Perceptions, attitudes and preferences in agroforestry among rural societies of Kashmir, India
Article Main
Abstract
People’s perceptions, attitudes and preferences in agroforestry have become fundamental elements of sustainable agroforestry management. The study examined the multiplicities and dimensions of people’s perceptions about agroforestry values, attitudes towards agroforestry benefits and resources preferences in agroforestry and their socioeconomic determinants in rural societies of Kashmir. The data were collected from 142 households of 5 villages selected employing multi-stage random sampling. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used for the data analysis. Results indicated that the material values (rank 1st to 3rd) of agroforestry were perceived as the most important while the perception of the non-material values (rank 4th to 10th) were adjudged moderately important. People’s attitudes towards the tangible benefits (rank 1st to 3rd) of agroforestry were highly favourable whereas attitudes towards intangible benefits (rank 4th to 10th) were indifferent. The rural people expressed higher preferences for fuel wood, fodder, vegetable, fruit, and timber (rank 1st to 5th) while moderate or low preferences for medicine, cottage industry/ handicrafts, fiber/ floss, oilseeds and animals/ birds/ insects etc. (rank 6th to 10th). F statistics (p < 0.05) showed significant differences between the material and non-material values, tangible and non-tangible benefits and resources groups. Correlation co-efficients (r) confirmed the importance of socioeconomic attributes in influencing people’s perceptions, attitudes and preferences in agroforestry. The findings will help to refine and enrich the knowledge-base to provide an effective framework for decisions and policy making to sustain and maintain agroforestry health and services. The integration of people’s socio-psychological conditions in sustainable agroforestry management will be effective strategy commensurating the current development and future challenges.
Article Details
Article Details
Agroforestry, Attitudes, Perceptions, Preferences, Socioeconomic attributes
Ajake, A.O. and Enang, E.E. (2012). Demographic and socioeconomic attributes affecting forest ecosystem exploitation and management in the rural communities of cross river state, Nigeria. Ame. Inter. J. Contem. Res., 2(1): 174-184.
Anonymous (2011). Directorate of Economics and Statistics, District Statistics and Evaluation Office, Baramulla, Jammu and Kashmir.
Banyal, R., Masoodi, N.A., Masoodi, T.H., Sharma, L.K. and Gangoo, S.A. (2011). Knowledge and attitude of farmers towards agroforestry practices in north Kashmir- a case study. The Indian For., 137(12): 1377-1381.
Bijalwan, A., Sharma, C.M. and Kediyal, V.K. (2011). Socioeconomic status and livelihood support through traditional agroforestry systems in hill and mountain agroecosystem of Garhwal Himalaya, India. The Indian For., 138(12): 1423-1430.
Dagar, J.C. (2012). Utilization of degraded lands/ habitats and poor quality water for livelihood security and mitigating climate change. Indian J. of Agroforestry, 14(1): 1-16.
Durai, V., Sankar, S. and Chandrashekhara, U.M. (2005). Attitude of the farmers on tree species cultivation in homestead farming. Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products, 12(3): 151-156.
Edwards, A.L. (1969). Techniques of attitude scale construction Vakils, Feffer and Simons Private Ltd., Mumbai.
Edwards, D.M., Jay, M., Jensen, F.S., Lucas, B., Marzano, M., Montagné, C., Peace, A. and Weiss, G. (2012). Public preferences across Europe for different forest stand types as sites for recreation. Ecology and Society, 17(1): 27-36.
Gupta, T., Gupta, R.K. and Raina, K.K. (2009). Socioeconomic factors associated with fuel consumption pattern in rural habitation of Jammu region, Jammu & Kashmir. Indian J. For., 32(3): 387-390.
Islam, M.A. (2008). Availability and consumption pattern of fuel wood, fodder and small timber in rural Kashmir. Environment and Ecology, 26(4A): 1835-1840.
Islam, M.A., Banyal, R., Rai, R. and Singh, P.K. (2012). Determinant factors of agroforestry adoption in North Kashmir. Indian j Soc Res., 53(2): 123-129.
Islam, M.A., Masoodi, N.A. and Gangoo, S.A. (2005). Knowledge and adoption of agroforestry practices among farmers in North Kashmir. Journal of Extension Education, 9/10 (1&2): 12-18.
Islam, M.A., Masoodi, N.A., Masoodi, T.H. and Gangoo, S.A. (2006). Attitude of farmers towards agroforestry plantation in North Kashmir. Journal of Research (BAU), 18(1): 199-204.
Islam, M.A., Quli, S.M.S., Rai, R., Ali, Angrej and Gangoo, S.A. (2015). Forest biomass flow for fuel wood, fodder and timber security among tribal communities of Jharkhand. Journal of Environmental Biology, 36(1): 221-228.
Kareemulla, K., Rizvi, R.H., Yadav, R.S., Munnaram and Dhyani, S.K. (2009). Agroforestry for rural development – cooperatives as viable institutions. Agricult. Situ. India., May, 2009, pp. 61-67.
Khandagale, A.S., Taide, Y.B., Deshmukh, H.K. and Thigale, M.B. (2012). Constraints faced by growers in adoption of recommended practices of teak. Indian J. of Agroforestry, 14(1): 45-48.
Kumar, P, Rawat, L. and Basera, H. (2010). Socioeconomic studies of Henwal Watershed, Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. Indian J. For., 33(2): 149-154.
Kumar, R. (2012). Research Methodology – A step by step guide for beginners. Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, india.
Macura, B., Zorondo-Rodríguez, F., Grau-Satorras, M., Demps, K., Laval, M., Garcia, C.A. and Reyes-García, V. (2011). Local community attitudes toward forests outside protected areas in India- Impact of legal awareness, trust, and participation. Ecology and Society, 16(3): 10-20.
Mukherjee, D. (2013). Studies on Resource Management for Sustainable Ecosystem of Eastern Himalaya. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 1(5): 222-235.
Mushtaq, T., Sood, K.K. and Raina, N.S. (2012). Species preferences for fuel wood in Shiwalik Himalayas- Implications for agroforestry plantations. Indian J Hill Fmg., 25(2): 18-21.
Nagesha, G. and Gangadharappa, N.B. (2006). Adoption of agroforestry systems in north eastern districts of Karnataka. My Forest, 42(4): 337-347.
Pal, G. (2011). Socio-economic characteristics of lac growers in Kanker district of Chhattisgarh. The Indian For., 137(11): 1294-1297.
Palett, A., Isabella, D.M., Cantiani, M.G. and Maino, F. (2013). Social perceptions and forest management strategies in an Italian Alpine community. Mountain Research and Development, 33(2):152-160.
Pandey, R. (2009). Forest resource utilization by tribal community of Jaunsar, Uttarakhand. The Indian For., 135(5): 655-662.
Pant, N. (2011). Motivational factors in activities of agroforestry – a case study. The Indian For., 137(3): 363-569.
Prakash, O. and Sharma, R. (2008) Determining people’s participation in forest fire control: A study of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. For., 31(1): 1-6.
Quli, S.M.S. and Singh, P.K. (2010). Choice of species for traditional agroforestry by tribes in Jharkhand. Jharkhand J. Develop. Manag. Stud., 8(1): 3727-3735.
Ratsimbazafy, C.L., Harada, K. and Yamamura, M. (2012). Forest resources use, attitude and perception of local residents towards community based forest management: Case of the Makira Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) Project, Madagascar. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ., 4(13): 321-332.
Rawat, Y.S. and Vishvakarma, S.C.R. (2011). Pattern of fodder utilization in relation to sustainability under indigenous agroforestry systems, North-Western Himalaya, India. Environ. We Int. J. Sci. Tech., (6): 1-13.
Ray, G.L. and Mondol, S. (2004). Research Methods in Social Sciences and Extension Education, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, 66-76.
Reddy, E.V. (2011). Constraints in marketing of agroforestry produce in India. The Indian For., 137(6): 669-677.
Rout, S.D. and Panda, S.K. (2011). Seasonal availability of nontimber forest products collected by the tribals in Gandigadha Reserve Forests of district Mayurbhanj, Orissa. The Indian For., 137(11): 1289-1293.
Roy, M.M. and Tiwari, J.C. (2012). Agroforestry for climate resilient agriculture and livelihood in arid region of India. Indian J. of Agroforestry, 14(1): 49-59.
Sati, V.P. and Song, C. (2012). Estimation of forest biomass flow in the montane mainland of the Uttarakhand Himalaya. Inter. J. For. Soil Erosion., 2(1): 1-7.
Singh, P., Tewari, P. and Rani, S. (2007). Socio-economic status of rural households in Kumaon region of Uttarakhand. Pantnagar Journal of Research, 5(1): 146-150.
Singh, P.K. and Quli, S.M.S. (2011). Economic valuation of non-timber forest product’s contribution in tribal livelihood in West Singhbhum district of Jharkhand. The Indian For., 137(11): 1258-1264.
Singha, A.K., Talukdar, R.K. and Singha, J.K. (2006). Maintenance behaviour of forest resources by the people of forest villagers in Assam. Indian J. For., 29 (1): 47-54.
Sinha, B., Kala, C.P. and Katiyar, A.S. (2010) Enhancing livelihoods of forest dependent communities through synergizing FDA activities with other development programs. RCNAEB sponsored project, Indian Institute of Forest Management (IIFM), Bhopal.
Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1967). Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa-50010.
Sood, K.K., Najiar, C., Singh, K.A., Handique, P., Singh, B. and Rethy, P. (2008). Association between socio-economic parameters and agroforestry uptake: evidences from eastern Himalaya, Indian J. For., 31(4): 559-564.
Sreenath, D. and Veerabhadraiah, V. (1993). A study on the attitude of farmers towards social forestry programme. My Forest, 29(2): 117-120.
Venkataramaiah, P. (1990). Development of socio-economic status scale, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Extension, UAS, Bangalore.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) © Author (s)
