Efficacy of traditional products on the biochemical aspects of stored mungbean infested with Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The effect of traditional products viz. turmeric powder, turmeric grits, garlic powder along with standard check (7 cm layer of sand on the top of stored seed) was evaluated on the biochemical aspects of stored mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.)] infested with Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius). Treatments with garlic powder at 1.5 % concentration recorded significantly less egg laying (2.00), less larval penetration (5.00%), less adult emergence (1.02%) as compared to other treatments. Alcoholic acidity increased significantly from 0.51 to 0.59, 0.46 to 0.55 and 0.38 to 0.49 % by turmeric powder at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 % concentration, respectively, as compared to control samples. Garlic powder was found to be most effective in checking uric acid at concentration of 1.5 % during four months of storage, followed by turmeric powder @ 2.0 % and turmeric grits @ 1.0 %. Order of effectiveness of used traditional products was garlic powder> turmeric powder>turmeric grits.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Alcoholic acidity, C. maculatus, Mungbean, Storage, Traditional products
AOAC.(1960). Official Methods of Analysis. Pp. 162-64. Association of Agricultural Chemists, Washington.
Aslam, M., Zia, A. and Shaheen, F. A.(2004). Efficacy of some plant materials against stored chickpea beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis Linnaeus. Pak J Arid Agric., 7: 215-217.
Bhardwaj, A. and Verma, S. C. (2012). Evaluation of vegetable oils against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infesting pea seeds (Pisum sativum l.). Pest Mgmt Hort Ecosystems 18: 46-53.
Cheema, H. S. and Singh, B. C. (1990). A User’s manual to CPCS 1, Pp. 46 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
Kar, A., Ganguli, J. and Ganguli, R. N.(2012). Testing of few botanicals as leaf powder against oviposition of pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera : Bruchidae) on chickpea kabuli variety dollar. J Ent Res 36: 334-338.
Mehrotra, K. N.(1991). Current status of pesticide resistance in insect-pests in India. J Insect Sci., 4: 1-14.
Pajni, H.R. (1987). Ecological status of host range and polymorphism in bruchidae. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, Tel Aviv, Israel, 21-26 September 1986 (edited by Dorahye E and Navarro S) Bet Dagan, Israel. Agri Res Org., 506-16.
Rahman, A. and Talukder, F. A. (2006) Bioefficacy of some plant derivatives that protect grain against pulse beetle C. maculatus. J Insect Sci., 6:1-10.
Ramazan, M., Chahal, B. S. and Judge, B. K. (1990). Storage losses to some commonly used pulses caused by pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. J Insect Sci., 3: 106-08.
Sharma, R., Devi, R., Sharma, R. K. and Mehla, J. C. (2013) Efficacy of some botanicals against pulse beetle, C. chinensis (L.) in chickpea. Legume Res 36: 125-30.
Singh, D. P. and Sharma, S. S.(1981). Studies on weight loss in different varieties of moong and mash during storage caused by Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Bull Grain Technol., 19: 194-97.
Singh, D. P. and Sharma, S. S. (1982). Studies on the grain damage and germination loss caused by C. maculatus (Fab.) in different varieties of moong and mash during storage. Bull. Grain Technol., 20: 20-24.
Thaper, V. K., Paul, B. and Singh, R. (1973). A calorimetric method for assaying uricase activity in plant material. Indian J Agric Sci 43: 536-38.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
