Evaluation of safe alternative wetting & drying and its influence on growth, yield and water use of the efficiency of rice (Orzya sativa l.)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Due to the increase in scarcity of freshwater resources available for irrigated agriculture and escalating demand for food around the world, in the future, it will be necessary to produce more food with less water. Due to inadequate or unevenly-distributed rainfall, irrigation is essential to high rice yields. A field experiment of Alternative Wetting and Drying Irrigation (AWDI) was conducted during kharif season 2014 & 2015 at Soil & Water Management Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. The treatments ranged from delayed irrigations of T1 to T6 (10, 15, 20 cm depletion of water level below the ground level, 15cm depletion of water up to maximum tillering, up to panicle initiation & up to 10 days prior to harvest) and continuous submergence (T7) of field irrigation water denoting the application of 5 cm flooded water condition, when the water level in the perforated PVC pipe fell at 10, 15 and 20 cm below ground level respectively. There was a significant (5% level) consequence of plant height, productive tillers, filled grains, yield and Water Use Efficiency (WUE) due to the influence of AWDI. The highest yield (5981 kg/ha) and WUE (7.56 kg/ha/mm) was recorded in treatment T1. Longer water stress resulted in the loss of grain yield to the tune of 500 to 1000 kg/ha. This study found that in sandy loam soil at 10cm depletion of ponded water produced maximum yield (5809 kg/ha, besides the highest B.C ratio of 2.02) and WUE (7.56 kg/ha mm).
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
AWDI, Grain yield, Kharif season, Rice, WUE
Daniela, R., Carrijo Mark, E., Lundy Bruce A. and Linquist. (2017). Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis. J. of Field Crops Research, 203, 173–180.
FAO (2016). FAOSTAT Data (available at: http://faostat3. fao.org/browse/FB/CC/E.
IRRI (2012). World Rice Statistics. Available at www.irri.org.
Kunjammal, P., Subbalakshmi Lokanadhan., Murali Krishnasamy, S., Jawahar. and Ganesamurthy, K. (2020). Effect of Irrigation Practices on Water Use Its Efficiency and Economic Yield in Rice Varieties. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 39 (20): 67-71.
Lampayan, R.M., Rejesus, R.M., Singleton, G.R. and Bouman, B.A.M. (2015). Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for irrigated lowland rice. J. Field Crop Res., 170, 95–108.
Liang, K., Zhong, X., Huang, N., Lampayan, RB., Pan, J., Tian, K. and Liu Y. (2016). Grain yield, water productivity and CH4 emission on irrigated rice in response to water management in south China. J. Agric. Water Management, 163, 319– 331. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.015
Linquist, B., Groenigen, KJ., Adviento-Borbe, MA., Pittelkow, C. and Kessel, C. (2012). An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. J. Glob. Change Biol., 18, 194–209. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02502.x
Linquist, B., Groenigen, KJ., Adviento-Borbe, MA., Pittelkow, C., Kessel C. and Linquist, B. A. (2014). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions, water use, and grain arsenic levels in rice systems. J. Glob Change Biol., 21, 407–417. doi:10.1111/gcb.12701
Mekonnen, M.M. and Hoekstra, A. (2016). Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. J. Sci. Adv. 2, 1–6.
Muhammad Ishfaq., Muhammad Farooq., Usman Zulfiqar., Saddam Hussain., Nadeem Akbar., Ahmad Nawaz. and Shakeel Ahmad Anjum (2020). Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and eco-friendly rice production system. J. Agricultural Water Management, 241 (2020), 106363.
Price, AH., Norton, GJ., Salt, DE., Ebenhoeh, O., Meharg, AA. and Meharg, C. (2013). Alternate wetting and drying irrigation for rice in Bangladesh: is it sustainable and has plant breeding something to offer? J. Food Energy Sec., 2, 120–129. doi:10.1002/fes3.29.
Prihasto Setyanto., Ali Pramono., Terry Ayu Adriany., Helena Lina Susilawati.,Takeshi Tokida., Agnes T. Padre. and Kazunori Minamikawa (2018). Alternate wetting and drying reduces methane emission from a rice paddy in Central Java, Indonesia without yield loss. J.Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 64(1), 23–30. https ://doi.org /10.108 0 /00380768.2017 .1409600.
Savitha, P. and Usha Kumari, R. (2016). Indigenous knowledge of traditional landraces in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in situ conservation of Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 15 (2), 312-329.
Siopongco, J. D. L. C., Wassmann, R. and Sander, B. O. (2013). Alternate wetting and drying in Philippine rice production: feasibility study for a clean development mechanism. IRRI Technical Bulletin No. 17. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Philippines.
Smita Singh., Uma Nath Shukla., Khan, IM., Anchal Sharma., Kshitiz Pawar. and Deepak Srivastawa. (2013). Technologies for Water-saving Irrigation in Rice. International J. of Agriculture and Food Science Technology, 4 (6), 531-536.
Subbalakshmi Lokanadhan (2020). The Performance of Kavuni Rice in the Western zone of Tamil Nadu. Journal of Rice Research, 13(1), 88-90.
USDA (2016). World Rice Production, Consumption, and Stocks. United States Department of Agriculture. Foreign Agricultural Service (Available at: http://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdHome.aspx)
Xu, Y.C., Shen, Q. R., Li, M. L., Dittert, K. and Sattelmacher, B. (2015). Effect of soil water status and mulching on N2O and CH4 emission from lowland rice field in China. J. Biol. Fertil. Soils., 39, 215–217. doi:10.1007/s00374-003-0692-4.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
