##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Arvind Kumar A. P. Karunakar Anil Nath Bolta Ram Meena

Abstract

The field experiment conducted with different plant density and different Genotypes showed significant differences in their morphological characters and phenological characters. Among the genotypes, AKA-7 possessed higher plant height (116.4 cm), No. of sympodia (19.27 plant-1) and leaf area index (3.628) compared to other geno-types but leaf area (33.02 dm-2) and dry matter weight (103.21g/plant) were recorded higher with genotype Balwan. However, Normal plant density (100%) was registered higher plant height (102.6 cm), no of sympodia (17.33 plant-1), leaf area (27.02 dm2) and dry matter weight (58.13 g/plant) but higher leaf area index (3.430) was recorded with higher plant density (200%). Among the genotypes, AKH-081 was comparatively earlier in phenological characters i.e. first square (47.9 days), first flower (67.9 days), first boll burst (116.1 days), first picking (128.7 days) and final picking (178 days). However, Higher planting density (200%) was recorded earlier in first square (49.3 day), first flower (67.8 days), first boll burst (116.9 days), first picking (130.6 day) and final picking (179.7 days). On the basis of this experiment, genotype Balwan and normal planting density level (100%) recorded higher morphological development wherever phenological development recorded earlier with the each respective phenophase in the Gen-otype AKH-081 and highest planting density level (200%).

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Genotypes, Plant density, Plant morphology, Plant phenology

References
Ban, Yogesh G., D.P. Nawalkar, B.M. Mote, V. Kumar, A.V. Narwade, (2015). Crop phenology, thermal requirement, yield and fiber properties of cotton (Gossypiumhirsutum) genotypes as influenced by different environments, Ind. J. Plant Physiol., 20(2):137–144.
Bange, M. P., and S. P. Milroy. (2004) "Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes." Field Crops Research. 87(1): 73-87.
Bednarz C. W., D.C. Bridges and S.M. Brown, (2000). Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities. Agronomy Journal, 92:128-135.
Bharathi, S. G., M. V. Prasad Rao, S. RatnaKumari and V. Chenga Reddy, (2012). Influence of plant geometry and nitrogen levels on performance of cotton hybrids under rainfed condition in vertisols of Andhra Pradesh. J. Cotton Res. Dev. 26 (2): 204-206.
Copur, O., (2006). Determination of yield and yield components of some cotton cultivars in semi arid conditions. Pak. J Biol. Sci., 9(14): 2572-2578.
Darawsheh M.K., Aivalakis G. and Bouranis D.L., (2007). Effect of cultivation system on cotton development, seed cotton production and lint quality. The European J. Plant Sci. and Biotechnology 1(2)-206-213.
Zhang Dongsheng, Lizhen Zhang, Jianguo Liu, Shuo Han, Qi Wang, Jochem Evers, Jun Liu, Wopke van der Werf, Long Li, (2014). Plant density affects light interception and yield in cotton grown as companion crop in young jujube plantations. Field Crops Research 169:132-139.
Giri, A. N, R.L. Aundhekar, P.S. Kapse and S. B. Suryavanshi, (2008). Response of Bt cotton hybrids to plant densities and fertilizer levels. J. Cotton Res. Dev. 22 (1): 45-47,
Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez, (1984). Statistical procedure for Agricultural Research. An International Rice Research institute Book. A Wiley Inter Science Publication, New York.
Jadhav, S. G., B.A. Chavan and Y.M. Waghmare, (2015). Effect of plant spacing growth regulator and nutrient management on yield, quality and economics of Bt cotton. J. Cotton Res. Dev. 29 (1) :48-52.
Jagtap, D. N. and V. M. Bhale, (2011). Effect of different plant spacing and nitrogen levels on deshi cotton hybrid (Gossypiumarboreum L.). J. Agric. Sci.7: 123-125.
Moola, R. and A.N. Giri, (2006). Response of newly released cotton (G. hirsutum) varieties to plant densities and fertilizer levels. J. Cotton Res. Dev. 20(1):85-86.
Munir, M. K., M. Tahir, M. F. Saleem and M.Yaseen, (2015). Growth, yield and earliness response of cotton to row spacing and nitrogen management. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 25(3): 729-738.
Mygdakos, E., C. Avgoulas, K. Adamidis and G.Ekonomou, (2004). Cotton cultivation on narrow rows as an alternative culture method: Production and economics. J. Food, Agric. & Environ. 2 :198-201.
Paslawar, A. N., A. S. Deotalu and P. W. Nemade, 2015. High density planting of cotton variety AKH – 081 under rainfed condition of Vidharbha, Plant archives, 15( 2):1075-1077.
Patil, Basanagouda C., and S. S. Patil.(2007) "Performance of compact cotton genotypes (G. hirsutum) at three spacings and two moisture levels." World Cotton Research Conference-4, Lubbock, Texas, USA, 10-14 September 2007. International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC), 2007.
Pradeep Kumar, A.S. Karle, Deshraj Singh and Lalita Verma. (2017). Effect of High Density Planting System (HDPS) and Varieties on Yield, Economics and Quality of Desi Cotton. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(3): 233-238.
Rose, Roche, Michael Bange, Stephen Milroy and Graeme Hammer, (2003). Cotton growth in UNR systems. The Australian Cotton Grower, October-November 2003.
Saleem, M. F., et al. (2010) "Effect of different phosphorus levels on earliness and yield of cotton cultivars." Soil & Environment. 29: 128-135.
Sankarnaryanan, K.P, raharaj C.S, Nalayani P., Bandyopodhy K.K and 80 Gopalakrishnan .N.(2010) Climate change and its effect on cotton (Gossipium sp.) Indian journal agriculture sciences, 80:561-575.
Shekar, K., M. Venkata Ramana, S.M. RatnaKumari, (2015). Response of hybrid cotton to chloromepiquat chloride and detopping under high density planting, Cotton Res. J. Dev. 29 (1) 84-86.
Silvertooth, J.C. (1999). Row Spacing, plant population, and yield relationships. Arizona cotton comments. Coop. Ext., Univ. Arizona, Tucson, USA. Online available at http://cals.arizona. edu/crops/cotton/comments/ Capril 1999cc.html.
Singh, Deepika B., Ramandeep Kaur M. Malhi and G. Sandhya Kiran, (2015). Assessing the impact of agronomic spacing conditions on biophysical and biochemical parameters along with yield and yield components in cotton, International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research . 6 (1): 6-44.
Sisodia, R.I. and S.K. Khamparia, 2007. American cotton varieties as influenced by plant densities and fertility levels under rainfed conditions. J. Cotton Res. Dev. 21(1):35-40.
Venugopalan, M.V., K.R. Kranthi, D. Blaise, Shubhangi Lakde, and K. Shankaranarayanan, (2013). High density planting system in cotton-the Brazil experience and Indian initiatives. Cotton Res. J. 5(2) 172-185.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

The morphological and phenological performance of different cotton genotypes under different plant density. (2017). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9(4), 2242-2248. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i4.1518