Article Main

Rachna Pande V. K. Verma

Abstract

Pumpkin is a major cultivated crop particularly in north eastern states of India that depends on insects for the pollination, as the pollens of these plants are large sized and sticky. In the present study, field and lab experiments were conducted to determine the efficiency of the pollinators of pumpkin based on their diversity, relative
abundance and foraging activity. Total four hymenopteran insect pollinators were observed in field viz., bumble bee, little honey bee, Indian honey bee and Digger bee. On the basis of abundance and relative abundance bumble bee was identified as most abundant pollinator of pumpkin with 69.69 per cent mean relative abundance as other pollinators mean relative abundance was less than 25 per cent and it was only 3.49 per cent for Indian honey bee. Foraging speed and foraging rate of bumble bee was 7.13 sec/flower and foraging rate was 3.80 flower/minute. To ensure the efficient pollinator of pumpkin flower, pollen carrying capacity, pollen deposition and percent deposition of viable pollen was studied for all the pollinators in field and laboratory condition. The pollen carrying capacity of pollinators ranged from more than 7 mg to 1 mg. It was highest for bumble bee which was 7.33 mg followed by little honey bee (6.66 mg) and least pollen carrying capacity was observed in Digger bee (1.67 mg). Pollen depositions by pollinators on stigma in a single visit was again highest for bumble bee (565 pollen grains) with maximum number of viable pollen deposition 224.33 pollen grains out of which 39.7 per cent pollen was viable. So on the basis of above result it can be concluded that bumble bee was the most abundant and most efficient pollinator of pumpkin.

Article Details

Article Details

Keywords

Bumble bee, Indian honey bee, Pollen carrying capacity, Relative abundance, Viable pollen

References
Anonymous (2014). Annual report 2014-15, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya- 793103, India, pp 202. Published by Director ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Megha-laya- 793103, India.
Anonymous (2016). Beekeepers, farmers and public Interest Groups Sue EPA over Failed oversight of Neonicotinoid-coated seeds. Pollinator News, Jan. 9, 2016. Published by Pollinator Stewardship Council.
Artz, D.R. and Nault, B.A. (2011). Performance of Apismellifera, Bombus impatiens, and Peponapis prui-nosa(Hymenoptera: Apidae) as pollinators of pumpkin. Journal of Economic Entomology,104: 1153–1161
Brewbaker, J. L. and Kwack, B. H. (1963). The essential role of calcium ion in pollen Engineering in crop improve-ment. In: Pollen physiology and biotechnology.
Debbarma, R. (2015). Study on diversity of pollinators in cucurbits and pollination biology of honey bee in chow-chow (Sechiumedule) at mid-hills of Meghalaya. M. Sc. (Agri.) thesis, College of Post Graduate Studies, Central Agricultural University, Umiam, Meghalaya, India.
Free, J. B. (1993). Insect pollination of crops, 2nd ed Lon-don: academic press.
Garibaldi, L. A., Carvalheiro, L. G., Leonhardt, S. D., Aizen, M. A., Blaauw, B. R. Isaacs, R., Kuhlmann, M., Kleijn, D., Klein, A. M., Kremen, C., Morandin, L., Scheper, J. and Winfree, R. (2014). From research to action: enhancing crop yield through wild pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(8): 439–447
Goodell, K. (2008). Contributions of native, unmanaged bees to pollination of pumpkin and squash in Ohio and cor-relates to their densities -http://www3.uakron.edu/biology/pollination/Posters/Goodell_% 20pollinator%20workshop%202008.pdf
Hoehn, P. Tscharntke, T. Tylianakis, J.M. and Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2008). Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. P Roy Soc B–Biol Sci., 275: 2283–91
Julier, H.E. and Roulston, T.H. (2009).Wild bee abundance and pollination service in cultivated pumpkins. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 563-0573
Kumar, P., and Badal, P.S. (2004). Growth and instability of horticultural crops in North-Eastern India. Agricultural Situation in India, 61(7):499-504
Kumar, P., Baskaran, S., Sundraravadivelan, C., Anburaj, J. and Kuberan, T. (2012). Insect visitors of pump-kin,Cucurbita maxima Duch., in relation to temperature and relative humidity. Journal of Agricultural Technol-ogy, 8(2): 501-513
Nath, S. and Viraktamath, S. (2010). Pollinator fauna of sunflower and their relative abundance. Karnataka ournal Agriculture Sciences, 23 (3): 517-518
Pande, R. Thakur, N.S.A., Ngachan, S.V. and Rajkhowa, D.J. (2015). First record of wax beetle, Platybolium alvearium Blair (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), in Eastern Himalaya: A new threat to Indian honey bee (Apisceranafabricius) colonies. Journal of Entomologi-cal Research, 39 (3): 269-273
Pande,R., Verma, V.K. and Thakur, N.S.A. (2016). Pollina-tors diversity and pollination biology of Indian honey bee (Apiscerana) in Chow-chow at mid-hills of Megha-laya. National Conference on Hill Agriculture In Perspective, Feb. 26-28, 2016, GPBUAT, Pantnagar.
Pateel, M.C. and Sattagi, H.N. (2007). Abundance of Differ-ent Insect Pollinators Visiting Cucumber (Cucumis sativa L.) in Rabi Season. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Scinces, 20(4): 853-854
Reddi, E.U.B. and Reddi, C.S. (1983). Pollination ecology of Jatrophagossypifolia (Euphorbiaceae). Proceedings of Indian AcadademicScience.(Plant Science), 92: 215-231
Snedecor, G.N. and Cochran, W.G. (1968). Statistical methods, 6th ed., Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi.
Tuell, J.K. and Isaacs, R. (2010). Community and species-specific responses of wild bees to insect pest control programs applied to a pollinator-dependent crop. Journal of Economic Entomology, 103: 668–75
Walters, S.A. and Taylor, B.H. (2006). Effect of honey bee pollination on pumpkin fruit set and yield. Hortscience, 41:370-373
Wien, H. C. (1997). The cucurbits: cucumber, melon, squash and pumpkin, In: The physiology of vegetable crops(H.C. Wien, ed.). CAB International, Wallingford, p. 345-386.
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Performance of hymenopteran insects as pollinators of pumpkin in Meghalaya. (2016). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(4), 1806-1810. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i4.1044