Article Main

Aradhana Bali B. R. Bazaya Sandeep Rawal

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2011 at Research Farm, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chatha, Jammu to evaluate the effect of weed management prac-tices on yield and nutrient uptake of soybean utilizing different resource management strategies. The lowest weed density and dry matter of weeds was recorded with hand weeding at 15 and 35 days after sowing (DAS) which was equally effective as imazethapyr @ 75 g ha -1 (PoE) fb hoeing at 35 DAS and quizalofop-ethyl @ 40 g ha-1 (PoE) fb hoeing at 35 DAS. All weed control treatments had significant effect on yield and nutrient up-take of soybean. Among the different weed control treatments, lowest N, P and K uptake by weeds were recorded in hand-weeding (15 and 35 DAS) which was statistically at par with imazethapyr @ 75 g ha -1 fb hoeing at 35 DAS. The maximum uptake by seed and straw were recorded in weed free which was statistically at par with twice hand weeding at 15 and 35 DAS, imazethapyr @ 75 g ha-1 fb hoeing at 35 DAS and quizalofop-ethyl @ 40 g ha-1 fb hoeing at 35 DAS. The highest seed and straw yield of soybean was harvested with hand-weeding (15 and 35 DAS) followed by imazethapyr @ 75 g ha -1 fb hoeing at 35 DAS. For the first time, soybean crop has been introduced in Jammu region for research purpose. Weed management varies with agro-climatic conditions. The study would be helpful to understand weed menace in this particular climatic condition of Jammu and to manage them combinedly and efficiently.

Article Details

Article Details

Keywords

Nutrient uptake, Resource management, Soybean, Weed control, Yield

References
Chaphale, S.D., Kuchanwar, O.D., Chamate, N.W. and Chafle, B.S. (2003). Effect of weed management on nutrientuptake of soybean and soil properties. Journal of Soils and Crops,13: 179-181.
Dhane, J. B., Jawale, S. M., Shaikh, A. A., Dalavi, N. D. and Dalavi, P. N.(2010). Effec t of integrated weed management on yield and quality of soybean (Glycinemax L.). Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 35: 322-325.
Gupta, A. and Saxena, S. C. (2008). Weed management in soybean (Glycine max L.) in Tarai region of Uttarakhand to sustain productivity. Pantnagar Journal of Research, 6: 1-5.
Kumar, M. and Das, T. K. (2008).Integrated weed management for system productivity and economics in soybean (Glycinemax)-wheat (Triticumaestivum) system. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 53: 189-194.
Meena, D. S. and Jadon, C. (2009). Effect of integrated weed management on growth and yield of soybean (Glycinemax). Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences, 1: 50-51.
Mishra, J. S., Singh, V. P. and Yaduraju, N. T. (2002). Interference of common day flower (Commelinabengalensis L.) in soybean (Glycine max. L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science, 34: 295-296.
Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis, pp 165-167. Asia Publication House, Bombay.
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C.W., Watanade, F. S. and Dean, L. A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus of soil by extraction with NaHCO3. U. S. D. A., Circular No. 939.
SOPA (2014). Estimates of area, productivity & production of Soybean in India during kharif (monsoon). The Soybean Processors Association of India (SOPA).
Subbaiah, B. V. and Asija, G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Current Science, 25: 250-260.
Vyas, M. D., Jain, R. C. and Dubey, S. (2003). Productivity and weed control efficiency of integrated weed management practices in pigeonpea+soybean intercropping system under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 35: 87-89.
Wadafale, A. M., Pagar, P. C., Yenprediwar, M. D. and Benke, P. S. (2011). Effect of some new post emergence herbicides on weed and plant growth parameters of soybean (Glycinemax L.). Journal of Soils and Crops, 21: 258-262.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Weed control in soybean (Glycine max L.) through resource management strategies and its influence on yield and nutrient uptake. (2017). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9(1), 539-543. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i1.1226