by cropping systems and residue management in Northwestern Pakistan. Soil and Tillage Research, 94: 520–29.
Stone, P.J. Sorensen I.B. and Jamieson P.D. (1999). Effect of soil temperature on phenology, canopy development, biomass and yield of maize in a cooltemperate climate. Field Crop Research, 63: 169-78.
Streck, N.A., Lago, I., Gabriel, L.F. and Samboranha, F.K. (2008). Simulating maize phenology as a function of air temperature with a linear and a nonlinear model. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 43: 449-55.
Sur, H.S., Prihar, S.S. and Jalota, S.K. (1980). Effect of rice-wheat and maize-wheat rotation on water transmission and wheat root development in a sandy loam soil of Punjab, India. Soil and Tillage Research, 1: 361-71.
Uhart, S.A. and Andrade, F.H. (1995). Nitrogen deficiency in maize. I. Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter partitioning, and kernel set. Crop Science 35:1376-83.
Uribelarrea, M., Crafts-Brandner, S.J. and Below F.E. (2009). Physiological N response of field-grown maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) with divergent yield potential and grain protein concentration. Plant and Soil, 316: 151-60.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Phenology and thermal indices of maize (Zea mays L.) influenced by subsoil compaction and nitrogen fertilization under semi-arid irrigated conditions. (2014). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 6(2), 349-355. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v6i2.426