Article Main

K. R. Swamy D. Shivaprasad Shivaputra Bammanahalli Noorandappa Lamani H. Shivanna

Abstract

Carbon sequestration has been suggested as a means to mitigate the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. As agrisilviculture systems is one of the better options for stocking of carbon in plants and in soil. In the present study, carbon sequestration was quantified both biomass as well as in soil of agrisilviculture sys-tem six different tree species were selected such as, Pongamia pinnata, Dalbergia sissoo, Acacia auriculiformis, Tectona grandis, Casuarina equisitifolia, Azadirachta indica in shelterbelt of agroforestry system in arid region of Karnataka. Among six different tree species planted under shelterbelt, the growth performance with respect to gbh, height, clear bole height and basal area was highest in A. auriculiformis and A. indica. While maximum above ground biomass was observed in A. auriculiformis (59.75 t ha-1) followed by T.grandis (56.62 t ha-1), respectively. Whereas, below ground biomass was highest in T. grandis (20.25t ha-1) followed by A. auriculiformis (14.75t ha-1). Above ground carbon sequestration was highest in A. auriculiformis (13.30 t ha-1) followed by T. grandis (12.20 t ha-1), respectively. Whereas, below ground carbon sequestration was more in T. grandis (4.35 t ha-1) followed by A. auriculiformis (3.95 t ha-1). The Shelterbelt system sequestered 0.43 to 1.34% soil organic carbon stock in different depth. The carbon sequestered in different tree species was varying from 3.48 tons to 17.25 t ha-1.Growing tree crops in shelterbelts, bunds in the agroforestry systems will enhance accumulation of carbon stocking and provide additional benefits to the farmer’s income. It also regulates microclimate and increases the tree cover in agricultural field.

Article Details

Article Details

Keywords

Agroforestry system, Biomass, Carbon sequestration, Shelter belt, Soil organic carbon

References
Anju, S.V. and Koppad. A.G. (2013). Influence of in situ soil moisture conservation measures on growth and productivity of Acacia auriculiformis. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 26(1): 170-171
Banerjee, S.K. and Prakasam. U. (2013). Biomass carbon pool and soil organic carbon sequestration in Tectona grandis plantations. Indian For.,139(9): 797-802
Bhattacharyya, T., Pal, D.K., Chandran, P., Ray, S.K., Mandal C. and Telpande. B. (2008). Soil carbon storage capacity as a tool to prioritize areas for carbon sequestration. Curr.Sci.,95(4): 482-494
Chandran, P., Ray, S.K., Durge, S.L., Raja, P. Nimkar, A.M. Bhattacharyya T. and Pal. D.K. (2009). Scope of horticultural land-use system in enhancing carbon sequestration in ferruginous soils of the semi-arid tropics. Curr. Sci.,97(7): 1039-1046
Devaranavadgi, S.B. and Murthy. B.G. (1999). Performance of different tree species on eroded soils of northern dry zone of Karnataka. Ind. J. of For., 122: 166-168
Ennik and Hofman, B. (1983). Variation in root mass of ryegrass types and its ecological consequences. Neth, J. agric. Sci., 31: 325-334
Huck, M.G. (1983). Root distribution, growth and activity with reference to Agroforestry. In:plant research and Agroforestry. (Huxley P.A. Ed.) ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya.
IPCC (2000) Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Jayaraman, K. and Rajan. A.R. (1991). Yield from Acacia auriculiformis Plantations in Kerala. KFRI Research Report, 81: .21-25
Koul, D.N. and Panwar. P. (2008). Prioritizing land-management options for carbon sequestration potential. Curr. Sci.,95 (5): 658-663
Kumar, G.P., Murkute, A.A., Gupta S. and Singh. S.B. (2009). Carbon sequestration with special reference to agroforestry in cold deserts of Ladak. Curr. Sci., 97: 1063-1068
Lavania, U.C. and Lavania. S. (2009). Sequestration of atmospheric carbon into subsoil horizons through deep-rooted grasses-vetiver grass model. Curr. Sci.,97(5): 618-619
Mehta, L.C., Singh, J., Chauhan, P.S., Singh B. and Manhas. R.K. (2016). Biomass accumulation and carbon storage in six-year-old Citrus reticulata blanco. plantation. Indian For.,142 (6): 563-568
Miria, A. and Khan. A.B. (2015). Growth and carbon storage study in some multipurpose tree species of Pondicherry area. Indian For., 141 (6): 625-629
Miria, A. and Khan. A.B. (2012). Biomass estimation and carbon storage in selected multipurpose trees and common wild grasses. Indian For.,138(9): 853-856
Murthy, I.K., Gupta, M., Tomar, S., Munsi, M., Tiwari, R., Hegde, G.T. and Ravindranath, N.H. (2013). Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry system in India. J.Earth Sci. Climate Change, 4(1): 1-7
Nair, P.K.R., Nair, V.D., Kumar,B.M. and Showalter. J.M. (2010). Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron., 108: 237-307.
Nath, A.J. and Das. A.K. (2011). Carbon storage and sequestration in bamboo-based smallholder homegardens of Barak Valley, Assam. Curr. Sci.,100: 229-233
Pandey, D.N. (1998). Ethnoforestry: Local knowledge for sustainable forestry and livelihood security. New Delhi, India.
Planning Commission, Government of India (2001). Report of the Task Force of Greening India for Livelihood Security and Sustainable Development.
Ponnuswamy, P.K. (1982). Introduction of pines in Tamil Nadu. Indian For.,108: 123-130.
Rai, P., Solanki,K.R. and Singh. U.P. (2000). Growth and biomass production of multipurpose trees species in natural grassland under semi-arid conditions. Indian J. Agrofor., 2: 101-103.
Ramachandran, A., Jayakumar, S., Mohamed Haroon A.R. and Bhaskaran. A. (2007). Carbon management in forest floor- an agenda of 21st century in Indian Forestry scenario. Indian For., 133(1): 25-40.
Rao, L.G. G., Joseph B. and Sreemannarayana. B. (2000). Growth and biomass production of some important multipurpose tree species of rainfed sandy loam soils. Indian For., 126(7): 772-781
Rawat, V., Singh, D. and Kumar, P. (2003). Climate change and its impact on forest biodiversity. Indian For.,129: 787-798
Sahni K.C. (1998). The book of Indian trees, Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai.
Chauhan, S.K., Gupta, N., Ritu, Yadav, S. and Chauhan, R. (2009). Biomass and Carbon allocation in different parts of Agroforestry tree species. Indian For.,135(7): 981-993
Sharma, J. (2012). Carbon stocks and flux for forest in Karnataka, India. MyForest, 48(1): 45-63
Singh, B. and Singh. G. (2015). Biomass production and carbon stock in a silvi¬horti based agroforestry system in arid region of Rajasthan. Indian For.,141(12): 1237-1243
Swamy, K.R., Shivaprasad, D., Bammanahalli, S. Lamani N.T. and Shivanna. H. (2015). Assessment of carbon sequestration of different tree species planted under shelterbelt of Northern Transitional Zone of Karnataka. Res. Environ. Life Sci.,8(4): 657-658
Swamy, K.R., Vijayakumar, P.K., Sankri, G., Hubballi, S. and Devakumar, A.S.(2013), Estimation of biomass and carbon stock in different age gradations of Silver oak in coffee based agroforestry system. MyForest, 49: 57-60
Swamy, S.L., Puri S. and Mishra. A. (2003). Biomass production and root distribution of Gmelina arboria under an agrisilviculture systemin sub-humid tropics of central India. New forest, 26: 167-186
Vashum, K.T., Kasomwoshi, T., Jayakumar. S. (2016). Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of primary and secondary forests in Northeast India. PIAEES, 6(3) 67-74
Verma, S.C., Jain, R.K,. Rao, M.V., Mishra P.N. and Ramurthy. (1982). Influence of canopy on soil composition of manmade forest in alkali soil of Banthra. Indian For.,112(6): 431-437
Walkley and Black. (1965). An examination of methods for determining soil organic matters and proposed modifications of the cromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37:29-38
Yadava, A.K. (2010). Biomass production and carbon sequestration in different agroforestry system in terrain region of central Himalaya. Indian For.,136 (2): 234-244
Yashmita¬ulman and Avudainayagam. S. (2012), Organic carbon storage by Ailanthus excelsa plantations. Indian For.,138 (11): 1041-1046.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Carbon storage potential of shelter belt agroforestry system in northern transitional zone of Karnataka, India. (2017). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9(3), 1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i3.1373