Light interception and yield response of cotton varieties to high density planting and fertilizers in sub-tropical India

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published Sep 1, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i3.1448

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

M. Y. Ajayakumar
All India Coordinated Research Project on Cotton, Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584104 (Karnataka), INDIA
M. R. Umesh
All India Coordinated Research Project on Cotton, Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584104 (Karnataka), INDIA
Shivaleela Shivaleela
All India Coordinated Research Project on Cotton, Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584104 (Karnataka), INDIA
J.M. Nidagundi
All India Coordinated Research Project on Cotton, Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584104 (Karnataka), INDIA

Abstract

Plant density and optimum fertilization are two important agronomic practices to enhance productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of high density planting (HDPS) and fertilization rate, especially their interactions, on yield, yield components of cotton varieties in sub-tropical India. Split-split plot design was adopted and replicated thrice. The main plots were assigned to low, medium and high plant densities (16.7, 13.3 and 11.1 plants/m2). Pre released cotton varieties TCH-1705 and LH-2298 were tested in low, moderate and high rates of fertilizers recommended for the region (100, 125 and 150 %) in sub-sub plots. Significantly higher seed cotton yield (1148 kg/ha) was achieved in narrow inter row spaced at 60 cm over normal plant row spacing of 90 cm (1025 kg/ha). Compact genotype TCH-1705 was out yielded (1146 kg/ha) over LH 2298(1044 kg/ha). Application of fertilizers at higher rate improved seed cotton yield (1232 kg/ha) Leaf area index (3.8) and light interception (0.98) over blanket recommendation. The results of the study inferred that seed cotton yield improvement was possible under HDPS production system with compact varieties grown at narrow spacing and higher fertilizer dose.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Cotton, Leaf area index, Light interception, Plant density

References
AICCIP (2014) .All India Coordinate Cotton Improvement Project –Annual report 2013-14. Pub: Project Coordina-tor, Central Institute on Cotton Research, Regional Sta-tion, Coimbatore. Annual Report 2013-14
Andrade FH, Calvino P, Cirilo A, Barbieri P (2002) Yield responses to narrow rows depends on increased radia-tion interception. Agronomy Journal, 94: 975-980
Brodrick, R., MP.Bange, SP Milroy and GL Hammer, (2010).Yield and maturity of ultra-narrow rowcotton in high input production systems. Agronomy Journal. 102(3): 843-848
Heitholt, JJ, Meredith, WR, Jr. and Williford, JR, (1996). Comparison of cotton genotypes varying in canopychar-acteristics in 76-cm and 102-cm rows. Crop Science. 36: 955-960
Maddonni GA, Otegui ME, Cirilo AG., (2001).Plant popula-tion density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize
M.Y. Ajayakumar et al. / J. Appl. & Nat. Sci. 9 (3): 1835 -1839 (2017) 1838 canopy architecture and light attenuation.Field Crop Research, 71: 183-193
Monteith, JL., (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281:277–294
Munir, M. K., Tahir, M., Saleem M. F. and Yaseen, M. (2015). Growth, yield and earliness response of cotton to row spacing and Nitrogen management. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 25(3): 729-738
Paslawar, AN, Deotalu, AS and PW Nemade (2015). High density planting of cotton variety AKH – 081 under rainfed condition of Vidharbha. Plant Archives.15 (2): 1075-1077
Rinehardt, JM, KL Edmisten, R. Wells, and JC, Faircloth (2003). Response of ultra narrow and conventional spaced cotton to variable nitrogen rates. Journal of Plant Nutrition.27 : 741- 753
Rossi,J., Eva Braojos, and Baxevanos, D. (2007). Varietal M.Y. Ajayakumar et al. / J. Appl. & Nat. Sci. 9 (3): 1835 -1839 (2017)
Response to Ultra Narrow Row Cotton in Spain. World Cot-ton Research Conference 4. Sept 10-14, 2007, Lubbock, Texas. http://wcrc.confex.com /wcrc/2007/techprogram/P1772
Singh JV, Shilpa Babar, Shalu Abraham, MV. Venugopalan, and G. Majumdar. (2012). Fertilization of High Density, Rainfed Cotton Grown on Vertisols of India. Better Crops with Plant Food. 96(2): 26-28
Sharratt, BS, McWilliams DA, (2005). Microclimatic and rooting characteristics of narrow-row versus conven-tional-row corn. Agronomy Journal. 97: 1129-1135
Silva PT, Macedo, FG, Camacho, MA, Santos, C, Santi, A, Krause, W. and Rambo. J. R. (2012). Spacing and plant density effect on reproductive development of herba-ceous cotton - Scientia Plena8, 5 : 1-9
Venugopalan, MV, Kranthi, KV, Blaise, K., Shubhangi Lak-de and Sankaranarayana, K., (2013). High density plant-ing system in cotton -The Brazil experience and Indian initiatives. Cotton Research Journal,5 (2): 1-6
Issue
Vol 9 No 3 (2017)
Section
Research Articles

This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)

How to Cite

Light interception and yield response of cotton varieties to high density planting and fertilizers in sub-tropical India. (2017). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9(3), 1835-1839. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i3.1448