Validation of integrated pest management module against insect pests of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan in Tarai region of Uttarakhand
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Experiments on validation of integrated pest management (IPM) module against insect pest of pigeonpea in comparison with the Non-IPM (farmer’s practices) were conducted at N.E.B. Crop Research Centre, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar during Kharif 2014 and 2015. Adopted IPM module contained Seed treatment with Trichoderma spp. @10g/kg of seed, Sole crop, Bird perches @ 50/ha, need based insecticides spray (Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC @ 30 g a. i./ha; Neem soap@10g/lit; Acetamiprid 20SP @ 20 g a. i./ha). The results indicated that minimum population of pod borers (Helicoverpa armigera,Maruca vitrata and podfly) and sucking insects (aphids, jassids, pod bug) was reported in IPM plots and maximum population of insects was observed in Non-IPM plots. Percent insect control over non-IPM was 50.98 % for H. armigera, 44.69 % for M. vitrata and 19.17 % for Maruca webbing were recorded. While, for sucking pest complex, insect control over non-IPM was 51.59 %, 40.36 % and 36.17 % against jassids, aphids and tur pod bug, respectively. Similarly, minimum pod borer damage (6.48 and 7.71 %) was recorded in IPM plots as compared to maximum pod borer damage (8.37 and 8.22 %) in non-IPM plots, respectively during 2014 and 2015. Whereas, pooled grain yield for IPM plots was 1286.5 kg/ha for both seasons as against 888 kg/ha in non-IPM plots with 1:2.89 benefit cost ratio. Hence, It is apparent that studied IPM module was able to increase the yield of pigeonepea with lower cost of production as against non-IPM thus it would be benefiting the farmers.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Insect pests, IPM, Non-IPM, Pigeon pea, Validation
Bhede, B. V., Sharma, O. P., Badgujar, A. G., Bhagat, S., Bhosle, B. B. and Khullar, M. (2015). Impact of areawide integrated pest management strategies on pests of pigeonpea and yield in Marathwada region of Maharashtra, India. Legume Research, 38 (1): 101-108
Chandrakar, H. K., Shrivastava S. K. (2002). Evaluation of some combinations of match (Lufenuron) against pod damaging pests in pigeonpea. Journal of Applied Zoological Research, 13: 206–207
Dodia D. A., Prajapathi B. G. and Asharya S. (2009). Efficacy of insecticides against stem borer, H. armigera, infesting Pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes, 22:144–145
FAOSTAT (2015). Compared data of pigeonpea production of India with other countries retrieved July, 10 2016 from http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx.
Gajendran ,G., Chandrasekaran, M. and Jebaraj, S. (2006). Evalution of Integrated Pest Management Module against major insect pest of Blackgram in Rainfed Ecosystem. Legume Research., 29 (1): 53 – 56
ICRISAT (2008). Pigeonpea climbs the mountains of Uttarakhand. retrieved July, 10 2016 from http://www.icrisat.org/newsroom/news-releases/icrisat-pr2008 -media19.htm
Kranthi, K. R., Jadhav, D. R., Kranthi, S., Wanjari, R. R., Ali, S. S. and Russell, D. A. (2002). Insecticides resistance in five major insect pest of cotton in India. Crop Protection, 21: 449-460
Meena, R. S., Srivastava, C. P. and Joshi, N. (2006). Bioefficacy of some newer insecticides against the major insect pests of short duration pigeonpea. Pestology, 30: 13–16
Mittal, V. and Ujagir, R. (2005). Evaluation of naturalize Spinosad 45 SC against pod borer complex in early pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 33: 211–215
Pandey, A. K., Kumar, Bijendra and Dev, C. (2016). Validation of IPM module against major insect – pest and diseases of cabbage in mid-hills of Uttarakhand. Journal of Hill Agriculture, 7 (1): 96-101
Puri, S. N. and Hem, Saxena.( 2003). Menace of Helicoverpa on pulse crops- a continuing challenge. In National Symposium on Pulses for Crop Diversification and Natural Resource Management, December, 20-22, 2003, IIPR, Kanpur. P.14-15
Samiayyan, K. and Gajendran, G. (2009). Evaluation and demonstration of pigeonpea IPM module for pod borer management. The Madras Agricultural Journal, 96 (7-12): 401-403
Sharma, O. P.. Bantewad, S. D, Patange, N. R., Bhede, B. V., . Badgujar, A. G., Ghante, P. H., Kadam, M., Bhagat, S.and Kumari, A. (2015). Implementation of Integrated Pest Management in Pigeonpea and Chickpea Pests in Major Pulse-Growing Areas of Maharashtra. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 15(1):12
Singh H. R., Singh R. N., Yadav K. G., Yadav A. (2009). Efficacy and economics of some bio-pesticide in management of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub) on chickpea. Pestology, 33: 36–37
Singh, H. M., Ali, S., Singh, R. A., Chakraborti, D. K., Singh, V. K., Rajput, S. K. S. and Srivastava, D, K. (2003). Integrated pest management in pigeonpea.
Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 11(1): 145-146
Srinivasa Rao, M., Dharma Reddy, K., 2003. IPM of Pod borers in Long Duration Pigeonpea. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 11 (1): 26-30
Srinivasan T., Durairaj C. (2007). Newer insecticides against pod borer complex of pigeonpea with special reference to Helicoverpa armigera and Melanagromyza obtusa. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 35: (1) 47–49
Srinivasan, G. and Philip Sridhar, R. N. (2008). Evalution of Integrated Pest Management Module against majoe insect pest of rainfed pigeon pea. Legume Res., 31(1): 60 – 62
Sujithra, M. and Subhash, C. (2014). Seasonal incidence and damage of major insect pest of Pigeo pea Cajanus cajan ( L.). Indian Journal of Entomology, 76 (3): 202-206
Ujagir, R. (2000). Field efficacy of insecticides against pod borer complex in early pigeonpea (Cajanuscajan (L.) Millsp. at Pantnagar, North India. Annals of Plant
Protection Sciences, 71: 19-25
Visalakshmi, V., Ranga Rao, G. V. and Arjuna, P. R. (2005). Integrated pest management againt Helicoverpa armigera Hubner in chickpea. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 33 (1): 17-22
Wadaskar, R. M., Bhalkare, S. K. and Patil, A. N. (2013). Field efficacy of newer insecticides against pod borer complex of pigeonpea, Journal of Food Legumes, 26 (1&2): 62-66
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
