Article Main

Gudapati Ashoka Chakravarthy M. Thiruppathi S. Kandasamy K. Dhanasekaran

Abstract

Crop residue incorporation is a key component of sustainable cropping systems. It reduces the adverse effects of residue burning and enhances soil fertility. Effective usage of crop residue in the field and proper management are required. With this background, a field experiment was conducted during 2020 – 21 in the maize-rice cropping sequence at Annamalai University Experimental Farm, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu to find out the residual effect of different mulching practices adopted in preceding maize crop and maize stubble incorporation on the growth, yield and economics of transplanted rice Var. ADT 46. The field experiment was conducted in Factorial Randomized Block Design with three replications. In factor I, soil moisture conservation in preceding maize crop viz., mulching of sugarcane trash, water hyacinth, hydrogel and control were allotted. In factor II, different levels of maize crop stubble incorporation on rice viz., 0, 33, 66 and 100% were provided. Water hyacinth mulched plot (M3) to the preceding crop registered significantly (þ <0.05) higher yield parameters, yield and economic returns of succeeding rice. The lower values were observed in unmulched (M1) plot. With respect to maize crop stubble incorporation on rice crop, the incorporation of 66% (SI3) of maize stubble registered higher yield parameters, yield and economic returns. In the interaction effects, mulching with water hyacinth to preceding maize + maize crop stubble incorporation at 66% in rice crop (M3SI3) recorded significantly (þ <0.05) higher yield parameters, yield and economic returns than other treatments. The lowest values were recorded with an unmulched + 100% crop residue incorporated (M1SI4) plot. Mulching the preceding maize crop with water hyacinth at a rate of 12 t ha-1 and incorporating 66% maize stubble into the transplanted rice (M3SI3) had a remarkable yield advantage and financial rewards.

Article Details

Article Details

Keywords

Economics, Mulch, Residue incorporation, Rice yield

References
Alam, A., Srivastava, S.K., Anand, K., Sinha, P.B. & Mishra, P.K. (2017). Response of water hyacinth as a source of potassium in the production of potato. Int. J. Innovative Res. in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(7), p.10. DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607294
Allen, J., Pascual, K. S., Romasanta, R. R., Trinh, M. V., Thach, T. V., Hung, N. V. & Chivenge, P. (2020). Rice straw management effects on greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options. In Sustainable Rice Straw Management (pp. 145-159). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32373-8_9
Bhuvaneshwari, S., Hettiarachchi, H. & Meegoda, J. N. (2019). Crop residue burning in India: policy challenges and potential solutions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16(5), 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050832
Blanco-Canqui, H., Lal, R., Post, W. M., Izaurralde, R. C. & Owens, L. B. (2006). Rapid changes in soil carbon and structural properties due to stover removal from no-till corn plots. Soil science, 171(6), 468-482.doi: 10.1097/01.ss.0000209364.85816.1b
Chowdhury, S., Bolan, N., Farrell, M., Sarkar, B., Sarker, J.R., Kirkham, M.B., Hossain, M.Z. & Kim, G.H. (2021). Role of cultural and nutrient management practices in carbon sequestration in agricultural soil. Advances in Agronomy, 166, pp.131-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2020.10.001
Coonan, E. C., Kirkby, C. A., Kirkegaard, J. A., Amidy, M. R., Strong, C. L. & Richardson, A. E. (2020). Microorganisms and nutrient stoichiometry as mediators of soil organic matter dynamics. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 117(3), 273-298.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-020-10076-8
Dhar, D., Ashim, D., Nirmalendu, B., Niladri, P., Shrikant, B. & Thomas, T. (2014). Residual effect of crop residues on growth, yield attributes and soil properties of wheat under rice-wheat cropping system. Indian J. Agriculture Res. 48 (5): 373-378.
Fang, Y., Nazaries, L., Singh, B. K. & Singh, B. P. (2018). Microbial mechanisms of carbon priming effects revealed during the interaction of crop residue and nutrient inputs in contrasting soils. Global Change Biology, 24(7), 2775-2790. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14154
Gao, LW., Ma, L., Zhang, WF., Wang, FH., Ma, WQ. & Zhang, FS. (2009) Estimation of nutrient resource quantity of crop straw and its utilization situation in China. T Chinese Soc Agric Eng 25:173–179.
Ghimire, R., Lamichhane, S., Acharya, B. S., Bista, P. & Sainju, U. M. (2017). Tillage, crop residue, and nutrient management effects on soil organic carbon in rice-based cropping systems: A review. J. integrative agriculture, 16(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61337-0
Gojiya, A., Deb, D. & Iyer, K. K. (2019). Feasibility study of power generation from agricultural residue in comparison with soil incorporation of residue. Renewable Energy, 134, 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.003
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (2010). Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd ed), John Wiley and Sons, New York, Pp 97-107.
Indulekha, V.P. & Thomas, C.G. (2018) Utilization of water hyacinth as mulch in turmeric. J. Trop. Agric. 56, 27–33.
Kumar, M., Mitra, S., Mazumdar, S. P., Majumdar, B., Saha, A. R., Singh, S. R. & Hossain, A. (2021). Improvement of soil health and system productivity through crop diversification and residue incorporation under jute-based different cropping systems. Agronomy, 11(8), 1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081622
Leal, O. A., Amado, T. J., Fiorin, J. E., Keller, C., Reimche, G. B., Rice, C. W. & Schwalbert, R. (2020). Linking Cover Crop Residue Quality and Tillage System to CO2-C Emission, Soil C and N Stocks and Crop Yield Based on a Long-Term Experiment. Agronomy, 10(12), 1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121848
Li, Z., Zhang, X., Xu, J., Cao, K., Wang, J., Xu, C. & Cao, W. (2020). Green manure incorporation with reductions in chemical fertilizer inputs improves rice yield and soil organic matter accumulation. J. Soils and Sediments, 20(7), 2784-2793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02622-2
Memon, M. S., Guo, J., Tagar, A. A., Perveen, N., Ji, C., Memon, S. A. & Memon, N. (2018). The effects of tillage and straw incorporation on soil organic carbon status, rice crop productivity, and sustainability in the rice-wheat cropping system of eastern China. Sustainability, 10(4), 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040961
Nyambo, P., Taeni, T., Chiduza, C. & Araya, T. (2018). Effects of maize residue biochar amendments on soil properties and soil loss on acidic Hutton soil. Agronomy, 8(11), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8110256
Porichha, G. K., Hu, Y., Rao, K. T. V. & Xu, C. C. (2021). Crop residue management in India: Stubble burning vs. other utilizations including bioenergy. Energies, 14(14), 4281. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144281
Singh, T. B., Ali, A., Prasad, M., Yadav, A., Shrivastav, P., Goyal, D. & Dantu, P. K. (2020). Role of organic fertilizers in improving soil fertility. In Contaminants in Agriculture (pp. 61-77). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/1 0.1007/978-3-030-41552-5_3
Thiruppathi, M. (2017). Diversification of existing rice-based cropping system for sustained productivity under delayed onset of monsoon. European J. Biotech. and Biosci., 5(4): 80-82.
Tomer, A., Singh, R., Singh, S.K., Dwivedi, S.A., Reddy, C.U., Keloth, M.R.A. & Rachel, R. (2021). Role of fungi in bioremediation and environmental sustainability. In Mycoremediation and Environmental Sustainability (pp. 187-200). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54422-5_8
Urra, J., Alkorta, I. & Garbisu, C. (2019). Potential benefits and risks for soil health derived from the use of organic amendments in agriculture. Agronomy, 9(9), 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090542
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Effect of in situ soil moisture conservation practices on maize and its crop residue incorporation on yield and economics of succeeding transplanted rice Var. ADT 46. (2022). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 14(4), 1198-1203. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v14i4.3820