##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

R Jagadeeswaran A Poornima R Kumaraperumal

Abstract

In the present study an attempt was made to perform land use land cover classification at Level-III in order to discriminate and map individual crops. IRS Resources at 2 LISS IV sensor imagery (5.0 m spatial resolution) of September 2014 was utilized for the study. A hybrid classification approach of unsupervised classification followed by supervised classification was adopted to identify and map the crop area in Kodumudi block, Erode district of Tamil Nadu. Signature evaluation was carried out to study the class separability and through cross tabulation and the accuracy was assessed by error matrix. The signature separability analysis to classify various land cover classes indicated that the class viz., waterbody, settlement, sandy area and fallow land were better and for vegetation sub-classes viz., individual crops were poor, which means classification of individual crops was a challenge. The overall accuracy with three different algorithms varied from 56 to 65 per cent and this low accuracy was due to the problem in discriminating the tonal variation and spectral pattern of individual crops in the study area. Thus, classification of vegetation categories into individual crops using LISS IV data resulted in moderate classification accuracy in areas with multiple cropping.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Classification accuracy, LISS IV satellite image, land use land cover, spectral based approach

References
Congalton, R. (1991). A review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, pp. 35-46.
Dengsheng Lu, Scott Hetrick, and Emilio Moran. (2010). Land Cover Classification in a Complex Urban-Rural Landscape with QuickBird Imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 76 (10): 1159–1168.
Dwivedi, R.S., Sreenivas Kandrika and Ramana, K.V. (2004). Comparison of classifiers of remote-sensing data for land-use/land cover mapping. Current Science, 86 (2):328-335.
Gao, Y. and Mas, J.F. (2008). A comparison of the performance of pixel-based and object-based classifications over images with various spatial resolutions. GEOBIA 2008–Pixels, Objects, Intelligence. GEOgraphic Object Based Image Analysis for the 21st Century, (G.J.Hay, T. Blaschke and D. Marceau, editors). University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, ISPRS Vol. No. XXXVIII-4/C1. Archives ISSN No.:1682-1777, pp. 373.
Jaiswal, J.K. and Verma, N. (2013). Land Use Change Detection in Baragaon Block, Varanasi District Using Remote Sensing. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention. 2(7); 49-53.
Jensen, J.R. (1996). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice Hall, London.
Jensen, J.R. and Cowen, D.C. (1999). Remote Sensing of Urban/Suburban Infrastructure and Socio-Economic Attributes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65, pp. 611-622.
Kiran, V.S.S., Srivastava, Y. K. and M. Jagannadha Rao. (2014). Utilization of Resourcesat LISS IV Data for Infrastructure Updation and Land Use / Land Cover Mapping - A Case Study from Simlipal Block, Bankura District, W. Bengal. International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS, ISSN 2320-0243, 3(1):592–597
Koppad, A.G. and Pavan Tikhile. (2012). Anthropogenic impact assessment on forestbiodiversity in coastal region of Uttara Kannada district using RS and GIS technique. The Ecoscan, Special issue, 1:287 - 291
Kumar, V. and Arya,V.S. (2014). Generation of Cadastral Level Information of a Micro-Watershed on Land Use / Land Cover through Geo-informatics. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainability, 2(1):7–11
Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977). A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33, 671-679
Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W. and Chipman, J.W. (2007). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. Fifth Edition, Wiley India, New Delhi
Lu, D. and Weng, Q. (2009). Extraction of urban impervious surface from an IKONOS image. International Journal ofRemote Sensing, 30 (5), 1297-1311.
Lu D, Hetrick S, and Moran E. (2010). Land cover classification in a complex urban-rural landscape with QuickBird imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 76:1159–1168
Mishra, A., Sateesh Karwariya, and Sandeep Goyal. (2012). Land use / Land cover Mapping of Chhatarpur District, Madhya Pradesh, India Using Unsupervised Classification Technique. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 2 (10),pp. 51–56.
Murtaza, K.O. and Romshoo, S.A. (2014). Determining the suitability and accuracy of various statistical algorithms for satellite data classification. International Journal ofGeomatics and Geosciences, 4(4):585-599.
NRSC. (2006). Manual of National Land Use Land Cover Mapping Using Multi-Temporal Satellite Data, Department of Space, Hyderabad.
Ojigi, L.M. (2006). Analysis of spatial variations of Abuja land use and land cover from image classification algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS Commission VII Mid-term Symposium ‘Remote Sensing: From Pixels to Processes’. Enschede, Netherlands.
Patil, M.B, Desai, C.G and Umrikar, B.N. (2012). Image classification tool for land use / land cover analysis: A comparative study of maximum likelihood and minimum distance method. Intl. J. Geology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2(3): 189-196.
Rai, P.K., Sweta, Abhishek Mishra and Mohammad Onagh. (2011). Multi-seasonal IRS-1CLISS III Satellite Data for Change Detection Analysis and Accuracy Assessment: A Case Study. Journal of GIS Trends, 2(1), pp. 13-19.
Richards, J.A. (1993). Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg,New York.
Sailesh Samanta, Babita Pal and Dilip Kumar Pal. (2011). Micro level thematic mapping of land use/ land cover using high spatial resolution satellite data (A case study on PNG UNITECH campus). International Journal ofAdvances in Science and Technology, 3(3), pp. 31–38.
Sahu, N.G.P. Obireddy, Nirmal Kumar, Nagaraju, M.S.S.,Rajeev Srivastava and Singh,S.K. (2014). Characterization of landforms and Land Use/ Land Cover in basaltic terrain using IRS-P6 LISS IV and Cartosat-1 DEM data: A Case Study. ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur, India. Agropedology, 24 (02), pp. 166-178.
Swain, P. H., and Davis, S. M. (1978). Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company
Van de Voorde, T., De Genst,W., Canters, F., Stephenne,N., Wolff, E.,and Binard,M. (2004). Extraction of land use/land cover- related information from very high resolution data in urban and suburban areas. Remote Sensing in Transition, Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium of the European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories, Mill Press, Rotterdam, pp. 237-244.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Mapping and classification of crops using high resolution satellite image. (2018). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 10(3), 818-825. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v10i3.1710