Biological confirmation of resistance from segregating populations of Gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.) against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Mar 10, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v11i1.1979

Article Main

Venkatesh H L
Department of plant pathology, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560065 (Karnataka), India
V V Kavyashri
Department of plant pathology, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560065 (Karnataka), India
A. S. Padmaja
Department of plant pathology, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560065 (Karnataka), India
N Nagaraju
Department of plant pathology, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560065 (Karnataka), India
S Ramesh
Department of plant pathology, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560065 (Karnataka), India

Abstract

Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV) is most widespread and destructive disease of gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.) Most of the commercial varieties are susceptible to CMV disease. Thus, identification of resistant genotypes for management of CMV disease in gherkin is essential. A total of 179 F3 progenies derived from crosses of resistant and susceptible parent’s viz., Acc.1 (susceptible) x Acc. 50 (resistant), Acc.3 (susceptible) x Acc.50 (resistant), Acc.48 (susceptible) x Acc 50 (resistant) were screened for CMV. Among 179 F3 families, 7 were Immune, 17 were Resistant, 76 were Moderately Resistant, 73 were Moderately Susceptible and 6 were Susceptible. The immune and resistant progenies were further confirmed for their resistance reaction by aphid transmission. Significant difference between the estimates of PDI or F3 progenies mapped into different response classes justified the classification. 

Article Details

Article Details

Keywords

CMV, F3 Progenies, Gherkin, Resistant, Screening, Susceptible

References
Bos, L. (1982). Crop losses caused by viruses. Crop Prot., 1: 263–282. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0261219482900023
Chandankar, V. D., Mondhe, M. K., Bhoyar, P. R., Ninawe, B. N. and Jadesha, G. (2013). Biophysical characterization, host range and transmission studies of cucumber mosaic virus. Bioscan, 8(2): 437-441. http://www.thebioscan.in/Journals_PDF/8215%20V.%20D.%20CHANDANKAR.pdf
Coudriet, D. L., 1962, Efficiency of various insects as vectors of Cucumber mosaic and Watermelon mosaic viruses in Cantaloups. J. Econ. Entomo., 55(4): 519-520.
Ekbc, E., Fidan, H., Yildiz, M. and Abak, K., 2010, Screening of Turkish melon accessions for resistance to ZYMV, WMV and CMV. Not. Sci. Biol., 2:1. https://www.notulaebiologicae.ro/index.php/nsb/article/view/3555
Gracia, O., 2000, First report of ZYMV in Argentina. Plant Dis., 84: 371. https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/abs/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.371B
Havey, M. J., 1996, CMV resistance in three sources of cucumber. Cucurbit Genet. Coop., 19: 32–33. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/60800500/CGC/CGC%2019%20(1996).pdf#page=42
Kavyashri, V.V., 2014, Survey, biological and molecular characterization and management of cucumber mosaic virus in gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agri. Sci. Bangalore. http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/82019
Krishna Reddy, M., Devaraj, Raman, R., Jalali, S. and Samuel, D. K., 2003, Outbreak of Tobacco streak virus causing necrosis of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and gherkin (Cucumis anguria) in India. Plant Dis. 87(10): 1264. https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/abs/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.10.1264B
Mandal, B., Pappu, H. R. and Culbreath, A. K., 2001, Factors affecting mechanical transmission of tomato spotted virus to peanut (Arachis hypogae). Plant Dis., 85: 1259–1263. https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/abs/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.12.1259
Mugadur, N. S. and Nittur, D. S., 2011, Gherkin cultivation in Haveri district of Karnataka: An economic analysis. Contemporary Res. India, 1(3): 42-50.
Munshi, A. D., Panda, B. and Mandal, B., 2008, Genetics of resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii. Euphytica 164: 501–507. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10681-008-9741-2
Nath, P., 1979, Vegetables for the tropical regions, I.C.A.R. Low priced book series No.2, ICAR, New Delhi. 109pp.
Ribicki, E. P., 1995, Family Bromoviridae. In: MURPHY, F. A., FAUQUET, C. M., BISHOP, D. H. L., GHABRIAL, S. A., JARVIS, A. W., MARTELLI, G. P., MAYO, M. A., SUMMERS, M. D., Virus Taxonomy, Sixth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Springer Verlag, Wien, pp. 450–457
Silbernagel, M. J. and Jafari, A. M., 1974, Temperature effects on curly top resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytopathol., 64: 825–827. http://www.sidalc.net/cgi-bin/wxis.exe/?IsisScript=catalco.xisandmethod=postandformato=2andcantidad=1andexpresion=mfn=054399.
Sukumaran, A., 2007, Gherkin exports may slow on lower demand from Russia. Live Mint Wallstreet J.
Sun Xiudong, Lei, J. and Zhou, S., 2008, Identification of CMV and screening for CMV resistance of pepper in Guangzhou. China vegetables, 6(3): 11-14.
Varma, A. and Giri, B. K., 1998, Virus diseases. In: Nayar NM, More TA Cucurbits. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 225–245.
Viraktamath, C. A., Malik, B., Chandrashekar, S. C., Ramakrishna, B. V. and Praveen, H. M., 2003, Information on insect pests and diseases of gherkin and their management. Univ. Agri. Sci., Bangalore, 33pp.
Issue
Vol 11 No 1 (2019)
Section
Research Articles

This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)

How to Cite

Biological confirmation of resistance from segregating populations of Gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.) against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). (2019). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 11(1), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v11i1.1979