Heterosis for post harvest and nutritional quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
Article Main
Abstract
A study was conducted in tomato using an 6 x 6 diallel crossing design excluding reciprocals to quantify the magnitude of heterosis and to identify the best heterotic combinations for post harvest and nutritional quality attributes viz. pericarp thickness (mm), fruit firmness (g/0.503 cm2), shelf life (days), total soluble solids (oBrix), lycopene content (mg/100g) and ascorbic acid (mg/100g) which are considered essential in present day hybrid varieties of tomato from consumer point of view. All the 22 entries (6 parents, 15 F1 hybrids and 1 standard check) were field evaluated using randomized complete block design with three replications during Kharif 2015-16. Highly significant heterosis (5% level of significance) of positive nature was found for pericarp thickness (22.90%, 32.20% and 5.62%), fruit firmness (17.32%, 56.72% and 9.21%), shelf life (17.54%, 24.87% and 9.57%), total soluble solids (24.44%, 51.44% and 34.20%), lycopene content (28.75%, 35.05% and 25.63%) and ascorbic acid (19.07%,
30.00% and 17.85%) over the better, mid and standard check, respectively. Three promising crosses viz., Solan Lalima x EC-1055, Solan Lalima x EC-1057 and Solan Lalima x EC-1058 were identified as high yielding F1 combinations having superiority to post harvest and nutritional quality traits in tomato and can be promoted for release and commercial cultivation.
Article Details
Article Details
Diallel, Heterosis, Nutritional quality, Solanum lycopersicum L
Anonymous. (2014). Handbook of indian horticulture data-base, NHB, Gurgaon. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, pp 48
De Candolle, A. (1886 reprint 1959). Origin of cultivated plants. Hafner Publishing Company, New York, 468 pp.
Droka, D., Kumar, R., Joshi, S. and Yadav, R.K. (2012). Genetic studies of quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under low temperature. Vegetable Science, 39 (2): 189-191
FAO. (1979). Recommended practices for the prevention of mycotoxins in food, feed, and their products. Food Ag-ric Organ UN Rome, Italy, 51: 35–45
Garg, N. and Cheema, D.S. (2011). Assessment of fruit qual-ity attributes of tomato hybrids involving ripening mu-tants under high temperature conditions. Scientia Hor-ticulturae, 131: 29-38
Giovanelli, G., Lavelli, V., Peri, C, and Nobili, S. (1999). Variation in ripening. J Sci Food Agric., 79:1583–1588
Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1983). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York
Graca, A.J.P., Junior, A.T.A., Rodrigues, R., Goncalves, L.S.A., Sudre, C.P., Vivas, M. and Melo, P.C.T. (2015). Heterosis and combining ability of dual-purpose tomato hybrids developed to meet family farmers’ needs in Brazil and Mozambique. Horticultura Brasileira, 33: 339-344
Hedrick, U.P. and Booth, N. (1907). Mendelian characters in tomato. Proceedings of American Society of Horticul-tural Sciences, 5: 19-23
Joshi, A., Thakur, M.C. and Kohli, U.K. (2005). Heterosis and combining ability for shelf life, whole fruit firmness and related traits in tomato. Indian Journal of Horticul-ture, 61(1): 33-36
Kumari, S. and Sharma, M.K. (2011). Exploitation of hetero-sis for yield and its contributing traits in tomato, So-lanum lycopersicum L. International Journal of Farm Sciences, 1(2) : 45-55
Mather, K. and Jinks, J.L. (1971). Biometrical genetics, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, UK.
Premalakshmi, V., Thangaraj, T., Veeraragathatham, D. and Arumugam, T. (2002). Hybrid vigour for yield and shelf life in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). South Indian Hort., 50: 360-369
Ramakrishnan K., Narayanan, P., Vasudevan, V., Muthukumaran, G., and Antony, U. (2010). Nutrient composition of cultivated stevia leaves and the influence of polyphe-nols and plant pigments on sensory and antioxidant properties of leaf extracts. J Food Sci Technol., 47 (1): 27–33
Ranganna, S. (1995). Handbook of analysis and quality con-trol for fruit and vegetable products, 2nd edition. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi
Reddy, V.V.D. and Reddy, B.M.M. (1994). Heterosis for fruit characters in tomato. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 19: 312-314
Rick, C.M. (1969). Origin of cultivated tomato, current status and the problem. International Botanical Con-gress, pp180
Sharma, D. and Thakur, M.C. (2008). Evaluation of diallel progenies for yield and its contributing traits in tomato under mid hill conditions. Indian Journal of Horticul-ture, 65(3): 297-301
Shull, G.H. (1911). Experiments with maize. Bot Gaz., 52: 480-483
Singh, A., Gautam, J.P.S., Upadhyay, M. and Joshi, A. (2005). Heterosis for yield and quality characters in tomato. Crop Research, 29(2): 285-287
USDA Nutrient Data Bank [Online]. http://www.nal.usda.gov/ [accessed may 2016]
Willcox, J.K., Catignani, G.L., Lazarus, S. (2003). Tomatoes and cardiovascular health. Critical Reviews on Food Science and Nutrition, 43 (1):18
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
