##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Vinaya Kumar Yadav Mamta Kajla S. P. Singh A. K. Singh R. K. Yadav Ajeet Kumar Dwivedi

Abstract

Globally more than one-third of the irrigated area is under waterlogging which limits our wheat production and out of which northern Indo-Gangetic plains of India alone had 2.5 million ha affected by irregular waterlogging. So, to meet out the food demand of ever-growing population we have to find some alternates to harness the potential of the waterlogged area. With this point of view this investigation was conducted to study the changes in growth and biochemical behavior of wheat due to waterlogging at ear emergence stage in sodic soil and also to assess the traits conferring higher yield at experimental site of department of crop physiology, Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.), India. The results showed that the genotypic variability exists for waterlogging tolerance in wheat varieties evaluated under investigation. HD-2009 which is susceptible to waterlogging gave poor performance in terms of growth parameters, biochemical behavior and traits conferring higher yield under waterlogging conditions at ear head emergence stage in sodic soil as compared to HD-2851, KRL-3-4 and KRL-99 wheat varieties. KRL-99 (1.80g yield plant-1) gave best results followed KRL-3-4 (1.37g yield plant-1) by under waterlogged conditions at ear head emergence stage in sodic soil.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Biochemical parameter, Growth parameter, Waterlogging tolerance, Yield parameter

References
Anonymous (2013-14). Agricultural statistics division, Director-ate of economics and statistics, New Delhi from agri-coop.nic.in/Annualreport2013-14/artp13-14ENG.pdf.
Arnon, D.I. (1949). Copper enzymes is isolated chloroplast, polyphenyloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physio.24: 1-15.
Bao, X. (1997). Study on identification stages index of wa-terlogging tolerance in various genotype (Triticum aes-tivum L.). Acta Agriculture Shanghai, 13 (2) : 32-38.
Baranwal, Sarita and Singh, B.B. (2002). Effect of waterlog-ging on growth, chlorophyll and saccharides content in maize genotypes. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 7 (3) : 246-251.
Brisson, N.; Rebiere, B.; Zimmer, D. and Renault, P. (2002). Response of the root system of a winter wheat crop to waterlogging. Plant & Soil, 243 : 43-55.
Curne, D.C. and Galston, A.W. (1959). Inverse effect of gibberellins in peroxidase activity during growth in dwarf strain of pea and corn. Pl. Physiol., 34 : 416-418.
Das, K.K. and Sarkar, R.K. (2003). Post flood changes on the status of chlorophyll, carbohydrate & nitrogen con-tent and its association w with submergence tolerance in rice. Plant Arciver, 1 (1-2): 15-19.
Dong, D.F., Luo, B.S. and Chen, D.Q. (1998). Comparative study on some physiological characteristics of wheat waterlogged at seedling & booting stage. J. Guangxi Agri. Univ., 17 (4) : 351-355.
FAO (2014). Food and Agriculture Organisation of the united nations statistics division www. Faostat3.fao.org/browse/q/*/e (accessed on 21 August, 2015)
Gardner, W.K. and Flood, R.G. (1993). Less waterlogging damage with long season wheat, Cereal Res. Comm., 21 : 337-343.
Gill, K.S., Aligadarand and Singh, K.N. (1992). Response of wheat genotypes to sodicity in association with water-logging at different stages of growth. Indian J. Agri. Sci., 62 (12) : 124-129.
Kumar, R. and Singh, R. (1981). Free sugars and their rela-tionship with rain size and starch content in developing wheat grains. J. Sci. Food and Agri., 32 :229-234.
Mc Cready, R.M., Guggols, J., Silviers, V. and Owen, H.S. (1950). Determination of starch and amylase in vegeta-ble. Ann. Chem., 22 : 1156-1158.
Mielke, M.S., Schaffer, B. (2010). Photosynthetic and growth responses of Eugenia uniflora L. seedlings to soil flooding and light intensity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 68: 113-121.
Neog, B., Gogoi, Nirmali and Baruah, K.K. (2002). Morpho-logical changes associated with waterlogging changes associated with waterlogging in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 72 (7) : 404-407.
NRSA (2005). Wasteland Atlas of India. Ministry of Rural Development and National remote sensing center Publ., NRSA, Hyderabad.
OECD- FAO (2013). Agricultural outlook: Highlights. OECD Agriculture Statistics from www.oecd-ilibrary.org/ agriculture.
Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1978). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 3:147-148.
Prasad, Shambhoo; Ram, P.C. and Singh, Uma (2004). Ef-fect of waterlogging duration on chlorophyll content, nitrate reductase activity, soluble sugar and grain yield of maize. Ann. Plant Physiol., 18 (1) : 1-5
Savita, U.S., Rathore, T.R. and Mishra, H.S. (2004). Re-sponse of some maize genotypes to temporary waterlog-ging. J. Plant Biol., 31 (1) : 29-36.
Sayre, K.D., Van Ginkel, K., Raja Ram andS., Qritz-monasperio, I. (1994). Tolerance to waterlogging losses in sping bread wheat effect of time of onset on experef-fion. In : Annual Wheat Newsletter No. 14 Colorado State University pp165-171.
Shao, G.C., Yu, S.E., Liu, N. (2010). Study on continuous days of water logging and excessive soil water as drain-age index of wheat. Trans. CSAE 26: 56-60.
Sharma, D.P., Singh, M.P., Gupta, S.K. and Sharma, N.L. (2005a). Response of pigeonpea to short-term water stagnation in a moderately sodic soil under field condi-tions. Journal of The Indian Society of Soil Science, 53 (2) : 243-248.
Sharma, P.K., Sharma, S.K. and Goswami, C.L. (2005b). Individual and combined effects of alkalinity and water-logging stresses on germination and seedling growth in two varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Plant Bio., 32 (2) : 133-137.
Sharma, S.K., Praveen, K.S., Setter, T.L. and Singh, K.N. (2004). Genetic diversity in waterlogging tolerance of wheat genotypes in neutral and sodic soil at the seed germination stage. In :Proceeding of International Con-ference of Sodicity, Lucknow, pp. 264-267.
Singh, Anuradha, Ram, P.C., Singh, A.K. and Singh, B.B. (2002). Phenotypic differences in response to submer-gence in rainfed lowland rice. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 7 (4) : 309-313.
Sinha, S.K. (1972). Chlorometric assay of catalase. Analyti-cal Biochemistry, 47 ; 2-5.
USDA (2014). United states Department of Agriculture For-eign Agricultural service www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline, accessed on 21 August 2015
Watson, E.R., Lapins, P. and Barron, R.J.W. (1976). Effect of waterlogging on the growth, grain and straw yield of wheat, barley and oat. Aust. J. Exp. Agri. Anim. Husb., 16 : 114-122.
Yemm E. W. and Willis A. J. (1954). The estimation of car-bohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J. 57(3): 508–514.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Effect of waterlogging tolerance in wheat (Tritium aestivum L.) at ear emergence stage on growth, biochemical and yield parameters in sodic soil. (2015). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7(2), 949-954. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i2.712