Anupam Tiwari A. K. Pal Sarvesh Singh S. P. Singh Vishnu lal Patidar


A study was conducted to evaluate the different guava cultivars for their physico-chemical composition and organoleptic assessment during the year 2012-2013. Results of study indicated that Gorakh Bilas Pasand cultivar proved to be superior on the basis of physical characters (Length-7.64 cm, Breadth-7.79 cm , Weight-240.60 g, Number of seeds per fruit-251 etc.) followed by Lucknow-49. However, Lucknow-49 was found noteworthy in respect of chemical composition (TSS-13.00 oBrix, Acidity-0.50%, pH-5.86, Vitamin C-300.36 mg/100g etc). In organoleptic assessment, it was found that ‘liked very much’ rating was provided by consumer to Lucknow-49. On the basis of overall findings, it was concluded that ‘Lucknow-49’ was superior in most of characters studied and might be one of the promising cultivars for quality fruits under eastern Uttar Pradesh conditions.




Guava, Lucknow-49, Organoleptic assessment, Shelf life, Vitamin C

Amerine, M. A., Pangborn,R. M., and Roessler, E. B. (1965). Principles of sensory evaluation of food. In: Food Science and Technology Monographs. Academic Press, New York Pp, 338-339
Anonymous (1990). Method of analysis of the association of official agricultural chemist, washington, D.C., USA.
Bal, L. M., Ahmad, T., Senapati, A. K. and Pandit, P.S. (2014). Evaluation of quality attributes during storage of guava nectar cv. Lalit from different pulp and tss ratio. J Food Process Technol, 5: 329
Choudhary, M. L. Dikshit, S. N., Shukla, N. and Saxena, R. R. (2012). Studies on physico-chemical properties of different guava varieties under agro-climatic conditions of Chhattisgarh plains. Prog. Hort., 44(2):340-341
Graf, A. B. (1982). Exotica int. pictorial cyclopedia exotic plants. Rochrs company, east rutherford, New Jersey USA. Series 4, Vol. II. pp. 1836-1837
Islam, F., Islam, A., Mansur, M.A. and Rahim, M.A. (2008). Shelf life and quality of guava cv. kazi as affected by stages of ripening, storage temperature and wrapping materials. Prog. Agric. J., 19(2): 1-12
Kalra, S.K. and Tandon, D. K. (1984). Guava nectars from sulphited pulp and their blends with mango nectar. In-dian Food Packer, 38: 74-77
Kaur, S., Shankar, B.C., Sharma, H. K. and Singh C. (2008). Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis pretreatment conditions for enhanced juice recovery from guava fruit using surface methodology. Food and Bioprocess Tech., 2(1): 96-100
Mahour, M. K., Tiwari, R. and Baghel, B. S. (2012). Physico-chemical characteristics of different varieties/germplasm of guava in malwa plateau of Madhya Pradesh. Agri. Sci. Digest, 32 (2): 141 – 144
Marak, J. K. and Mukunda, G. K. (2007). Studies on the performance of open pollinated seedling progenies of guava cv. Apple Colour. Acta Hort., 735: 79-84
Panse, V.G. and Sukhmate, P. V. (1985). Statistical methods for agricultural workers, 4th Edn. ICAR, New Delhi.
Patel, R. K., Yadav, D. S., Babu, K. D., Singh, A. and Yadav, R. M. (2007). Growth, yield and quality of various guava (Psidium guajava L.) Hybrids / cultivars under mid hills of Meghalaya. Acta Hort., 735: 57- 59
Raghav, M. and Tiwari, J. P. (2008). Genetic variability and correlation analysis in guava. Indian J. Hort., 65 (3): 263-270
Ratanpal, H. S. and Dhaliwal, G. S. (2002). Studies on new introduction of guava at Ludhiana. J. of Res., 39 (2):190-196
Siddiq, M. & Nasir, M. (2012). Tropical and subtropical fruits: postharvest physiology, processing and packaging. Wiley-Blackwell, 587-596
Singh, A. and Singh, S. P. (2000). Evaluation of guava varie-ties for quality. Prog. Hort., 32(2):190-196
Singh, S., Singh S. P. and Singh, J. N. (2013). Evaluation of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cultivars under eastern U. P. conditions. Annals of Hort., 6(2): 392-394.
Research Articles

How to Cite

Physico-chemical attributes and organoleptic assessment of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cultivars grown in eastern Uttar Pradesh. (2016). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(4), 1731-1734. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i4.1031