Evaluation of periphyton quantity on different natural substrates in Earthen lined pond
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Experiments were conducted in outdoor earthen lined pond to study periphyton quantity on three types of natural substrates such as split bamboo pole, coconut coir and coconut shell, which was placed inside the earthen lined pond filled with seawater for duration of 45 days. Observations were made in every 15th day for growth of periphyton both qualitatively and quantitatively on the three natural substrates and physico-chemical properties of selected pond water such as transparency, water temperature, salinity, pH, Dissolved oxygen, Ammonia (NH3-N), Nitrite (NO2-N), Nitrate (NO3-N), BOD and Chlorophyll ‘a’ were recorded during periphyton samplings. The periphy-ton quantity (34562 ± 671 cells / cm2) observed for coconut coir was higher than the split bamboo pole (33104 ± 810 cells / cm2), and coconut shell (21194 ± 872 cells / cm2) in the final day of the experiment. One way ANOVA of the data collected clearly affirmed that significant differences were observed (P < 0.05) in periphyton quantity among the three substrates tested. A total 16 phyto-periphytic microalgae (Bacillariophyceae – 10 types, Dinophyceae – 4 types and Cyanophyceae – 2 types) and 10 Zoo-periphyton (Copepod- 4 types, Meroplankton – 4 types and Tintin-nidae – 2 types) were recorded from these three substrates. Among the different phyto-periphytic microalgae, Bacil-lariophyceae group were found to be more (Split bamboo pole – 72%, Coconut coir – 73% and Coconut shell – 71%) on three substrates studied. Further, coconut coir was found to be best substrate than split bamboo pole and coconut shell, which can be utilized by fin and shellfishes as natural food.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Earthern lined pond, Natural food, Natural substrates, Periphyton quantity and quality
APHA (1995). Standard Methods for the Examination of the Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington.
Arnold, S. J., Sellars, M. J., Crocos, P. J. and Coman, G. J. (2006). Intensive production of juvenile tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon: An evaluation of stocking density and artificial substrates. Aquaculture, 261: 890-896.
Avnimelech, Y., Verdegem, M.C.J., Kurup, M. and Keshavanath, P. (2008). Sustainable land-based aquaculture: rational utilization of water, land and feed resources. Medit. Aquacult. J., 1:45-55.
Azim, M. E., Verdegem, M. C. J., Mantingh, I., van Dam, A. A. and Beveridge, M. C. M. (2003). Ingestion and utilization of periphyton grown on artificial substrates by Nill tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. L. Aquac. Res., 34: 85-92.
Azim, M. E., Wahab, M A., Van Dam, A. A., Beveridge, M. C. M. and Verdegem, M. C. J. (2001). The potential of periphyton-based culture of two Indian major carps, rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and gonia Labeo gonius (Linnaeus). Aquacult. Res., 32: 209-216.
Azim, M. E., Wahab, M. A., Biswas, P. K., Asaeda, T., Fujino,T. and Verdegem, M.C.J. (2004). The effect of periphyton substrate density on production in freshwater polyculture ponds. Aquaculture, 232: 441- 453.
Azim, M. E., Wahab, M. A., Verdegem, M. C. J., van Dam, A. A., van Rooij, J. M., Malcolm, M. E. and Beveridge, C. M. (2002). The effects of artificial substrates on freshwater pond productivity and water quality and the implications for periphyton-based aquaculture. Aquat. Living Resour., 15: 231–241.
Ballester, E. L. C., Waisielesky, W. J., Cavalli, R. O. and Abreu, P. C. (2007). Nursery of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis in cages with artificial substrates: Biofilm composition and shrimp performance. Aquaculture, 269: 355-362.
Belcher, H. and Swale, S. (1976). A Beginner’s Guide to Freshwater Algae. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology. Natural Environmental Research Council, London.
Belinger, E.G. (1992). A Key to Common Algae. The Institute of Water and Environmental Management, London, UK.
Boyd, C. E. (1990). Water Quality in Ponds for Aquaculture. Birmingham Publishing Company, Birmingham, Alabama. 482p.
Burford, M. A., Sellars, M. J., Arnold, S. J., Keys, S. J., Crocos, P. J. and Preston, N. P. (2004). Contribution of the natural biota associated with substrates to the nutritional requirements of the post-larval shrimp, Penaeus esculentus (Haswell), in high-density rearing systems. Aquac. Res., 35: 508-515.
Dharmaraj, M., Manissery, J. K. and Keshavanath, P. (2002). Effects of biodegradable substrate, sugercase bagasse and supplemental feed on growth and production of fringed – liped peninsula carp, Labeo fimbriatus (Bloch), Acta Ichthyologica et piscatorial, 32:137-144.
Dutta, M. P., Phukan, B., Baishya, S., Hussain, I. A., Kashyap, D., Deka, P. and Roy, S. (2013). Comparative study of periphyton growth on two different substrates (palm leaf and nylon net). Environment and Ecology, 31(4): 1725-1731.
Keshavanath, P., Gangadhar, B., Ramesh, T. J., van Dam, A. A., Beveridge, M. C.M. and Verdegem, M. C. J. (2004). Effects of bamboo substrate and supplemental feeding on growth and production of hybrid red tilapia fingerlings (Oreochromis mossambicus x Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 235: 303–314.
Keshavanath, P., Gangadhar, B., Ramesh, T. J., Van Rooij, J. M. Beveridge, M. C. M., Baird, D. J., Verdegem, M. C. J. and Van Dam, A. A. (2001). Use of articicial substrates to enhance production of freshwater herbivorous fish in pond culture. Aquacult. Res. 32: 189-197.
Keshavanath, P., Gangadhar, p., Ramesh, T. J., van Dam, A. A., Beveridge, M.C. M. and Verdegem, M. C. J. (2002). The effects of periphyton and feeding on the production of the indigenous carps Tor khudree and Labeo fimbriatus in tanks with different bamboo substrate densities. Aquaculture, 213:207–218.
Keshavanath, P., Manissery, J. K., Ganapathibha, A. and Gangadhar, B. (2012). Evaluation of Four Biodegradable Substrates for Periphyton and Fish Production Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 24: 60–68.
Makarevich, P. R., Larionov, V. V. and Druzhkov, N. V. (1993). Mean weights of dominant phytoplankton species of the Barents sea, Algology, 3(1): 103-106.
Mridula, R, Manissery, J. K., Keshavanath, P., Shankar, K. M., Nandeesha, M. C. and Rajash, K.M. (2003). Water quality, biofilm production and growth of fringed – lipped carp (Labeo fimbriatus) in tanks provided with two solid substrates, Bioresource Technology, 87(3): 263-267.
Prescott, G.W. (1962). Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area. Wm. C. Brown Co., Inc., Dubuque, lowa, 977 pp.
Preto, A. L., Cavalli, R., Pissetti, T. Abreu, P. C. and Wasielesky, W. J. (2005). Effect of stocking density on the biofilm and the performance of post-larvae Farfantepenaeus paulensis cultured in cages. Cienc Rural, 35: 1417-1423 (in Portuguese).
Ramesh, M. R., Shankar, K.M., Mohan, C.V. and Varghese, T. J. (1999). Comparison of three plant substrates for enhancing carp growth through bacterial biofilm. Aquac. Eng. 19: 119–131.
Saikia, S. K. and Das, D. N. (2011). Diversity and productivity (Chlorophyll-a and Biomass) of periphyton on natural and artificial substrates from wetland ecosystem. Journal of Wetlands Ecology, 5: 1-9.
Saikia, S.K., Majumder, S., Nandi, S. and Saha, S.K. (2013). Feeding ecology of the freshwater fish rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton 1822): a case of intelligent feeding in the periphyton-based environment. Zoology and Ecology, 23: 266–274.
Umesh, N. R., Shankar, K. M. and Mohan, C. V. (1999). Enhancing growth of common carp, rohu and Mozambique tilapia through plant substrate: the role of bacterial biofilm. Aquac. Int., 7: 251-260.
Zarain-Herzberg, M., Campa-Córdova, A.I. and Cavalli, R. O. (2006). Biological viability of producingwhite shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in seawaterfloating cages. Aquaculture, 259: 283-289.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
