Govindaraj T N. Maragatham S P. Ramanathan V. Geethalakshmi M. K. Kalarani


Intercropping is growing two or more crop species simultaneously, different canopy architectures by row configuration, changing light interception, radiation utilisation, and increased yield. The present study aimed to evaluate different intercropping systems affected light interception per cent and radiation use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping with greengram (Vigna radiata L.) different ratios. Field experiments were conducted for Kharif 2022 and Rabi 2022-2023 seasons, which were laid out in a split-plot design and replicated three times. Three Nitrogen levels viz., N1 - 75 % RDN (Recommended dose of Nitrogen), N2 – 100% RDN, N3-125% RDN had taken as the main plot and three intercropping treatments were taken as subplot viz., M2G2- replacement series (two row of maize and two row of Greengram), M4G2- replacement series (four rows of maize and two row of Greengram), M2G3-paired row system (two rows of maize and three rows of Greengram), and sole maize. Both light interception and radiation use efficiency were significantly affected by intercropping systems. Light interception per cent of the main crop (maize) was significantly higher (69.0, 75.5 and 71.0 % during Kharif and 60.1, 78.1 and 76.6 during rabi) at vegetative, flowering and maturity phases, respectively. The Kharif 2022 and Rabi 2022-2023 maximum Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE) of Maize intercropping with green gram (maize + greengram) was higher in T12 (M2G3 paired row with 125 % Recommended Dose of Nitrogen) recorded as 2.46 (Kharif) and 1.43 (rabi). The outcome might be utilised to optimise the row configuration of intercropping design, explain the mechanism of intercropping on light utilisation, and improve radiation use efficiency.




Greengram, Intercropping, Light interception, Maize, Radiation use efficiency

Du, X., Wang, Z., Lei, W. & Kong, L. (2021). Increased planting density combined with reduced nitrogen rate to achieve high yield in maize. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 358.
Gao, Y., Duan, A., Qiu, X., Sun, J., Zhang, J., Liu, H. & Wang, H. (2010). Distribution and use efficiency of photosynthetically active radiation in strip intercropping of maize and soybean. Agronomy journal, 102(4), 1149-1157.
India Agristat (2020). Area, production, and average yield, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation report, New Delhi. http://www.indiaagristat.com
Keating B. A. & Carberry, P. S. (1993). Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation. Field Crops Res.,34, 273–301.
Liu, X., Rahman, T., Yang, F., Song, C., Yong, T., Liu, J., ... & Yang, W. (2017). PAR interception and utilization in different maize and soybean intercropping patterns. PloS one, 12(1), e0169218.
Maitra, S., Palai, J. B., Manasa, P. & Kumar, D. P. (2019). Potential of intercropping system in sustaining crop productivity. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 12(1), 39-45.
Naher, Q. & Hossain, M. A. (2021). Light Interception and Productivity of Maize Intercropped with Legumes in Kharif Season. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal, 24(2), 137-149.
Raza, M. A., Feng, L. Y., van der Werf, W., Cai, G. R., Khalid, M. H. B., Iqbal, N. & Yang, W. (2019). Narrow‐wide‐row planting pattern increases the radiation use efficiency and seed yield of intercrop species in relay‐intercropping system. Food and Energy Security, 8(3), e170.
Raza, M. A., Yasin, H. S., Gul, H., Qin, R., Mohi Ud Din, A., Khalid, M. H. B., ... & Yang, W. (2022). Maize/soybean strip intercropping produces higher crop yields and saves water under semi-arid conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1006720.
Subo, M., Walker, S. & Mukhala, E. (2001). Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Res., 71: 17–29.
Tsubo, M. & Walker, S. (2002). A model of radiation interception and use by a maize–bean intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 110(3), 203-215.
Valadabadi, S. A. & Farahani, H. A. (2010) Effect of planting density and pattern on physiological growth indices in maize (Zea mays L.) under nitrogenous fertilizer application. J Agric Ext Rural Dev 2: 40-47. Link: https://bit.ly/3jT1QZY.
Wang, Z. K., Zhao, X. N., Wu, P. T., He, J.Q., Chen, X.L. , Gao Y. (2015). Radiation interception and utilization by wheat/maize strip intercropping systems. Agr Forest Meteorol., 204: 58–66.
Wang, Q., Sun, Z., Bai, W., Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., Wang, R. & Zhang, L. (2021). Light perception and use efficiency differ with maize plant density in maize-peanut intercropping. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 8(3), 432-446.
Wang, R., Sun, Z., Zhang, L., Yang, N., Feng, L., Bai, W., Zhang, D., Wang, Q., Evers, J.B., Liu, Y., Ren, J., Zhang, Y., van der Werf, W. (2020). Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping. Field Crops Res., 107819.
Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Wu, P., Gao, Y., Yang, Q. & Shen, Y. (2017). Border-row effects on light interception in wheat/maize strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Res, 214, 1–13.
Citation Format
How to Cite
Light interception and radiation use efficiency (RUE) in maize (Zea mays. L) intercropping with greengram (Vigna radiata L.). (2023). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 15(3), 1044-1050. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i3.4751
More Citation Formats:
Research Articles

How to Cite

Light interception and radiation use efficiency (RUE) in maize (Zea mays. L) intercropping with greengram (Vigna radiata L.). (2023). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 15(3), 1044-1050. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i3.4751