Nine yellow seeded mung (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes were evaluated along with three checks for their yield performance during three years (2007, 2010 and 2011). Pooled analysis of variance and stability analysis were performed. The genotypic (G) Ã— environment (E) interaction and both variance due to genotypes and environment were significant. The portioning of G Ã— E interaction into linear and non-linear components indicated that both predictable and unpredictable components shared the interaction. On the basis of stability parameters, the top yielding genotypes such as BGS-9 (605.444 Kg/Ha), Sel-4 (519.778 Kg/Ha) and China mung (567.000 Kg/Ha) exhibited high mean yield. Based on stability parameters the genotypes YM-5 (459.889 Kg/Ha), YM-8 (451.333 Kg/Ha) exhibited low mean performance along with regression value nearer to unity (bi=1) and non significant deviation from regression (S2 di=0) indicating the high stability and wider adaptability across the three environments. The genotypes BGS-9 (605.444 Kg/Ha) and Sel-4 (519.778 Kg/Ha) exhibited high mean value and bi values (bi>1) and non significant deviation (S2 di < 0) value indicating adapted for high performance environments (These genotypes are sensitive to environments and give maximum yield when inputs are not limited).
G Ã— E Interaction Green gram, Seed Yield, Stability analysis, Vigna radiata ( L.) and Yellow mung
Azab, M.A. (1997). Salt tolerance of two varieties of Mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Zagazig. J. Agric. Res., 24: 11-21
Campbell, B.T. and Jones, M.A. (2005). Assessment of genotype x environment interactions for yield and fibre quality in cotton performance trials. Euphytica, 144: 69-78.
Chakravorty, A. and M. Khanikar, 2002. Studies on maize and pulse intercropping system during summer season. J. Agri. Sci. Soc. North East India, 15(2):188-191
Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
Finlay, K.W. and Wilkinson, G.N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian J. Agric. Res., 14:742-754.
Kamannavar, P.Y., Vijaykumar, A.G., Revanappa, S.B., Ganajaxi, M., Arunkumar, Kuchanur, P.H. and Salimath P.M. (2011). Genotype Ã— Environment interaction in Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) cultivars grown in different agro-climatic zones of Karnataka, Electronic J. Pl. Breed. 2(4):501-505
Manivannan, N., Ramasamy, A and Natarajan, N. (1998). Phenotypic stability analysis in greengram. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 68: 31-32.
Natarajan, C. (2001). Stability of yield and its components in blackgram. Madras Agric. J., 88:409-413,
Nath Anamika , Harer, P. N. and Utpal Dey (2013), Stability analysis and G Ã— E interaction in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek): A review. African J. Agric. Res..8 ( 26), 3340-3347
Patel, J.D. Naika, M.R. Chaudhari, S.B. Vaghelaa, K.O. and Kodappully, V.C. (2009). Stability analysis for seed yield in green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Agric. Sci. Digest, 29: 24-27.
Singh Vijayata, Yadav Ram Kumar, Yadav Rajesh, Malik R. S., Yadav Neelam R., and Singh Jogendra (2013). Stability analysis in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L) wilczek] for nutritional quality and seed yield. Legume Res.- An International Journal, 36(1):56- 61
Verma, S.K., Tuteja, O.P. and Monga, D. (2008). Evaluation for GenotypesÃ—Environment interaction in relation to stable genetic maleâ€™s sterility based Asiatic cotton (Gossypium arborecium) hybrid of north zone. Ind. J. Agric. Sci., 78(4): 375-378.
Westerman, J.M.(1971). Genotype X environment interaction and developmental regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. Inbred lines analysis. Heredity, 26: 93-106
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)