Nivetha C Paulpandi V K Durai Singh R Kumutha K Kannan P


Food and nutritional security for the country India depends on the agriculture sector. Groundnut is an important food legume cum oilseed crop and weed infestation is the major problem causing yield reduction. Therefore, the field experiment study was conducted during the winter season of 2022 at Central farm, Agriculture College and Research Institute in Madurai to evaluate the newer multi-mix herbicide combinations and find out the appropriate weed management practices for yield enhancement and weed suppression in irrigated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The experiment consisted of twelve treatments (T1 to T12) laid out in a randomized complete block design. Among the weed flora, almost two third of the weed infestation was documented as broad-leaved weeds (51%), followed by grassy weeds (36%) and less infestation by sedges (13%) in groundnut at the experimental site. Application of pre-emergence alone and post-emergence alone does not suppress the weed infestation efficiently. For that, this study focused on using multi-mixed herbicides along with hand weeding to determine herbicide's efficacy on weed control and growth parameters. Among the weed control methods, weed-free check (T12) increased the growth parameters viz., Plant height (65.3 cm), Leaf Area Index (4.34) and Dry matter accumulation (5536 kg ha-1) and higher weed control efficiency (99.2%). Among the herbicidal treatments, pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (ready mix) followed by hand weeding at 40 days after sowing (T7) gave significantly (P=0.05) higher results in growth components of groundnut and weed suppression compared to other herbicidal treatments.




Groundnut, Herbicide combinations, Pre-emergence, Post-emergence, Weed control efficiency

Channappagoudar, B. B., Koti, R. V., Biradar, N. R. & Bharmagoudar, T. D. (2008). Influence of herbicides on physiological and biochemical parameters in radish. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 21(1), 8-11.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2021). World Food and Agriculture - Statistical Yearbook 2021. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4477en
Gomez, K. A. & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & sons.
India statistics. (2019-20). Available: www.indiastat.com, 2019-20.
Jadhav, P. B., Rajesh, S. & Kamble, D. R. (2015). Effect of weed control methods on growth and yield of groundnut. Advance Research Journal of Crop improvement, 6(2), 151-157.
Jadhav, P.S. (2007). Comparative study of weed management practices in kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) M.Sc. (Agri) thesis submitted to M P.K.V. Rahuri (India).
Kadavkar, V.J. (1999). Integrated weed management in Kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) M.Sc (Agri) Thesis Submitted to Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri (India).
Kalhapure, A.H., Shete, B.T. & Bodake, P.S. (2013). Integration of chemical and cultural methods for weed management in groundnut. Indian J Weed Sci., 45(2), 116-119.
Kirde, G.D., Ghotmukale, A.K. & Bhutda, P.O. (2019). Effect of integrated weed management on growth and yield of kharif groundut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International journal of chemical studies, 7(5), 4512-4514.
Korav, S., Ram, V., Krishnappa, R. & Premaradhya, N. (2020). Agro-physiological assessment of weed interference in groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) at Sub-Himalayan hill region of Meghalaya. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 49(2), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v49i2.493 12.
Kumari, S., Pandit, A., Raj, R. K., Banerjee, M. & Malik, G. C. (2021). Efficacy of Flumioxazin 50% SL on weed dynamics, yield and economics of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.).The Pharma Innovation Journal, 10 (9), 1835-1839.
Kumawat, M. (2014). Integrated weed management in kharif groundnut. M.Sc. (Agri.). Thesis submitted to College of Agriculture, Kolhapur, (India).
Mishra, K. (2020). Effect of weed management practices on weed control, yield, and economics in Rabi groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Ganjam district of Odisha. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9 (2), 2435-2439.
Mohanty, A., Jena, S. N. & Swain, S. K. (2019). Efficacy of conventional and herbicidal approach on weed flora in Rabi groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International journal of chemical studies, 7(1), 898-900.
Olsen, S.R. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture. 933-940.
Rao, S. S., Madhavi, M. & Reddy, C. R. (2011). Integrated approach for weed control in Rabi groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). ANGRAU J. Res., 39(1), 60-63.
Sagvekar, V.V., Waghmode, B.D., Chavan, A.P. & Mahadkar, U.V.(2015). Weed management in rabi groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) for konkan region of Maharashtra. Indian Journal Agronomy, 60(1), 116-120.
Shah, M. H. & Pramanik, K. (2020). Bio-efficacy of herbicides weed management in groundnut under lateritic soil of West Bengal. Journal of Crop and Weed, 16(1), 199-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2020.v16.i 1.1294.
Sonwalkar, S.N. (2005). Effect of weed control methods and planting layout on growth and yield of Kharif groundnut. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis submitted to Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri (India).
Stanford, G. & English, L. (1949). Use of the flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca.
Subbiah, B.V. & Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in the soil. Current Science, 25, 259-260.
Suseendran, K., Kalaiselvi, D., Kalaiyarasan, C., Jawahar, S. & Ramesh, S. (2019). Impact of weed flora in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in clay loam soils in Dharmapuri district, Tamil nadu, India. Plant Archives, 19(1), 679-682.
Wesley, J. V., Burke, I. C., Clewis, S. B., Thomas W. E. & Wilcut, J. W. (2008). Critical period of grass Vs. broad leaf weed interference in peanut. Weed Technol., 22, 68-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-037.1
Research Articles

How to Cite

Impact of multi mix herbicide on growth and weed indices in irrigated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). (2022). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 14(4), 1526-1531. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v14i4.3902