Article Main

Dinesh Singh Ankush Thakur K. Kumar J. C. Rana M.G. Bhoyar Nirmla Chauhan

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out in field gene bank of NBPGR Regional Station Phagli, Shimla during the year 2014-15. Twenty accessions of Prunus armeniaca L. namely St. Ambroise, Wenatchee, Nugget, Stirling, Nari, Harogem, Rakovslik, Viva Gold, IC-432145, Erevani, Safed Perchinar, KS-1, AS-1, AS-2, NJ-A96, Jordan Early, Vitillo, Shahib, Kalola and Anglo Arsani were evaluated for their tree, foliage, floral and fruit characters. St. Ambroise recorded maximum tree height (10.10 m) whereas minimum (2.47 m) was in Stirling. Shedding of leaf started from 29 th October (Nugget) and extended till 27 th November (Vitillo). Time of full bloom extended from 16 th March in Shahib to 23 rd March in Safed Perchinar. The longest duration (22 days) of flowering was recorded in Erevani and shortest (9 days) in Wenatchee. Time of fruit maturity was early (25 th May) in Shahib and late (26 th June) in Vitillo. Largest and heaviest fruits were observed in St. Ambroise (77.59 g) whereas smallest and lightest fruits were in Viva Gold (19.37 g). Maximum pulp to stone ratio was recorded in Safed Perchinar (33.21) and minimum in Nari (15.57). TSS content was maximum (19.56 °B) in Nari whereas minimum (10.73°B) in Anglo Arseni. Titratable acidity was recorded maximum (1.86 %) in AS-1 and minimum (0.76%) in IC 432145. Total sugar content ranged from 8.40 per cent in Anglo Arseni to 16.53 per cent in Nari. Total phenol content was maximum (89.57 mg/100 g) in AS-1 and minimum (70.41 mg/100 g) in IC432145. From the present investigation it may be concluded that St. Ambroise, Nari and Shahib can be used for gene source for developing new hybrid cultivars and St. Am-broise may be suggested for cultivation in wet temperate condition of Himachal Pradesh for its better quality.

Article Details

Article Details

Keywords

Apricot, Characterization, Evaluation, Gene source

References
Akin, B.E, Karabulut, I. and Topcu, A. (2008). Some compositional properties of main Malatya apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) varieties. Food Chemistry 107: 939-948
Ali, S, Masudi, T. and Abbasi, K.S. (2011). Physio-chemical characteristics of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) grown in northern areas of Pakistan. Scientia Horticulturae, 130(2): 386-392
Anonymous (1979). Statistical database. http//www. fao. org.in.
Anonymous (2013). Statistical database. http//www. fao. org.in.
Anonymous (2014). Statistical database of Himachal Pradesh. http://hpplanning.nic.in/statistics&data.html.
AOAC. (1970). Official Methods of Analysis Benjamin Franklin Statistics, Washington, D.C.
Asma, B. M., Kan, T. and Birhanli, O. (2007). Characterization of promising apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genetic resources in Malatya, Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54: 205-212
Bhat, M. Y., Padder, B. A., Wani, I. A., Banday, F. A., Ahsan, H., Dar, M. A. and Lone, A. (2013). Evaluation of apricot cultivars based on physico-chemical characteristics observed under temperate conditions. International J. Agri. Sci., 3(5):535-537
Caliskan, O., Bayazit, S. and Sumbul, A. (2012). Fruit quality and phytochemical attributes of some apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars as affected by genotypes and season. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 40(2): 284-294
IBPGR. (1984). Apricot Descriptors (eds. R Gurriero and R Watkins).31p.
Kamrani, R. (2013). Identity of some Iranian apricot with fruit morphological markers (Fruit Characteristics). Annals of Biological Research, 4(7): 109-114
Karav, S. and Eksi, A. (2012). Antioxident capacity and total phenolic contents of peach and apricot cultivars harvested from different regions of Turkey. International Journal of Food and Nutrition Science, 1(4): 13-17.
Malanczuk, M.L. and Sosna, I. (2005). Evaluation of several apricot cultivars and clones in the lower Silesia climatic conditions. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 13: 39-48
Milosevic, T., Milosevic, N., Glisic, I. and Krska, B. (2010). Characteristics of promising apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genetic resources in Central Serbia based on blossoming period and fruit quality. Horticulture Science Prague, 37:46-55
Mratinic, E., Popovski, B., Milosevic, T. and Popovska, M. (2011). Analysis of morphological and pomological characteristics of apricot germplasm in FYR Macedonia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 13: 1121-1134
Russo, G., and Andrea, L. D. (2004). Evaluation of apricot germplasm in Southern Italy. Acta Hort., 663: 613-619.
Singleton, V.L. and Rossi, J.A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybedic phosphotungstic acid reagents. American J. Enology and Viticulture, 16:144-158
Tondon, S. (2006). Studies on evaluation of some apricot, peach and plum introductions. M.Sc. thesis Dr. Y S P UHF, Nauni, Solan, H.P. India
Verma, V.D., Pradheep, K., Yadav, S.K. and Rana, J.C. (2009). Characterisation and evaluation studies in apricot germplasm under high hills of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Plant Genetic Resources, 22(1): 17-21
Yilmaz, K. U., Kargi, S. P. and Kafkas, S. (2012). Morphological diversity of the Turkish apricot. (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm in the Irano-Caucasian ecogeographical group. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 36:688 -694
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Performance of some apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm accessions for fruit quality traits in Himachal Pradesh. (2017). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9(1), 351-356. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i1.1195