Variable survival ability of rhizobacteria in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) rhizosphere
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
A study was undertaken to compare the survival efficacy of two native, previously characterized bacterial biovars viz. Bacillus subtilis BCU5 and Pseudomonas fluorescens PCU17 with Bacillus subtilis strain MTCC1789 and Pseudomonas fluorescens strain MTCC4828, procured from Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh,
India in cumin rhizosphere and bulk soil. All the four bacterial types were made rifampicin resistant and the mutants were applied as inoculants at the dosage of 6 log, 7 log and 8 log colony forming units (cfu) g-1 dry soil weight in pots containing cumin seedlings. The cfu of rhizosphere and bulk soil of pots was observed per week for four weeks. The results show that the initial population decline is a common feature of bioinoculants. In rhizosphere and bulk soil, the native bacterial biovars survived better than their procured counterparts. The population of P. fluorescens strain MTCC4828r in rhizosphere soil declined faster and reached below detection limit whereas the P. fluorescens biovar PCUr rhizosphere final population dropped to 3.1 log, 2.9 log and 2.13 log cfu g-1 soil dry weight with 8 log, 7 log and 6 log cfu g-1 soil dry weight inoculum treatment, respectively. In contrast to P. fluorescens strain MTCC4828r, the population of B. subtilis strain MTCC1789r stabilized after some decline and was comparable with B. subtilis biovar BCU5 population. Study concludes that the inoculant population decline in soil was the result of lower microbial load carrying capacity of soil than the provided inoculum densities. Also, the native bacteria survived better than procured ones in rhizosphere soil.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Bacillus subtilis, Cumin, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Rhizobacteria, Rhizosphere, Survival
Benizri, E., Baudoin, E. and Guckert, A. (2001). Root Colonization by Inoculated Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 11(5): 557-574.
Bennett, A.J. and Whipps, J.M. (2008). Beneficial microorganism survival on seed, roots and in rhizosphere soil following application to seed during drum priming. Biological Control, 44(3): 349-361.
Bolstridge, N., Card, S., Stewart, A. and Jones, E.E. (2009). Use of rifampicin-resistant bacterial biocontrol strains for monitoring survival in soil and colonisation of pea seedling roots. New Zealand Plant Protection,62:34-40.
Brimecombe, M.J., De Lelj, F.A. and JM Lynch, J.M. (2001). The rhizosphere. the effect of root exudates on rhizosphere microbial populations, Pinton, R., Varanini, Z. and Nannipieri, P. (Eds.), The rhizosphere. biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 95-140.
Fischer, S., Jofré, E., Cordero, P., Gutiérrez Mañero, F. and Mori, G. (2010). Survival of native Pseudomonas in soil and wheat rhizosphere and antagonist activity against plant pathogenic fungi. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 97 (3): 241-251.
Frey-Klett, P., Churin, J.-L., Pierrat, J.-C. and Garbaye, J. (1999). Dose effect in the dual inoculation of an ectomycorrhizal fungus and a mycorrhiza helper bacterium in two forest nurseries. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31(11): 1555-1562.
Kloepper, J.W., Leong, J., Teintze, M. and Schroth, M.N. (1980). Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature, 286(5776): 885-886.
Liu, F., Xing, S., Ma, H., Du, Z. and Ma, B. (2012). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria affect the growth and nutrient uptake of Fraxinus americana container seedlings. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol.
Lucas, J.A., Ramos Solano, B., Montes, F., Ojeda, J., Megias, M. and Gutierrez Mañero, F.J. (2009). Use of two PGPR strains in the integrated management of blast disease in rice (Oryza sativa) in Southern Spain. Field Crops Research, 114(3): 404-410.
Nicholson, W.L., Munakata, N., Horneck, G., Melosh, H.J. and Setlow, P. (2000). Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(3): 548-572.
Orhan, E., Esitken, A., Ercisli, S., Turan, M. and Sahin, F. (2006). Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, growth and nutrient contents in organically growing raspberry. Scientia Horticulturae, 111(1): 38-43.
Pandey, A. and Palni, L.M. (1997). Bacillus species: the dominant bacteria of the rhizosphere of established tea bushes. Microbiol Res, 152(4): 359-365.
van Elsas, J.D. and Overbeek, L.S.v. (1993). Bacterial responses to soil stimuli, Kjelleberg, S. (Ed.), Starvation in bacteria. PlenumPress, New York, pp. 55-79.
van Veen Ja Fau - van Overbeek, L.S., van Overbeek Ls Fau - van Elsas, J.D. and van Elsas, J.D. (1997). Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.
Wei, Z., Yang, X., Yin, S., Shen, Q., Ran, W. and Xu, Y. (2011). Efficacy of Bacillus-fortified organic fertiliser in controlling bacterial wilt of tomato in the field. Applied Soil Ecology, 48(2): 152-159.
Yadav, S.K., Dave, A., Sarkar, A., Singh, H.B. and Sarma, B.K. (2013). Co-inoculated biopriming with Trichoderma, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium improves crop growth in Cicer arietinum and Phaseolus vulgaris. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment & Biotechnology, 6(2): 255-259.
Yan, Z., Reddy, M.S. and Kloepper, J.W. (2003). Survival and colonization of rhizobacteria in a tomato transplant system. Can J Microbiol, 49(6): 383-389.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
