As per the census of 2011 the tribal population consists of 8.6% while it was 8.2% according to the census of 2001 in India. This paper addresses the socio-economic status of Tharu tribes in Bahraich district of Uttar Pradesh. The socio economic status is an important determinant of health, nutritional status, mortality and morbidity of an individual. Socio Economic Status also influences the accessibility, affordability, acceptability and actual utilization of available health facilities. To classify the socio-economic status of the respondents, Uday Pareek and Trivedi scale has been adopted with subject to preliminary test and slight modification as per the need of the study. Measuring the socio-economic conditions of Tharu tribes from Uday Pareek and Trivedi scale, it can be concluded that all the Tharu tribes belong to four categories viz: Upper Middle Class, Middle Class, Lower Middle Class and Lower Class. 0.28% respondent belonged to upper middle class, 5.33% were middle class, 75.56% belonged to lower middle class and 18.83% to lower class. The findings can be beneficial for implementing projects that can help in improving their situation of backwardness.
Education, Income, Occupation schedule tribes, Socio economic scale
Akash Raj, D.P., and Mahesh, T.M. (2016). Socio-economic status of students tribes in mysuru district-Karnataka. International journal of development research 6(12), 10893-10896.
Debjani, R. (2012). Socioeconomic Status of schedule Tribes in Jharkhand. Indian Journal of Spatial Science, 3 (2), 26-34.
Ghoshal, S.L.(1986). Tribal Jhabua in transition: some factors, Kurukshetra. Ind.J.Rur. Devt. XXXIV, 4-27
Indian Government. T 00-005: total population, population of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and their proportion to the total poulation. (online). Available: http://www.censusindia.net/t_00_005.
Jajuo, komuha (2014). A study the socio-economic condition of Mao naga farmers in senapati district of Manipur. (Doctoral dissertation). Assam university, Assam
Jelliff, B.D., and Jelliff, E.F.P.(1989). Direct assessment of nutritional status: Community nutritional assessment with special reference to less technically developed countries. Oxford University Press, 64-91, Oxford New York, Tokyo.
Ovwigho, B.O. ( 2011). Construction of a Socio-economic Status scale for Heads of Rural Farm Families in the North Agricultural Zone of Delta State, Nigeria. J Hum Ecol, 33(2), 113-118.
Pattanaik, D. ( 2007). Liquor culture among tribals and Government excise policy: an analytical study, M.Sc Thesis, Council of Analytical Tribal Studies (COATS), Koraput, Orissa (India).
Pulla., Rao, (2013).Socioeconomic Status of Scheduled Tribes. MERC Globalâ€™s International Journal of Management, 1(1):35-50.
Rajkumar, p., Pulla Rao., D., Jayanand Kumar., p. (2013). Analysis os socio economic status of schedule tribes in Andhra Pradesh. International journal of development research, 3(11):136-140.
Rao., D. Pulla. (2014). Socio â€“ economic status of scheduled tribes in vishakhapatnam district of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of social welfare and management,6 (4).
Sethia, S., and Joshi, P. ( 1990). Microlevel planning tribal areas. Yojana, 34 (9):24-25.
Sharma, J.C. ( 1995). Nutritional status, health, growth and development of a central Indian tribe with special reference to environment and genetic risk factors. In; anthropology of tribal health and medicine in forest environment by viswanathan Nair, N. KIRTADS, 55-60.
Sujith., Kumar., S. Dondapati.,and Keerthinmayee., Karimaddela. (2016). Socio-demographic and health profile of schedule tribes of Velugodu, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 3 (9):2615-2620
Uday Pareek Scale for Rural Areas., 2012, Retrieved from htt://publichealth-india.blogspot.in//02/uday-pareek-scale-for-rural-areas.html.
This work is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Â© Author (s)