Priyanka Thakur K.C. Sharma Deepali Bakshi


The tomato fruitfly, Bactrocera tau (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is one of the most important pests of the family Cucurbitaceae. Toinvestigate local adaptation, we measured the variations in life-histories and life-table parameters among populations from five different geographical regions of North India, Ludhiana (262 mt amsl), Solan (1,502 mt amsl), Hisar (215 mt amsl), Pantnagar (344 mt amsl) and Jaach (733 mt amsl). The principal components analysis showed the life-history and life-table parameters of B. tau differed among the five geographical populations. The highest fecundity of 233.20 eggs/female was recorded in the Jaach population and was statistically at par with Hisar (209.21 eggs/female) followed by Solan (202.60 eggs/female), Pantnagar (178.60 eggs/female) and Ludhiana population (105.88 eggs/female). The total developmental period among the five populations of B. tau was the longest for the Pantnagar population (16.20 days) followed by Solan (13.90 days), Hisar (12.60 days), Ludhiana (12.30 days) and Jaach (11.60 days). The true intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm) was 0.120, 0.138, 0.140, 0.116 and 0.153 for the respective geographical regions while the finite rate of increase (?) was 1.13, 1.15, 1.15, 1.12 and 1.16, thus indicating that the fruit fly from Jaach location is more reproductive than the other five geographical regions of North India. Since the study will be useful in knowing the multiplication rate of fruit fly in specific area, accordingly the management practices for this species can be formulated on the bases of these studies. The results thus indicated the geographical variations among different populations of B. tau.




Bactrocera tau, Fruit fly, Geographical regions, Intrinsic rate

Bhalla, O. P. and Pawar, A. D. (1977). A survey study of insect and non-insect pests ofeconomic importance in Himachal Pradesh. Tiku and TikuKitabMahal,Bombay, 80 pp
Brich, S. (1948). The intrinsic rate of natural increase in insectpopulation. Journal of Animal Ecology, 17: 15-26
Carey, J. R. (1993). Applied demography for biologist withspecial emphasis on insects. Oxford University Press,New York.206 p.
Chaudhary, F. K. and Patel, G. M. (2007). Ovipositional preference of melon fly, B.cucurbitaeCoquilett in its cultivated hosts. Insect Environment, 13(3): 135-137
Dimantidis, A. D., Carey, J. R., Nakas, C. T. and Papadopoulos, N. T. (2011). Ancestral populations perform better in a novel environment: Domestication of Mediterranean fruit fly populations from five global regions. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102:334-345
Gupta,Divender. (1989). Population dynamics of some commonly occurring Tephritidae in Himachal Pradesh. Ph. D Thesis, Dr. Y. S. ParmarUniversityof Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H. P.), 293p.
Howe, R. W. (1953). The rapid determination of intrinsic rateof increase of an insect population. Annals of AppliedBiology, 40:134-155
Huang, Y. and Chi, H. (2012). Life tables of Bactroceracucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): with an invalidation of the jackknife technique. Journal of Applied Entomology. DOI: 10.1111/jen.12002
Huang, Y. B. and Chi, H. (2011). Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Bactroceracucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) with a discussion on the problem of applying female age-specific life tables to insect populations. Insect Science, 8: 1–11
Kashyap, N. P. and Hameed, S. F. (1981). Residue of some organo phosphorous insecticides on/in peach fruits. Himachal Journal of Agriculture Research, 7:46-47
Laskar, N. (2013). Biology and biometrics of melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coq.) on bitter gourd, Momordicacharantia L. and pumpkin, Cucurbita pepo L. Current Biotica, 7(1-2): 51-59
Mir, S. H., Dar, S. A., Mir, G. M. and Ahmad, S. B. (2014). Biology of Bactroceracucurbitae(Diptera: Tephritidae) on cucumber. Florida Entomologist,97(2):753-758
Melinand, N. E. N., Nondenot, A. L. R., Bertille, K. E. A. A., Christian, T. D. K., Adagba,O.andPhilomene, S. K. B.(2016). Comparative study of some parameters biological of BactroceradorsalisandCeratitiscosyra(Diptera: Tephritidae) pests of mango (Mangiferaindica) in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Advances in Biology, 9(3): 1887-1895
Narayanan, E. S. and Batra, H. N. (1960). Fruit flies and their Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, P. 68
Ranganath, H. R. and Veenakumari, K. (1996). Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller): a confirmed host of the melon fly, Bactrocera (Zeugodacus) cucurbitae Coquillett. Insect Environment,2: 3
Singh, S. K., Kumar, D. and Ramamurthy, V. V. (2010). Biology of Bactrocera (Zeugodacus) tau (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Entomological Research, 40(5): 259-263
Tanga, C. M., Manrakhan, A., Daneel, J. H., Mohamed, S. A., Fathiya, K. and Ekesi, S. (2015).Comparative analysis of development and survival of two Natal fruit fly Ceratitis rosa Karsch (Diptera, Tephritidae) populations from Kenya and South Africa. Zookeys, 540: 467-487
White, I. and Elson- Harris, M. M. (1992). Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics. Commonwealth Agriculture Bureau International, Oxon, UK, 601 p
Yang, P. J., Carey, J. R. and Dowell, R. V. (1994). Tephritid fruit flies in China: Historical background and current status. Pan-Pacific Entomologist,70:159–167
Zart, M., Fernandes, O. A. and Botton, M. (2010).Biology and fertility life table of the South American fruit
fly Anastrephafraterculus on grape. Bulletin of Insectology.63(2): 237-242
Research Articles

How to Cite

Comparative analysis of life tables of Bactrocera tau (Diptera: Tephritidae) collected from different geographical regions of North India. (2017). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9(2), 998-1001. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i2.1309