The aim of this study was to identify the diverse macroinvertebrates present in river Mahanadi, Cuttack in India and to evaluate the role of macroinvertebrates in assessing river water quality and pollution level. We conducted field study of the river at Cuttack (85°46’21.29” E 20°28’15.81” N & 85°49’45.23” E 20°30’50.00” N) during 2013-2014 and collected aquatic invertebrate samples from 12 stations on river basin. The samples were analysed to explore the various families of Macroinvertebrates communities present in river Mahanadi, to examine the status of water quality of the river using biological indicators, to determine whether there are relationships between water chemistry and presence of typical macroinvertebrates and to develop a Macroinvertebrates based index to bio-assessment of Mahanadi River. A total of 484 taxa were identified and about 244 taxa of bivalves and 184 taxa of gastropods were collected. Presence of high number of pollution tolerant taxa and pollution sensitive taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Tricoptera and Chironomidae) indicated increased risk of water pollution and calculated biotic score (8), biological monitoring working party (BMWP) score (52), average score per taxa (ASPT) score (4) and macroinvertebrate-based index (MBI) value indicated moderate pollution level in the river. We recorded pH, total hardness, dissolved oxygen (DO), biological oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrite, chloride and total phosphate of water and physico-chemical parameters supported the values of biological assessment of water quality. Studying macaroinvertebrates helped to gain knowledge about aquatic faunal biodiversity in river Mahanadi and to develop a method for diagnosis of the health of river ecosystem and for measuring water pollution level.
Bioassessment, Ecosystem health, Macroinvertebrates, Mahanadi
Anderson, N.H. andSedell, J.R. (1979). Detritus Processing by Macroinvertebrates in Some Ecosystems.Ann. Rev. Entomol 24:357-377.
APHA (1985). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association. New York, USA. 16th ed. pp 1268.
Armitage, P. D., Moss, D., Wright, J.F. and Furse, M.T. (1983). ThePerformance of a New Biological Quality Score SystemBased on Macroinvertebrates Over A Wide Range of Unpol-Luted Running Water Sites. Water Research 17: 333â€“347.
Baker, A., Inverarity,R., Charlton, M. and Richmond, S. (2003). Detecting RiverPollution Using Fluorescence Spectrophotometry: Studies from The Ouseburn, NE England. Environmental Pollution,
Bedoya, D., Novotny, V. andManolakos, E.S. (2009). Instream and Offstream Environmental Conditions and Stream Biotic Integrity: Importance of Scale and Site Similarities for Learning and Prediction. Ecol Model 220: 2393-2406.
Biological Monitoring Working Party. (1978). Final Report: Assessment and Presentation of the Biological Quality of Rivers in Great Britain. BMWP, Department of the Environment, London.
Bonada, N., Prat, N., Resh, V.H. and Statzner, B. (2006). Developments in aquatic insect Biomonitoring: A Comparative Analysis of Recent Approaches. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 495â€“523.
Chapman, D. (1996). Water Quality Assessments: A Guide to the Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring. 2nd Edition, Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, 651.Â http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/noe0419216001
Czerniawska-Kusza, I. (2005). Comparing modified biological monitoring working party score system and several biological indices based on macroinvertebrates for water-quality assessment.Â Limnologica 35(3):169â€“176
Duran, M. (2006). Monitoring Water Quality Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Physicochemical Parameters of Behzat Stream in Turkey. Polish Journal of Enviromental Studies15(5): 709-717.
Emere, M.C and Narisu, C.E. (2007). Macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality of an urbanized stream in Kaduna, Nigeria. Journal of Fisheries International 2(2),152-157.
Faulkner, H., EdmonsBrown, V. and Green, A. (2000). Problems of Quality in Diffusely Polluted Urban Streams The Case of Pymmeâ€™s Brook, North London. Environmental Pollution 109, 91-107.
Hughes, R. M., and Peck, D. V. (2008). Acquiring data for large aquatic resource surveys: the art of compromise among science, logistics, and reality. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27,837â€“859.
JÃ¼ttner, I., Sharma S., DahalB.M. andOrmerod, S.J. (2003).Diatoms as Indicators of Stream Quality in The Kathmandu Valley and Middle Hills of Nepal And India.Freshwater Biology 48: 2065â€“2084.
Macneil, C., Dick, J.T.A., Gibbins, C., Elwood R.W. and Montgomery, I.A. (2002). A Reappraisal Of The Gamma-Rus:AsellusRatio As An Index Of Organic Pollution. Rivers.Water Research 36: 75â€“84
Mason, C.F. (2002). Biology of Freshwater Pollution. 4th Ed. New York, NY, USA: Prentice Hall.
Morse, J.C., Bae, Y.J., Munkhjargal, G., Sangpradub, N., Tanida, K., Vshivkova, T.S., Wang, B., Yang, L. and Yule, C.M., (2007). Freshwater Biomonitoring with Macroinvertebrates in East Asia. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5, 33-42
Ramakrishnan, N. (2003). â€œBio-Monitoring Approaches For Water Quality Assessment In Two Waterbodies At Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu Indiaâ€. In: Martin J. Bunch, V. Madha Suresh and T. Vasantha Kumaran, eds., Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Environment and Health, Chennai, India. pp 374â€“385.
Vinson, M.R. and Hawkins, C.P. (1996). Effects of sampling area and subsampling procedure on comparisons of taxa richness among streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15 (3): pp. 392-399.
Walter, K. D. and Val, H. S. (2016). Nitrogen, Phosphorus, And Eutrophication in Streams. Inland Waters 6, Pp. 155-164.
Ziglio, G., Siligardi, M. andFlaim, G. (2006). Biological Monitoring of Rivers. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, England.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)