Ethyl Methane Sulphonate induced morphological variations in mulberry (Morus) variety M5
Article Main
Abstract
Present investigation deal with the study of mutagenic effect of Ethyl Methane Sulphonate (EMS) on mulberry variety M5. The results revealed that at 0.4% EMS treatment, height of the plant and leaf area were considerably increased. Stem dichotomy, fusion of leaves, increase in thickness, change in texture of leaves and occurrence of albino and xantha were common in 0.3% EMS treated plants in M1 generation.
Article Details
Article Details
Keywords
M5, EMS, Sprouting, Petiole, Internodal distance, Inflorescence
References
Agastian Sim Yan Theoder, P., Dorcus, D. and Vivekanandan, M. (1995). Screening of mulberry varieties for saline tolerance. Sericologia, 35(2): 487 – 492.
Bhat, S. R., Haque, A. and Chopra, V. L. (2001). Induction of mutants for cytoplasmic male sterility and some rare phenotypes in Indian mustard (Brassica Juncea L.). Indian J. Genet, 61(4): 335 – 340.
Blonstein, A. D. and Gale, M. D. (1984). Cell size and cell number in dwarf mutants of barley in semi dwarf cereal mutants and their use in cross breeding II (Teidsc 407), TFAO/IAEA, Vienna: 19 – 29.
Broertjes, C. and Van Harten, A. M. (1998). Development in crop science 12. Applied mutation breeding for vegetatively propagated crops. Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc, New York, USA. pp: 80 – 84.
Chandramouli. (1970). Mutagen induced dichotomous branching in Maize. J. Heredity. 61:150.
Dandin, S. B. and Jolly, M. S. (1986). Mulberry descriptor. Sericologia, 26(4): 465 – 475.
Dandin, S. B. and Kumar, R. (1989). Evaluation of mulberry genotypes for different growth and yield parameters. In: Genetic resources of mulberry and utilization. Edt. By Sengupta and Dandin, S. B., C.S.R. and T.I., Mysore. pp.142 - 152.
Deshpande, K. N., Mehetre S. S., and Pingle, S. D. (2010). Effect of different mutagens for induction of mutation in Mulberry. Asian J.Exp. Sci. Spl, 104 -108.
Dwivedi, N. K., Sikdar, A. K., Suryanarayana, N., Susheelamma B. N. and Jolly, M. S (1989). Evaluation of useful mutants in mulberry. Indian Silk, 26(9): 27 - 28.
Eswar Rao, M. S., Dandin, S. B., Mallikarjunappa, R. S., Venkateshaiah, H. V. and Bongale, U. D. (2004). Evaluation of induced tetraploid and evolved triploid mulberry genotypes for propagation, growth and yield parameters. Indian J. Seric, 43(1): 88 - 90.
Farrukh Aqil, Maryam Zahin and Iqbal Ahmad (2008). Antimutagenic activity for methanolic extracts of four ayurvidic medicinal plants. Indian J. Expt. Biol, 46:668 -672.
Gordan, S. A. (1957). The effects of ionizing radiations on plants bio-chemical and physiological aspects. Quast. Rev. Biol, 32: 3 – 14.
Gray A. Sega. (1984). A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methane sulphonate. Mutation/Reviews of Genetic Toxicology, 134(2/3): 113 – 142.
Gunckel, J. E. and Sparrow. A. H. (1954). Aberrant growth in plants induced by ionizing radiation. Brookharem symp. Biol, 6: 252 – 279.
Harber, A. H and Ford, D. E. (1964). Further studies in gamma irradiated wheat and their relevance to use of mitotic inhibition for developmental studies. Amer. J. Bot, 51: 151 – 159. Hardhansau., Pradip Kumar Sahu., Dayakar Yadav, B. R. and Saratchandra, B. (1995). Evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.) genetic resources – 1 sprouting, survival and rooting ability. J. Environ. Res, 3 (1): 11 – 13.
Hartman, H. T. and Kester, D. E. (1976). Plant propagation- Principles and practices. Prentice Hall of India.
Jain, H. K., Rant, R. N. and Khamankar, Y. G. (1968). Base specific chemicals and mutation analysis in Lycopersicon. J. Heredity. 23: 247 -256.
Jayaramaiah, V. C. and Munirajappa. (1987). Induction of mutations in mulberry variety Mysore local by gammairradiation. Sericologia, 27(2): 199 -204.
Karpate, R. R and Choudhary, A. D. (1997). Induced mutation in Linum usitatissimum L. J. Cytol. Genet, 32(1): 41 - 48.
Konzak, C. F., Nilan, R. A., Ligault, R. R. and Foster, R. J. (1961). Modification of induced genetic damage in seeds. In: Proc. Symp. On effects of ionizing radiations on seeds. IAEA. Vienna. pp.155 - 169.
Kuniaki Fukui. (2005). Modeling of mulberry shoot elongation and leaf appearance in field conditions. Plant Production Science, 8(2): 115 – 121.
MiKaelsen, K., Ahnstrom, G. and Li, W.C. (1968). Genetic effects of alkylating agents in barley. Influence of poststorage, metabolic state and pH of mutagen solution. Hereditas, 59: 353 – 374.
Nusrat Saba. and Bushra Mirza. (2002). EMS induced genetic variability in Lycopersicon esculentum. Inter. J. Agri. Biol, 4 (1): 208 – 213.
Nyla Jabeen. and Bushra Mirza. (2004). Ethyl methane sulphonate induces morphological mutations in Capsicum annum L. Inter. J. Agri. Biol, 6 (2): 418 – 421.
Raghuvanshi, S. S., and Singh, A. K. (1974). Studies on the effect of gamma rays on Trigonella foenum-graceum. Cytologia, 39: 473 – 482.
Rahman, N. M. and Soriano, J. D. (1973). Studies on the mutagenic effect of some monofunctional alkylating agents in Rice. Rad. Bot, 12(4): 291 – 295.
Raisinghani, G. and Mahna, S. K. (1994). Mutants of Vigna mungo L. induced by gamma rays and two alkylating agents. J. Cytol. Genet, 29: 137 – 141.
Rao, P., Rao, J. M. M. and Sarojini, N. L. (1984). Mutation breeding in mulberry Morus indica L. Indian J. BA, 7(1): 106 – 111.
Ritcha Mehra Chaudhary. and Suresh Kumar Sinha. (1999). Preliminary characterization of some physiologically important mutants in Brassica juncea L. Cross & Czem. Indian J. Genet, 59 (2): 175 – 191.
Santhoshlal, P. S. and Pavithran, K. (1997). Genetics of EMS induced recessive tall mutation in Rice. Indian J. Genet, 57(2): 210 – 213.
Sastry, C. R., Kumar, R., Dandin, S. B. and Dwivedi, N. K. (1983). Effects of physical and chemical mutagens on sprouting, survival and injury in the varieties of mulberry. Proc. Natl. Semi. Silk Res. Devpt, March, 10 – 13, Bangalore, India. pp. 54.
Singh, V. P., Man Singh. and Pal, J. P. (1999). Mutagenic effects of gamma rays and EMS on frequency and spectrum of chlorophyll and macro mutations in urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Indian J. Genet, 59(2): 203 - 210.
Sonu Goyal., and Samiullah Khan. (2010). Cytology of induced morphological mutants in Vigna mungo L. Hepper. Egyptian J. Biol, 12: 81- 85.
Waghmare, V. N. and Mehra, R. B. (2000). Induced genetic variability for quantitative characters in Grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Indian J. Genet, 60(1): 81 - 87.
Bhat, S. R., Haque, A. and Chopra, V. L. (2001). Induction of mutants for cytoplasmic male sterility and some rare phenotypes in Indian mustard (Brassica Juncea L.). Indian J. Genet, 61(4): 335 – 340.
Blonstein, A. D. and Gale, M. D. (1984). Cell size and cell number in dwarf mutants of barley in semi dwarf cereal mutants and their use in cross breeding II (Teidsc 407), TFAO/IAEA, Vienna: 19 – 29.
Broertjes, C. and Van Harten, A. M. (1998). Development in crop science 12. Applied mutation breeding for vegetatively propagated crops. Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc, New York, USA. pp: 80 – 84.
Chandramouli. (1970). Mutagen induced dichotomous branching in Maize. J. Heredity. 61:150.
Dandin, S. B. and Jolly, M. S. (1986). Mulberry descriptor. Sericologia, 26(4): 465 – 475.
Dandin, S. B. and Kumar, R. (1989). Evaluation of mulberry genotypes for different growth and yield parameters. In: Genetic resources of mulberry and utilization. Edt. By Sengupta and Dandin, S. B., C.S.R. and T.I., Mysore. pp.142 - 152.
Deshpande, K. N., Mehetre S. S., and Pingle, S. D. (2010). Effect of different mutagens for induction of mutation in Mulberry. Asian J.Exp. Sci. Spl, 104 -108.
Dwivedi, N. K., Sikdar, A. K., Suryanarayana, N., Susheelamma B. N. and Jolly, M. S (1989). Evaluation of useful mutants in mulberry. Indian Silk, 26(9): 27 - 28.
Eswar Rao, M. S., Dandin, S. B., Mallikarjunappa, R. S., Venkateshaiah, H. V. and Bongale, U. D. (2004). Evaluation of induced tetraploid and evolved triploid mulberry genotypes for propagation, growth and yield parameters. Indian J. Seric, 43(1): 88 - 90.
Farrukh Aqil, Maryam Zahin and Iqbal Ahmad (2008). Antimutagenic activity for methanolic extracts of four ayurvidic medicinal plants. Indian J. Expt. Biol, 46:668 -672.
Gordan, S. A. (1957). The effects of ionizing radiations on plants bio-chemical and physiological aspects. Quast. Rev. Biol, 32: 3 – 14.
Gray A. Sega. (1984). A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methane sulphonate. Mutation/Reviews of Genetic Toxicology, 134(2/3): 113 – 142.
Gunckel, J. E. and Sparrow. A. H. (1954). Aberrant growth in plants induced by ionizing radiation. Brookharem symp. Biol, 6: 252 – 279.
Harber, A. H and Ford, D. E. (1964). Further studies in gamma irradiated wheat and their relevance to use of mitotic inhibition for developmental studies. Amer. J. Bot, 51: 151 – 159. Hardhansau., Pradip Kumar Sahu., Dayakar Yadav, B. R. and Saratchandra, B. (1995). Evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.) genetic resources – 1 sprouting, survival and rooting ability. J. Environ. Res, 3 (1): 11 – 13.
Hartman, H. T. and Kester, D. E. (1976). Plant propagation- Principles and practices. Prentice Hall of India.
Jain, H. K., Rant, R. N. and Khamankar, Y. G. (1968). Base specific chemicals and mutation analysis in Lycopersicon. J. Heredity. 23: 247 -256.
Jayaramaiah, V. C. and Munirajappa. (1987). Induction of mutations in mulberry variety Mysore local by gammairradiation. Sericologia, 27(2): 199 -204.
Karpate, R. R and Choudhary, A. D. (1997). Induced mutation in Linum usitatissimum L. J. Cytol. Genet, 32(1): 41 - 48.
Konzak, C. F., Nilan, R. A., Ligault, R. R. and Foster, R. J. (1961). Modification of induced genetic damage in seeds. In: Proc. Symp. On effects of ionizing radiations on seeds. IAEA. Vienna. pp.155 - 169.
Kuniaki Fukui. (2005). Modeling of mulberry shoot elongation and leaf appearance in field conditions. Plant Production Science, 8(2): 115 – 121.
MiKaelsen, K., Ahnstrom, G. and Li, W.C. (1968). Genetic effects of alkylating agents in barley. Influence of poststorage, metabolic state and pH of mutagen solution. Hereditas, 59: 353 – 374.
Nusrat Saba. and Bushra Mirza. (2002). EMS induced genetic variability in Lycopersicon esculentum. Inter. J. Agri. Biol, 4 (1): 208 – 213.
Nyla Jabeen. and Bushra Mirza. (2004). Ethyl methane sulphonate induces morphological mutations in Capsicum annum L. Inter. J. Agri. Biol, 6 (2): 418 – 421.
Raghuvanshi, S. S., and Singh, A. K. (1974). Studies on the effect of gamma rays on Trigonella foenum-graceum. Cytologia, 39: 473 – 482.
Rahman, N. M. and Soriano, J. D. (1973). Studies on the mutagenic effect of some monofunctional alkylating agents in Rice. Rad. Bot, 12(4): 291 – 295.
Raisinghani, G. and Mahna, S. K. (1994). Mutants of Vigna mungo L. induced by gamma rays and two alkylating agents. J. Cytol. Genet, 29: 137 – 141.
Rao, P., Rao, J. M. M. and Sarojini, N. L. (1984). Mutation breeding in mulberry Morus indica L. Indian J. BA, 7(1): 106 – 111.
Ritcha Mehra Chaudhary. and Suresh Kumar Sinha. (1999). Preliminary characterization of some physiologically important mutants in Brassica juncea L. Cross & Czem. Indian J. Genet, 59 (2): 175 – 191.
Santhoshlal, P. S. and Pavithran, K. (1997). Genetics of EMS induced recessive tall mutation in Rice. Indian J. Genet, 57(2): 210 – 213.
Sastry, C. R., Kumar, R., Dandin, S. B. and Dwivedi, N. K. (1983). Effects of physical and chemical mutagens on sprouting, survival and injury in the varieties of mulberry. Proc. Natl. Semi. Silk Res. Devpt, March, 10 – 13, Bangalore, India. pp. 54.
Singh, V. P., Man Singh. and Pal, J. P. (1999). Mutagenic effects of gamma rays and EMS on frequency and spectrum of chlorophyll and macro mutations in urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Indian J. Genet, 59(2): 203 - 210.
Sonu Goyal., and Samiullah Khan. (2010). Cytology of induced morphological mutants in Vigna mungo L. Hepper. Egyptian J. Biol, 12: 81- 85.
Waghmare, V. N. and Mehra, R. B. (2000). Induced genetic variability for quantitative characters in Grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Indian J. Genet, 60(1): 81 - 87.
Issue
Section
Research Articles
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
How to Cite
Ethyl Methane Sulphonate induced morphological variations in mulberry (Morus) variety M5. (2011). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 3(1), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v3i1.167
